Literature DB >> 27659159

Optimizing Clinical Drug Product Performance: Applying Biopharmaceutics Risk Assessment Roadmap (BioRAM) and the BioRAM Scoring Grid.

Paul A Dickinson1, Filippos Kesisoglou2, Talia Flanagan3, Marilyn N Martinez4, Hitesh B Mistry5, John R Crison6, James E Polli7, Maria T Cruañes8, Abu T M Serajuddin9, Anette Müllertz10, Jack A Cook11, Arzu Selen12.   

Abstract

The aim of Biopharmaceutics Risk Assessment Roadmap (BioRAM) and the BioRAM Scoring Grid is to facilitate optimization of clinical performance of drug products. BioRAM strategy relies on therapy-driven drug delivery and follows an integrated systems approach for formulating and addressing critical questions and decision-making (J Pharm Sci. 2014,103(11): 3777-97). In BioRAM, risk is defined as not achieving the intended in vivo drug product performance, and success is assessed by time to decision-making and action. Emphasis on time to decision-making and time to action highlights the value of well-formulated critical questions and well-designed and conducted integrated studies. This commentary describes and illustrates application of the BioRAM Scoring Grid, a companion to the BioRAM strategy, which guides implementation of such an integrated strategy encompassing 12 critical areas and 6 assessment stages. Application of the BioRAM Scoring Grid is illustrated using published literature. Organizational considerations for implementing BioRAM strategy, including the interactions, function, and skillsets of the BioRAM group members, are also reviewed. As a creative and innovative systems approach, we believe that BioRAM is going to have a broad-reaching impact, influencing drug development and leading to unique collaborations influencing how we learn, and leverage and share knowledge. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Keywords:  Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS); Biopharmaceutics Risk Assessment Roadmap (BioRAM); bioavailability; clinical trial simulations; drug delivery; in silico modeling; in vitro and in vivo correlations/relationships (IVIVC/R); in vitro models; pharmokinetic/pharmacodynamic models; quality by design (QbD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27659159     DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  2 in total

1.  Developing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications (CRDSs) for Oral Drug Products: Virtual Webinar Series.

Authors:  Mark McAllister; Talia Flanagan; Susan Cole; Andreas Abend; Evangelos Kotzagiorgis; Jobst Limberg; Heather Mead; Victor Mangas-Sanjuan; Paul A Dickinson; Andrea Moir; Xavier Pepin; Diansong Zhou; Christophe Tistaert; Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Om Anand; Maxime Le Merdy; David B Turner; Brendan T Griffin; Adam Darwich; Jennifer Dressman; Claire Mackie
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 6.525

2.  Developing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications for Oral Drug Products-Industrial and Regulatory Perspectives.

Authors:  Mark McAllister; Talia Flanagan; Karin Boon; Xavier Pepin; Christophe Tistaert; Masoud Jamei; Andreas Abend; Evangelos Kotzagiorgis; Claire Mackie
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.321

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.