| Literature DB >> 27660394 |
Evan P Economo1, Eli M Sarnat2, Milan Janda3, Ronald Clouse4, Pavel B Klimov5, Georg Fischer6, Benjamin D Blanchard7, Lizette N Ramirez8, Alan N Andersen9, Maia Berman9, Benoit Guénard6, Andrea Lucky10, Christian Rabeling11, Edward O Wilson12, L Lacey Knowles8.
Abstract
AIM: We sought to reconstruct the biogeographical structure and dynamics of a hyperdiverse ant genus, Pheidole, and to test several predictions of the taxon cycle hypothesis. Using large datasets on Pheidole geographical distributions and phylogeny, we (1) inferred patterns of biogeographical modularity (clusters of areas with similar faunal composition), (2) tested whether species in open habitats are more likely to be expanding their range beyond module boundaries, and (3) tested whether there is a bias of lineage flow from high- to low-diversity areas. LOCATION: The Old World.Entities:
Keywords: Formicidae; ants; colonization; dispersal; diversification; island biogeography; phylogeny; radiation; range expansion; taxon cycle
Year: 2015 PMID: 27660394 PMCID: PMC5014176 DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biogeogr ISSN: 0305-0270 Impact factor: 4.324
Figure 1The areas assigned to each of the eight biogeographical modules identified by network modularity analysis of Old World Pheidole species distributions.
Figure 2Visualization of the network of areas (larger dots) and Pheidole species (small dots), including the modules inferred by the network modularity analysis. The areas correspond to the regions depicted in Fig. 1, and widespread species discussed in the text are identified by name. The network layout is generated following the method for hierarchical bipartite graphs described by Ito et al. (2010).
Figure 3Pheidole species network ‘role’ plotted in two dimensions. The x‐axis reflects the spread of a species across modules while the y‐axis reflects the overall geographical spread of the species.
One‐tailed Wilcoxon test of two hypotheses relating Pheidole species’ range to open‐tolerance. In Analysis 1, we classified species known from forest edges/disturbed forest as ‘open tolerant’, whereas in Analysis 2, only species found in true open habitat were classified as ‘open tolerant’. Tramps refer to species known to be spread by humans
| Number of open‐tolerant species | Number of open‐intolerant species | H: Open‐tolerant species have higher | H: Open‐tolerant species have higher | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Analysis 1, with tramps | 36 | 49 | 5.95 | <3 × 10−9 | 8.51 | <9 × 10−18 |
| Analysis 1, without tramps | 31 | 49 | 5.36 | <5 × 10–8 | 8.42 | <2 × 10−17 |
| Analysis 2, with tramps | 20 | 65 | 9.16 | <1 × 10−19 | 4.81 | <8 × 10−7 |
| Analysis 2, without tramps | 15 | 65 | 8.88 | <1 × 10−19 | 4.47 | <4 × 10−6 |
Figure 4Maximum clade credibility phylogeny of Old World Pheidole inferred with beast 2.0 and dated with the crown age inferred by Economo et al. (2015). Nodes are labelled with Bayesian posterior probabilities and marginal probabilities of range occupancy inferred with BioGeoBears. The ranges of extant species are denoted with abbreviations for modules in Fig. 2 as Afrotropical (AF), Malagasy (MG), Saharo‐Mediterranean (ME), Indian‐Chinese (IC), Malayan (M), Australian (AU) and New Guinean (NG). The island groups of the Oceanian module are denoted individually as Solomon Islands (SO), Vanuatu (VN), New Caledonia (NC), Fiji (FJ), Palau (PA), Federated States of Micronesia (FM) and Polynesia east of Fiji (PO). A high‐resolution version of this figure, with taxon names, is available online in Appendix S3.
Figure 5Approximate ranges of widespread Indo‐Pacific Pheidole species and their close relatives. The panels depict groups that are inferred to have originated in Asia (top row) and New Guinea/Australia (bottom row). Expanding taxa from New Guinea have spread eastward, but have not colonized westward to nearby ‘upstream’ areas.