| Literature DB >> 27658818 |
Hui Wang1, Michinari Matsushita2, Nobuhiro Tomaru3, Michiko Nakagawa3.
Abstract
Female reproductive success in females versus hermaphrodites has been well documented. However, documenting a potential advantage in male fertility of male versus hermaphrodite individuals in subdioecious species is also essential for understanding the evolutionary pathway toward dioecy from hermaphroditism via gynodioecy. Siring success in terms of fruit set, fruit mass, number of seeds and mean seed mass was compared by hand-pollinated crosses in the subdioecious shrub Eurya japonica The pollen was from male and hermaphrodite individuals, and the pollen recipients were females and hermaphrodites. Seed quality was also evaluated in terms of seed germination rate, seed germination day and seedling survival. Overall, pollen from males sired more fruits of larger size and more seeds than did pollen from hermaphrodites. The male advantage was observed when pollen recipients were females, whereas no effect was found in hermaphrodite recipients. Pollen from males also produced better quality seeds with higher germination rate and sooner germination day. Although these results could also be explained by a higher pollen load for crosses with male pollen donors, we took care to saturate the stigma regardless of the pollen donor. Therefore, these results suggest that male individuals of E. japonica have advantages in male fertility in terms of both quantity and quality. Our previous studies indicated that females exhibit higher female reproductive success compared with hermaphrodites. Thus, both the female and male functions of hermaphrodites are outperformed by females and males, respectively, raising the possibility that the subdioecious E. japonica at this study site is entering the transitional phase to dioecy along the gynodioecy-dioecy pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Dioecy; Eurya japonica; fruit set; male reproductive success; siring success; subdioecy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27658818 PMCID: PMC5091892 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plw067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Summary of response variables, sample sizes, measurement units, random effects, error distributions and link functions used in the GLMM analyses. The data of fruit mass and mean seed mass were log-transformed before statistical analyses.
| Response variables | No. of samples | Measurement units | Random effects | Error distributions | Link functions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Father-H | |||||
| Fruit set | 142 | 143 | Shoot | Plot, mother individual, father individual | Binomial | Logit |
| Fruit mass | 356 | 299 | Fruit | Plot, mother individual, father individual | Gaussian | Identity |
| Seed number | 356 | 299 | Fruit | Plot, mother individual, father individual | Poisson | Log |
| Mean seed mass | 142 | 143 | Shoot | Plot, mother individual, father individual | Gaussian | Identity |
| Seed germination rate | 1269 | 1033 | Seed | Plot, mother individual, father individual | Binomial | Logit |
| Seed germination day | 30 | 30 | Dish | Plot, mother individual, father individual | Poisson | Log |
| Seedling survival rate | 117 | 106 | Seedling | Plot, mother individual, father individual | Binomial | Logit |
Effects of pollen donor sex, mother sex, hand-pollination treatment and their interactions on fruit set, fruit mass, seed number per fruit and mean seed mass. To test the statistical significance of explanatory variables, the changes in deviance when each variable was removed from the full model were compared with F- or χ2 -distributions for Gaussian distributions or other distributions, respectively. Boldface indicates statistical significance.
| Response variables | Fruit set | Fruit mass | Seed number | Seed mass | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explanatory variables | df | χ2 | df | df | χ2 | df | ||||||
| Pollen donor sex (male vs.Father-H) | 1 | 8.49 | 1 | 13.33 | 1 | 7.87 | 1 | 12.13 | ||||
| Mother sex (female vs. Mother-H) | 1 | 8.19 | 1 | 2.89 | 0.089 | 1 | 9.07 | 1 | 1.57 | 0.210 | ||
| Pollen donor sex × mother sex | 1 | 18.14 | 1 | 5.83 | 1 | 8.19 | 1 | 1.26 | 0.262 | |||
Figure 1Box plots of siring success; (A) fruit set, (B) fruit mass, (C) seed numbers per fruit and (D) mean seed mass in female individuals and hermaphrodite individuals, which were hand-pollinated using pollen from hermaphrodites (Father-H) and males. The upper and lower hinges of the box indicate 75th and 25th percentiles of the data, respectively. The line and circle in the box show the median and mean of the data, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences in tests of multiple comparisons, in which family wise errors were adjusted using Tukey’s method at P = 0.05.
Figure 2Box plots of (A) flower number per individual, (B) flower number per shoot and (C) size per individual of pollen donors between hermaphrodites (H) and males (M), and individuals with a mixture of pistillate and perfect flowers (HF). HF-f: pistillate flower of HF individual; HF-p: perfect flower of HF individual. The upper and lower hinges of the box indicate 75th and 25th percentiles of the data, respectively. The line and circle in the box show the median and mean of the data, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences based on a generalised linear mixed model.
Figure 3Box plots of (A) seed germination rate, (B) seed germination day and (C) seedling survival rate of seeds sired by single pollen of hermaphrodites (Father-H) and males (Male) in female individuals. Seed germination day was calculated for every Petri dish. The upper and lower hinges of the box indicate 75th and 25th percentiles of the data, respectively. The line and circle in the box show the median and mean of the data, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences based on a generalised linear mixed model.