Rik T Gerritsen1, Matty Koopmans2, José G M Hofhuis3, J Randall Curtis4, Hanne Irene Jensen5, Jan G Zijlstra6, Ruth A Engelberg4, Peter E Spronk7. 1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rtgerritsen@znb.nl. 2. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands. 4. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark. 6. Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ERMES Critical Care Group, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) questionnaire is used as a self-reported measure to allow families and clinicians to assess patients' quality of dying and death. We evaluated end-of-life (EOL) experiences as measured by the QODD completed by families and nurses in the United States and the Netherlands to explore similarities and differences in these experiences and identify opportunities for improving EOL care. METHODS: Questionnaire data were gathered from family members of patients dying in the ICU and nurses caring for these patients. In The Netherlands, data were gathered in three teaching hospitals, and data was gathered from 12 sites participating in a randomized trial in the United States. The QODD consists of 25 items and has been validated in the United States. RESULTS: Data from 446 patients were analyzed (346 in the United States and 100 in the Netherlands). Dutch patients were older than those in the United States (72 + 10.2 years vs 65 + 16.0 years; P < .0025). The family-assessed overall QODD score was the same in both countries: the Netherlands = median, 9; interquartile range (IQR), 8-10 and the United States = median, 8; IQR, 5-10. US family members rated the quality of two items higher than did the Netherlands families: "time spent with loved ones" and "time spent alone." Nurse-assessed QODD ratings varied: the single-item QODD summary score was significantly higher in the Netherlands (the Netherlands: median, 9; IQR, 8-10 vs the United States: median, 7; IQR, 5-8; P < .0025), whereas the QODD total score was higher in the United States (the Netherlands: median, 6.9; IQR, 5.5-7.6 vs the United States: median, 7.1; IQR, 5.8-8.4; P = .014), although it did not meet our criteria for statistical significance. Of the 22 nurse-assessed items, 10 were significantly different between the Netherlands and the United States, with eight having higher scores in the United States and 2 having higher scores in the Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS: The QODD was rated similarly by family members in the United States and the Netherlands but varied when assessed by nurses. These differences may be due to organizational or cultural differences between the two countries or to expectations of respondents.
BACKGROUND: The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) questionnaire is used as a self-reported measure to allow families and clinicians to assess patients' quality of dying and death. We evaluated end-of-life (EOL) experiences as measured by the QODD completed by families and nurses in the United States and the Netherlands to explore similarities and differences in these experiences and identify opportunities for improving EOL care. METHODS: Questionnaire data were gathered from family members of patients dying in the ICU and nurses caring for these patients. In The Netherlands, data were gathered in three teaching hospitals, and data was gathered from 12 sites participating in a randomized trial in the United States. The QODD consists of 25 items and has been validated in the United States. RESULTS: Data from 446 patients were analyzed (346 in the United States and 100 in the Netherlands). Dutch patients were older than those in the United States (72 + 10.2 years vs 65 + 16.0 years; P < .0025). The family-assessed overall QODD score was the same in both countries: the Netherlands = median, 9; interquartile range (IQR), 8-10 and the United States = median, 8; IQR, 5-10. US family members rated the quality of two items higher than did the Netherlands families: "time spent with loved ones" and "time spent alone." Nurse-assessed QODD ratings varied: the single-item QODD summary score was significantly higher in the Netherlands (the Netherlands: median, 9; IQR, 8-10 vs the United States: median, 7; IQR, 5-8; P < .0025), whereas the QODD total score was higher in the United States (the Netherlands: median, 6.9; IQR, 5.5-7.6 vs the United States: median, 7.1; IQR, 5.8-8.4; P = .014), although it did not meet our criteria for statistical significance. Of the 22 nurse-assessed items, 10 were significantly different between the Netherlands and the United States, with eight having higher scores in the United States and 2 having higher scores in the Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS: The QODD was rated similarly by family members in the United States and the Netherlands but varied when assessed by nurses. These differences may be due to organizational or cultural differences between the two countries or to expectations of respondents.
Authors: Kenneth Mah; Richard A Powell; Carmine Malfitano; Nancy Gikaara; Lesley Chalklin; Sarah Hales; Anne Rydall; Camilla Zimmermann; Faith N Mwangi-Powell; Gary Rodin Journal: J Glob Oncol Date: 2019-06
Authors: Ye Jin Lee; Soyeon Ahn; Jun Yeun Cho; Tae Yun Park; Seo Young Yun; Junghyun Kim; Jee-Min Kim; Jinwoo Lee; Sang-Min Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee; Yeon Joo Lee Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 41.787
Authors: Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Su Chen; Joseph L Nates; Jacqueline M Kruser; Christiane Hartog; Andrej Michalsen; Nikolaos Efstathiou; Gavin M Joynt; Suzana Lobo; Alexander Avidan; Charles L Sprung Journal: Crit Care Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Margo M C van Mol; Sebastian Wagener; Jos M Latour; Paul A Boelen; Peter E Spronk; Corstiaan A den Uil; Judith A C Rietjens Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Silmara Meneguin; Cariston Rodrigo Benichel; José Fausto Morais; Cesar de Oliveira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 3.390