Tuan L Nguyen1, Justin Phan1, Jarred Hogan2, Leia Hee3, Daniel Moses4, James Otton1, Upul Premawardhana1, Rohan Rajaratnam1, Craig P Juergens1, Hany Dimitri1, John K French1, David Richards1, Liza Thomas5. 1. Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Radiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5. Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: nguyenletuan@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the relationship of adverse diastolic remodeling (ie, worsening diastolic or persistent restrictive filling) with infarct scar characteristics, and to evaluate its prognostic value after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Severe diastolic dysfunction (restrictive filling) has known prognostic value post STEMI. However, ongoing left ventricular (LV) remodeling post STEMI may alter diastolic function even if less severe. METHODS AND RESULTS: There were 218 prospectively recruited STEMI patients with serial echocardiograms (transthoracic echocardiography) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) performed, at a median of 4 days (early) and 55 days (follow-up). LV ejection fraction and infarct characteristics were assessed by CMR, and comprehensive diastolic function assessment including a diastolic grade was evaluated on transthoracic echocardiography. 'Adverse diastolic remodeling' occurred if diastolic function grade either worsened (≥1 grade) between early and follow-up imaging, or remained as persistent restrictive filling at follow-up. Follow-up infarct scar size (IS) predicted adverse diastolic remodeling (area under the curve 0.86) and persistent restrictive filling (area under the curve 0.89). The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 48 patients during follow-up (mean, 710±79 days). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that adverse diastolic remodeling (n=50) and persistent restrictive filling alone (n=33) were significant predictors of MACE (both P<.001). Multivariate Cox analysis, when adjusted for TIMI risk score and CMR IS, microvascular obstruction, and LV ejection fraction, showed adverse diastolic remodeling (HR 3.79, P<.001) was an independent predictor of MACE, as was persistent restrictive filling alone (HR 2.61, P=.019). CONCLUSIONS: Larger IS is associated with adverse diastolic remodeling. Following STEMI, adverse diastolic remodeling is a powerful prognostic marker, and identifies a larger group of 'at-risk' patients, than does persistent restrictive filling alone. Crown
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the relationship of adverse diastolic remodeling (ie, worsening diastolic or persistent restrictive filling) with infarct scar characteristics, and to evaluate its prognostic value after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Severe diastolic dysfunction (restrictive filling) has known prognostic value post STEMI. However, ongoing left ventricular (LV) remodeling post STEMI may alter diastolic function even if less severe. METHODS AND RESULTS: There were 218 prospectively recruited STEMI patients with serial echocardiograms (transthoracic echocardiography) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) performed, at a median of 4 days (early) and 55 days (follow-up). LV ejection fraction and infarct characteristics were assessed by CMR, and comprehensive diastolic function assessment including a diastolic grade was evaluated on transthoracic echocardiography. 'Adverse diastolic remodeling' occurred if diastolic function grade either worsened (≥1 grade) between early and follow-up imaging, or remained as persistent restrictive filling at follow-up. Follow-up infarct scar size (IS) predicted adverse diastolic remodeling (area under the curve 0.86) and persistent restrictive filling (area under the curve 0.89). The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 48 patients during follow-up (mean, 710±79 days). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that adverse diastolic remodeling (n=50) and persistent restrictive filling alone (n=33) were significant predictors of MACE (both P<.001). Multivariate Cox analysis, when adjusted for TIMI risk score and CMR IS, microvascular obstruction, and LV ejection fraction, showed adverse diastolic remodeling (HR 3.79, P<.001) was an independent predictor of MACE, as was persistent restrictive filling alone (HR 2.61, P=.019). CONCLUSIONS: Larger IS is associated with adverse diastolic remodeling. Following STEMI, adverse diastolic remodeling is a powerful prognostic marker, and identifies a larger group of 'at-risk' patients, than does persistent restrictive filling alone. Crown
Authors: Justin Phan; Tuan Nguyen; John French; Daniel Moses; Glen Schlaphoff; Sidney Lo; Craig Juergens; Hany Dimitri; David Richards; Liza Thomas Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2019-07-04
Authors: Marek Grabka; Magdalena Kocierz-Woźnowska; Maciej Wybraniec; Maciej Turski; Marcin Wita; Krystian Wita; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 1.426