Literature DB >> 27660329

Transcutaneous periorbital electrical stimulation in the treatment of dry eye.

Emilio Pedrotti1, Francesca Bosello1, Adriano Fasolo1,2, Anna C Frigo3, Ivan Marchesoni1, Alfredo Ruggeri4, Giorgio Marchini1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of transcutaneous application of electrical current on symptoms and clinical signs of dry eye (DE).
METHODS: 27 patients with DE underwent transcutaneous electrostimulation with electrodes placed onto the periorbital region of both eyes and manual stimulation with a hand-piece conductor moved by the operator. Each patient underwent 12 sessions of 22 min spread over 2 months, two sessions per week in the first month and one session per week in the second month. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescein staining of the cornea, Schirmer I test and adverse events were evaluated at baseline, at end of treatment and at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: OSDI improved from 43.0±19.2 at baseline to 25.3±22.1 at end of treatment (mean±SD, p=0.001). These effects were substantially maintained at 6-month and 12-month follow-up evaluations. Improvement of the values of TBUT was recorded for the right eye at the end of treatment (p=0.003) and found in the left eye after 12 months (p=0.02). The Oxford scores changed in both eyes at the end of treatment and at the 6-month evaluation (p<0.001), and in the right eye at the 12-month evaluation (p=0.035). Schirmer I improved significantly at the end of treatment in the left eye (p=0.001) and in both eyes at the 12-month evaluation (p=0.004 and p=0.039 for the left and right eye, respectively). A significant reduction of the use of tear substitutes was found at the end of treatment (p=0.003), and was maintained during the follow-up (p<0.001).No complications occurred and patients found the treatment satisfying.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation was shown to improve DE, both subjectively and objectively, without any adverse effects and has the potential to enlarge the armamentarium for treating DE. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lacrimal gland; Ocular surface

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27660329     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Corneal Neuro-Regenerative Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Rabbit Lamellar Keratectomy Model.

Authors:  Young-Sik Yoo; Sera Park; Pyeonghwa Eun; Young Min Park; Dong Hui Lim; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

2.  Focused ultrasound stimulation on meibomian glands for the treatment of evaporative dry eye.

Authors:  Gengxi Lu; Sumanth Gollapudi; Runze Li; Margaret L Pfeiffer; Preeya Mehta; Laiming Jiang; Sarah Hamm-Alvarez; Mark Humayun; Qifa Zhou; Sandy X Zhang-Nunes
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-10-14

Review 3.  Stimulating Tear Production: Spotlight on Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Michael D Yu; Ji Kwan Park; Andrea L Kossler
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-20

4.  Effectiveness and Safety of Combined Application of Three Modes of 2940-nm Erbium:YAG and 1064-nm Neodymium:YAG Lasers in Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Authors:  Ngamjit Kasetsuwan; Lita Uthaithammarat; Yonrawee Piyacomn; Usanee Reinprayoon; Chayanon Chatchavalvanich; Ratchathorn Panchaprateep
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.