Sunita Chaurasia1, Rashmi Mittal2, G Bichappa2, Muralidhar Ramappa2, Somasheila I Murthy2. 1. Tej Kohli Cornea Institute, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 560 034, India. sunita@lvpei.org. 2. Tej Kohli Cornea Institute, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 560 034, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical presentation of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) in eyes of Indian ethnicity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from January 1995 to December 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with the diagnosis of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. METHODS: Medical records of the patients were reviewed for clinical presentation. Histology of corneal specimens of those that underwent keratoplasty was assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analysis of clinical condition. RESULTS: Mean age at first evaluation was 32.5 years (range 1-73 years), male:female = 35:18. Majority (44/53; 83 %) of the patients had bilateral involvement. 5/9 (44 %) patients with unilateral presentation were amblyopic in the affected eye. The clinical features documented were vesicles in 94 eyes, band-like pattern in 32 eyes, edema of varying degree in 23 eyes (12 patients, 1 patient was one eyed), and anterior segment changes in 1 eye. 8/45 (17 %) eyes had a regular astigmatism with steep axis >47 D (range 47.2-56.2 D). 16 eyes of 12 patients who had clinically evident corneal edema underwent keratoplasty. Mean age at keratoplasty was 58 years (range 1-73 years). 8 patients had penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and 8 had Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Mean follow-up after keratoplasty was 4.2 years (1 month to 13 years). Except one, all grafts remained clear till the last follow-up. In all specimens, the Descemet membrane was grossly thickened. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 12/53 (22.6 %) patients required keratoplasty for visually significant corneal edema. Except one, all were older adults. The patients who needed keratoplasty were bilaterally afflicted and had visually significant cornea edema in both eyes. With a mean follow-up duration of 4.2 years after keratoplasty, no recurrences were noted.
PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical presentation of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) in eyes of Indian ethnicity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from January 1995 to December 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with the diagnosis of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. METHODS: Medical records of the patients were reviewed for clinical presentation. Histology of corneal specimens of those that underwent keratoplasty was assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analysis of clinical condition. RESULTS: Mean age at first evaluation was 32.5 years (range 1-73 years), male:female = 35:18. Majority (44/53; 83 %) of the patients had bilateral involvement. 5/9 (44 %) patients with unilateral presentation were amblyopic in the affected eye. The clinical features documented were vesicles in 94 eyes, band-like pattern in 32 eyes, edema of varying degree in 23 eyes (12 patients, 1 patient was one eyed), and anterior segment changes in 1 eye. 8/45 (17 %) eyes had a regular astigmatism with steep axis >47 D (range 47.2-56.2 D). 16 eyes of 12 patients who had clinically evident corneal edema underwent keratoplasty. Mean age at keratoplasty was 58 years (range 1-73 years). 8 patients had penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and 8 had Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Mean follow-up after keratoplasty was 4.2 years (1 month to 13 years). Except one, all grafts remained clear till the last follow-up. In all specimens, the Descemet membrane was grossly thickened. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 12/53 (22.6 %) patients required keratoplasty for visually significant corneal edema. Except one, all were older adults. The patients who needed keratoplasty were bilaterally afflicted and had visually significant cornea edema in both eyes. With a mean follow-up duration of 4.2 years after keratoplasty, no recurrences were noted.
Authors: Irving M Raber; Robert Fintelmann; Sachin Chhabra; Marco Polo F Ribeiro; Ralph C Eagle; Stephen E Orlin Journal: Cornea Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: S Biswas; F L Munier; J Yardley; N Hart-Holden; R Perveen; P Cousin; J E Sutphin; B Noble; M Batterbury; C Kielty; A Hackett; R Bonshek; A Ridgway; D McLeod; V C Sheffield; E M Stone; D F Schorderet; G C Black Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2001-10-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: E Héon; W D Mathers; W L Alward; R W Weisenthal; S L Sunden; J A Fishbaugh; C M Taylor; J H Krachmer; V C Sheffield; E M Stone Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: C Teekhasaenee; S Nimmanit; S Wutthiphan; K Vareesangthip; T Laohapand; P Malasitr; R Ritch Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 12.079