| Literature DB >> 27659594 |
José P da Graça1, Tatiana E Ueda2, Tatiani Janegitz3, Simone S Vieira4, Mariana C Salvador2, Maria C N de Oliveira5, Sonia M Zingaretti6, Stephen J Powers7, John A Pickett8, Michael A Birkett8, Clara B Hoffmann-Campo9.
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that the plant stress related elicitor cis-jasmone (cJ) provides protection in soybean pods against the seed-sucking stink bug pest, Euschistus heros, the growth of E. heros on cJ-treated pods was investigated using three soybean cultivars differing in insect susceptibility, i.e. BRS 134 (susceptible), IAC 100 (resistant) and Dowling (resistant). E. heros showed reduced weight gain when fed cJ-treated Dowling, whereas no effect on weight gain was observed when fed other treated cultivars. Using analysis of variance, a three factor (cultivar x treatment x time) interaction was observed with concentrations of the flavonoid glycosides daidzin and genistin, and their corresponding aglycones, daidzein and genistein. There were increases in genistein and genistin concentrations in cJ-treated Dowling at 144 and 120 h post treatment, respectively. Higher concentrations of malonyldaidzin and malonylgenistin in Dowling, compared to BRS 134 and IAC 100, were observed independently of time, the highest concentrations being observed in cJ-treated seeds. Levels of glycitin and malonylglycitin were higher in BRS 134 and IAC 100 compared to Dowling. Canonical variate analysis indicated daidzein (in the first two canonical variates) and genistein (in the first only) as important discriminatory variables. These results suggest that cJ treatment leads to an increase in the levels of potentially defensive isoflavonoids in immature soybean seeds, but the negative effect upon E. heros performance is cultivar-dependent.Entities:
Keywords: Defence; Development; Euschistus heros; Flavonoid; Glycine max; cis-jasmone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27659594 PMCID: PMC5055112 DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.08.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phytochemistry ISSN: 0031-9422 Impact factor: 4.072
Summary of ANOVA [degrees of freedom (DF) and F-statistics] for weight gain of Euschistus heros fed on pods of three soybean cultivars (BRS 134, IAC 100 and Dowling), after application of treatments (H2O, Tween 20 and cis-jasmone).
| Sources of variation | DF | F-statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Weight gain (mg) | ||
| Block | 29 | – |
| Cultivar (Cul) | 2 | 2.48ns |
| Treatment (Trt) | 2 | 3.83* |
| Cul × Trt | 4 | 3.27* |
| Residue | 232 | – |
| Total | 269 | – |
*P ≤ 0.05, ns not significant P > 0.05.
Fig. 1Weight gain of Euschistus heros fed on three soybean cultivars (BRS 134, IAC 100 and Dowling), after H2O, Tween 20 and cis-jasmone spray treatment, considering the cultivar by treatment interaction (P < 0.05, Table 1). Mean ± LSD (SED: 6.76) values are shown; replication, n = 30.
Summary of ANOVA [degrees of freedom (DF) and F-statistics] for concentrations of isoflavonoids in seeds removed from pods of three soybean cultivars (BRS 134, IAC 100 and Dowling), after application of treatments: H2O, Tween 20 and cis-jasmone.
| Sources of variation | DF | F-statistics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daidzin (ng/mg) | Glycitin (ng/mg) | Genistin (ng/mg) | Malonyldaidzin (ng/mg) | Malonylglycitin (ng/mg) | Malonylgenistin (ng/mg) | Daidzein (ng/mg) | Genistein (ng/mg) | ||
| Block | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cultivar (Cul) | 2 | 13.82*** | 7.8*** | 51.96*** | 46.45*** | 24.62*** | 76.71*** | 14.88*** | 34.47*** |
| Treatment (Trt) | 2 | 4.11* | 0.09ns | 5.77** | 7.29** | 0.40ns | 7.72*** | 14.05*** | 7.59*** |
| Time | 5 | 40.19*** | 22.12*** | 33.03*** | 18.95*** | 11.55*** | 19.43*** | 23.64*** | 9.81*** |
| Cul × Trt | 4 | 5.14*** | 6.35*** | 3.06* | 6.66*** | 1.99ns | 9.97*** | 16.29*** | 2.58* |
| Cul × Time | 10 | 12.08*** | 8.75*** | 8.94*** | 8.82*** | 5.81*** | 9.10*** | 12.92*** | 5.44*** |
| Trt × Time | 10 | 1.11ns | 1.9* | 1.66ns | 0.69ns | 1.33ns | 1.55ns | 2.87** | 2.54** |
| Cul × Trt xTime | 20 | 2.05** | 1.14ns | 2.43** | 1.20ns | 1.31ns | 1.46ns | 2.70*** | 2.97*** |
| Residue | 212 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 269 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ns not-significant P > 0.05.
Fig. 2Concentrations of glycitin (A), malonyldaidzin (B) and malonylgenistin (C) in seeds removed from pods of soybean cultivars BRS 134, IAC 100 and Dowling, after H2O, Tween 20 and cis-jasmone spray treatment, considering the cultivar by treatment interaction for these isoflavonoids (P < 0.001, Table 2). Mean ± LSD. SED: 1.54 (Glycitin); 21.30 (Malonyldaidzin); 19.74 (Malonylgenistin), are shown; replication, n = 30.
Canonical variate analysis (CVA) of the isoflavonoid content in seeds of three soybean cultivars. The CVA was calculated for each cultivar separately and the results compared (see Fig. 3). The table shows the loadings on the isoflavonoids and the percentage variation and possible discrimination between the treatment x time combinations, accounted for by the first two canonical variates (CV1 and CV2).
| Cultivars | BRS 134 | IAC 100 | Dowling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isoflavonoids | CV1 | CV2 | CV1 | CV2 | CV1 | CV2 |
| Daidzein | −1.9431 | 7.2663 | 1.657 | 11.221 | −13.183 | 15.439 |
| Daidzin | −0.0792 | 0.0562 | 0.287 | −0.149 | 0.106 | −0.089 |
| Genistein | 1.1972 | 0.5248 | −3.533 | −1.103 | 1.455 | −0.799 |
| Genistin | 0.0085 | −0.0041 | −0.029 | 0.039 | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Glycitin | −0.3211 | −0.1355 | 0.070 | 0.089 | 0.447 | 0.506 |
| Malonyldaidzin | 0.0053 | −0.0121 | −0.056 | 0.031 | 0.006 | −0.004 |
| Malonylgenistin | 0.0020 | −0.0071 | 0.018 | −0.019 | −0.006 | 0.006 |
| Malonylglycitin | 0.1255 | 0.0803 | −0.059 | −0.030 | −0.381 | −0.303 |
| Variation (%) | 57.7 | 14.93 | 65.2 | 18.93 | 46.65 | 25.74 |
Fig. 3Canonical variates analysis (CVA), plots of scores (plusses) and means of scores (crosses) for combinations of treatments: H2O (W), Tween 20 (T), cis-jasmone (cJ), and time points: 24 h (24), 48 h (48), 72 h (72), 96 h (96) and 144 h (144), for each soybean cultivar BRS 134 (A), IAC 100 (B) and Dowling (C). The mean of scores (in the two dimensions, CV1 and CV2) for each combination is surrounded by a 95% confidence circle; non-overlapping circles indicate statistical difference (P < 0.05). The percentage variance (discrimination) accounted for in each of the dimensions is given in parenthesis with the axes labels.