Literature DB >> 27659363

Liberal perioperative fluid administration is an independent risk factor for morbidity and is associated with longer hospital stay after rectal cancer surgery.

M R Boland1, I Reynolds1, N McCawley1, E Galvin2, S El-Masry1, J Deasy1, D A McNamara1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Recent studies have advocated the use of perioperative fluid restriction in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery as part of an enhanced recovery protocol. Series reported to date include a heterogenous group of high- and low-risk procedures but few studies have focused on rectal cancer surgery alone. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of perioperative fluid volumes on outcomes in patients undergoing elective rectal cancer resection. METHODS A prospectively maintained database of patients with rectal cancer who underwent elective surgery over a 2-year period was reviewed. Total volume of fluid received intraoperatively was calculated, as well as blood products required in the perioperative period. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade I-IV) and the secondary outcomes were length of stay and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV). RESULTS Over a 2-year period (2012-2013), 120 patients underwent elective surgery with curative intent for rectal cancer. Median total intraoperative fluid volume received was 3680ml (range 1200-9670ml); 65/120 (54.1%) had any complications, with 20/120 (16.6%) classified as major (Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV). Intraoperative volume >3500ml was an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative all-cause morbidity (P=0.02) and was associated with major morbidity (P=0.09). Intraoperative fluid volumes also correlated with length of hospital stay (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.33; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative fluid infusion volumes in excess of 3500ml are associated with increased morbidity and length of stay in patients undergoing elective surgery for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Fluid; Intravenous; Perioperative; Rectal; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27659363      PMCID: PMC5392825          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  26 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess.

Authors:  K Holte; N E Sharrock; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  [Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer].

Authors:  Steffen Bülow
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2008-01-28

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  N N Rahbari; J B Zimmermann; T Schmidt; M Koch; M A Weigand; J Weitz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Early outcomes for rectal cancer surgery in the republic of ireland following a national centralization program.

Authors:  John P Burke; J Calvin Coffey; Emily Boyle; Frank Keane; Deborah A McNamara
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Thomas Steffen; Jutta Thierbach; Thomas Bruckner; Jochen Lange; Ignazio Tarantino
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Dileep N Lobo; Kate A Bostock; Keith R Neal; Alan C Perkins; Brian J Rowlands; Simon P Allison
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).

Authors:  Claudia Allemani; Hannah K Weir; Helena Carreira; Rhea Harewood; Devon Spika; Xiao-Si Wang; Finian Bannon; Jane V Ahn; Christopher J Johnson; Audrey Bonaventure; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Charles Stiller; Gulnar Azevedo e Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Bernard Rachet; Matthew J Soeberg; Hui You; Tomohiro Matsuda; Magdalena Bielska-Lasota; Hans Storm; Thomas C Tucker; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors.

Authors:  C A Bertelsen; A H Andreasen; T Jørgensen; H Harling
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Perioperative fluid infusion and its influence on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: implications for prevention strategies.

Authors:  A K Boesen; Y Maeda; M Rørbaek Madsen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome.

Authors:  C A Bertelsen; A H Andreasen; T Jørgensen; H Harling
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fluid balance in major abdominal surgery deserves more exploration.

Authors:  Renyuan Gao; Huanlong Qin
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Cumulative positive fluid balance is a risk factor for acute kidney injury and requirement for renal replacement therapy after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Liana Codes; Ygor Gomes de Souza; Ricardo Azevedo Cruz D'Oliveira; Jorge Luiz Andrade Bastos; Paulo Lisboa Bittencourt
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2018-04-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.