BACKGROUND: The development of a Sabin strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Sabin-IPV) is imperative to protecting against vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis in developing countries. METHODS: In this double-blinded, parallel-group, noninferiority trial, eligible infants aged 60-90 days were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive either 3 doses of Sabin-IPV or Salk strain-based IPV (Salk-IPV) at 30-day intervals and a booster at the age of 18 months. Immunogenicity and safety were assessed on the basis of a protocol. RESULTS:Of 1438 infants, 1200 eligible infants were recruited and received either Sabin-IPV or Salk-IPV. From the Sabin-IPV and Salk-IPV groups, 570 and 564 infants, respectively, completed the primary immunization and formed the per-protocol population. The seroconversion rates of the participants who received Sabin-IPV were 100%, 94.9%, and 99.0% (types I, II, and III, respectively), and those of the participants who received Salk-IPV were 94.7%, 91.3%, and 97.9% 1 month after the completion of primary immunization. An anamnestic response for poliovirus types I, II, and III was elicited by a booster in both groups. Except in the case of fever, other adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The immune response induced by Sabin-IPV was not inferior to that established with Salk-IPV.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The development of a Sabin strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Sabin-IPV) is imperative to protecting against vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis in developing countries. METHODS: In this double-blinded, parallel-group, noninferiority trial, eligible infants aged 60-90 days were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive either 3 doses of Sabin-IPV or Salk strain-based IPV (Salk-IPV) at 30-day intervals and a booster at the age of 18 months. Immunogenicity and safety were assessed on the basis of a protocol. RESULTS: Of 1438 infants, 1200 eligible infants were recruited and received either Sabin-IPV or Salk-IPV. From the Sabin-IPV and Salk-IPV groups, 570 and 564 infants, respectively, completed the primary immunization and formed the per-protocol population. The seroconversion rates of the participants who received Sabin-IPV were 100%, 94.9%, and 99.0% (types I, II, and III, respectively), and those of the participants who received Salk-IPV were 94.7%, 91.3%, and 97.9% 1 month after the completion of primary immunization. An anamnestic response for poliovirus types I, II, and III was elicited by a booster in both groups. Except in the case of fever, other adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The immune response induced by Sabin-IPV was not inferior to that established with Salk-IPV.
Authors: Viki Bockstal; Machteld M Tiemessen; Rogier Achterberg; Carlo Van Wordragen; Ad M Knaapen; Jan Serroyen; Wilfred E Marissen; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Roland Zahn Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Anna Lisa Ong-Lim; Georgi Shukarev; Mitzi Trinidad-Aseron; Delia Caparas-Yu; Astrid Greijer; Michel Duchene; Gert Scheper; Vitalija van Paassen; Mathieu Le Gars; Conor P Cahill; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Macaya Douoguih; Jeanne-Marie Jacquet Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 4.526