Literature DB >> 27658822

Fibrous shape underlies the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of nanosilver while surface chemistry affects the biosafety of iron oxide nanoparticles.

Alena Gábelová1, Naouale El Yamani2, Tamara Iglesias Alonso3, Barbora Buliaková4, Annamária Srančíková4, Andrea Bábelová4, Elise Runden Pran2, Lise Marie Fjellsbø2, Elisabeth Elje2,5, Mazyar Yazdani2, Maria João Silva6, Mária Dušinská2.   

Abstract

Nowadays engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are increasingly used in a wide range of commercial products and biomedical applications. Despite this, the knowledge of human potential health risk as well as comprehensive biological and toxicological information is still limited. We have investigated the capacity of two frequently used metallic ENMs, nanosilver and magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs), to induce thymidine kinase (Tk +/-) mutations in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells and transformed foci in Bhas 42 cells. Two types of nanosilver, spherical nanoparticles (AgNM300) and fibrous (AgNM302) nanorods/wires, and MNPs differing in surface modifications [MNPs coated with sodium oleate (SO-MNPs), MNPs coated with SO + polyethylene glycol (SO-PEG-MNPs) and MNPs coated with SO + PEG + poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) SO-PEG-PLGA-MNPs] were included in this study. Spherical AgNM300 showed neither mutagenic nor carcinogenic potential. In contrast, silver nanorods/wires (AgNM302) increased significantly the number of both gene mutations and transformed foci compared with the control (untreated) cells. Under the same treatment conditions, neither SO-MNPs nor SO-PEG-PLGA-MNPs increased the mutant frequency compared with control cells though an equivocal mutagenic effect was estimated for SO-PEG-MNPs. Although SO-MNPs and SO-PEG-MNPs did not show any carcinogenic potential, SO-PEG-PLGA-MNPs increased concentration dependently the number of transformed foci in Bhas 42 cells compared with the control cells. Our results revealed that fibrous shape underlies the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of nanosilver while surface chemistry affects the biosafety of MNPs. Considering that both nanosilver and MNPs are prospective ENMs for biomedical applications, further toxicological evaluations are warranted to assess comprehensively the biosafety of these nanomaterials.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27658822     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gew045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  6 in total

1.  Hazard Assessment of Benchmark Metal-Based Nanomaterials Through a Set of In Vitro Genotoxicity Assays.

Authors:  Maria Dušinská; Maria João Silva; Nádia Vital; Mariana Pinhão; Naouale El Yamani; Elise Rundén-Pran; Henriqueta Louro
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Particle Safety Assessment in Additive Manufacturing: From Exposure Risks to Advanced Toxicology Testing.

Authors:  Andi Alijagic; Magnus Engwall; Eva Särndahl; Helen Karlsson; Alexander Hedbrant; Lena Andersson; Patrik Karlsson; Magnus Dalemo; Nikolai Scherbak; Kim Färnlund; Maria Larsson; Alexander Persson
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Biological Properties of Low-Toxicity PLGA and PLGA/PHB Fibrous Nanocomposite Implants for Osseous Tissue Regeneration. Part I: Evaluation of Potential Biotoxicity.

Authors:  Izabella Krucińska; Bogusława Żywicka; Agnieszka Komisarczyk; Maria Szymonowicz; Stanisława Kowalska; Ewa Zaczyńska; Marcin Struszczyk; Anna Czarny; Piotr Jadczyk; Barbara Umińska-Wasiluk; Zbigniew Rybak; Marek Kowalczuk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Advanced Respiratory Models for Hazard Assessment of Nanomaterials-Performance of Mono-, Co- and Tricultures.

Authors:  Laura Maria Azzurra Camassa; Elisabeth Elje; Espen Mariussen; Eleonora Marta Longhin; Maria Dusinska; Shan Zienolddiny-Narui; Elise Rundén-Pran
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 5.  A systematic quality evaluation and review of nanomaterial genotoxicity studies: a regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Kirsi K Siivola; Michael J Burgum; Blanca Suárez-Merino; Martin J D Clift; Shareen H Doak; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 9.112

6.  The colony forming efficiency assay for toxicity testing of nanomaterials-Modifications for higher-throughput.

Authors:  Elise Rundén-Pran; Espen Mariussen; Naouale El Yamani; Elisabeth Elje; Eleonora Marta Longhin; Maria Dusinska
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.