Literature DB >> 27658655

Co-location of passive gear fisheries in offshore wind farms in the German EEZ of the North Sea: A first socio-economic scoping.

V Stelzenmüller1, R Diekmann2, F Bastardie3, T Schulze4, J Berkenhagen4, M Kloppmann4, G Krause5, B Pogoda6, B H Buck6, G Kraus4.   

Abstract

Worldwide the renewable energy sector is expanding at sea to address increasing demands. Recently the race for space in heavily used areas such as the North Sea triggered the proposal of co-locating other activities such as aquaculture or fisheries with passive gears in offshore wind farms (OWFs). Our interdisciplinary approach combined a quantification of spatial overlap of activities by using Vessel Monitoring System and logbook data with a stakeholder consultation to conclude and verify on the actual feasibility of co-location. In the German Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the North Sea up to 90% of Danish and 40% of German annual gillnet fleet landings of plaice overlapped with areas where OWFs are developed. Our results indicated further that the international gillnet fishery could lose up to 50% in landings within the North Sea German EEZ when OWF areas are closed entirely for fisheries. No spatial overlap was found for UK potters targeting brown crab in the German EEZ. We further identified a number of key issues and obstacles that to date hinder an actual implementation of co-location as a measure in the marine spatial planning process: defining the legal base; implementation of safety regulations; delineation of minimum requirements for fishing vessels such as capacities, quotas, technical equipment; implementation of a licensing process; and scoping for financial subsidies to set up business. The stakeholder consultation verified the scientific findings and highlighted that all those points need to be addressed in a planning process. In the German EEZ we have shown that the socio-economic importance of spatial overlap varies within planning boundaries. Therefore we recommend an interdisciplinary bottom-up approach when scoping for suitable areas of co-location. Hence, an informed marine spatial planning process requires comprehensive and spatial explicit socio-economic viability studies factoring in also ecological effects of OWFs on target species.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fishing effort displacement; Marine spatial planning (MSP); Multi-use; Stakeholder consultation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27658655     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  2 in total

1.  A GIS-based tool for an integrated assessment of spatial planning trade-offs with aquaculture.

Authors:  Antje Gimpel; Vanessa Stelzenmüller; Sandra Töpsch; Ibon Galparsoro; Matthew Gubbins; David Miller; Arantza Murillas; Alexander G Murray; Kemal Pınarbaşı; Guillem Roca; Robert Watret
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Efficiency vs resilience: The rise and fall of the German brown shrimp fishery in times of COVID 19.

Authors:  Leyre Goti-Aralucea; Jörg Berkenhagen; Erik Sulanke; Ralf Döring
Journal:  Mar Policy       Date:  2021-08-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.