Literature DB >> 27658673

Engaging Patient Advocates and Other Stakeholders to Design Measures of Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care.

Katherine Treiman1,2, Lauren McCormack3, Murrey Olmsted3, Nancy Roach4, Bryce B Reeve5, Christa E Martens5, Rebecca R Moultrie3, Hanna Sanoff5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered communication (PCC) is an essential component of patient-centered care and contributes to patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and other important patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and test survey questions to assess patients' experiences with PCC in cancer care.
METHODS: We used a conceptual model developed by the National Cancer Institute as our framework. The survey questions align with the six core functions of PCC defined in the model: Exchanging Information, Managing Uncertainty, Enabling Patient Self-Management, Fostering Healing Relationships, Making Decisions, and Responding to Emotions. The study focused on colorectal cancer patients. We conducted two rounds of cognitive interviewing to evaluate patients' ability to understand and provide valid answers to the PCC questions. Interviews were conducted in Maryland and North Carolina in 2014. We involved a patient advocacy group, Fight Colorectal Cancer, and a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders throughout the measurement development process to ensure that the survey questions capture aspects of PCC that are important to patients and meet the needs of potential end users, including researchers, healthcare organizations, and health professionals.
RESULTS: Patient and other stakeholder input informed revisions of draft survey questions, including changes to survey instructions, frame of reference for questions, response scales, and language.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility and value of engaging patients and other stakeholders in a measurement development study. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) conceptual model of patient-centered outcomes research provides a useful guide for patient engagement in research. Research funders should call for meaningful roles for patients and other stakeholders in health research, including in the development of patient-centered outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27658673     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0188-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  28 in total

1.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Jo Brett; Carole Mockford; Rosemary Barber
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne B Cashman; Sarah Adeky; Alex J Allen; Jason Corburn; Barbara A Israel; Jaime Montaño; Alvin Rafelito; Scott D Rhodes; Samara Swanston; Nina Wallerstein; Eugenia Eng
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Uncertainty intervention for watchful waiting in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Bailey; Merle H Mishel; Michael Belyea; Janet L Stewart; James Mohler
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Breaking bad news about cancer: patients' preferences for communication.

Authors:  P A Parker; W F Baile; C de Moor; R Lenzi; A P Kudelka; L Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior.

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Use of community-based participatory research in primary care to improve healthcare outcomes and disparities in care.

Authors:  Hazel Tapp; Lauren White; Mark Steuerwald; Michael Dulin
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 8.  Communicating evidence for participatory decision making.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein; Brian S Alper; Timothy E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients' psychologic adjustment and decision-making.

Authors:  C S Roberts; C E Cox; D S Reintgen; W F Baile; M Gibertini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation.

Authors:  P N Butow; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall; Q J Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Communication Skills and Professional Practice: Does It Increase Self-Efficacy in Nurses?

Authors:  César Leal-Costa; Sonia Tirado González; Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo; María Ruzafa-Martínez; José Luis Díaz Agea; Carlos Javier van-der Hofstadt Román
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-12

2.  Emergency Room Nurses' Experiences in Person-Centred Care.

Authors:  Jang Mi Kim; Na Geong Kim; Eun Nam Lee
Journal:  Nurs Rep       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kathrine Hoffmann Pii; Lone Helle Schou; Karin Piil; Mary Jarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Barriers to nurse-patient communication in Saudi Arabia: an integrative review.

Authors:  Mukhlid Alshammari; Jed Duff; Michelle Guilhermino
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2019-12-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.