Literature DB >> 27658329

What Do Patients Tweet About Their Mammography Experience?

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Anthony Labib2, Kristine Pysarenko2, Vinay Prabhu2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate themes related to patients' experience in undergoing mammography, as expressed on Twitter.
METHODS: A total of 464 tweets from July to December 2015 containing the hashtag #mammogram and relating to a patient's experience in undergoing mammography were reviewed.
RESULTS: Of the tweets, 45.5% occurred before the mammogram compared to 49.6% that occurred afterward (remainder of tweets indeterminate). However, in patients undergoing their first mammogram, 32.8% occurred before the examination, whereas in those undergoing follow-up mammogram, 53.0% occurred before the examination. Identified themes included breast compression (24.4%), advising other patients to undergo screening (23.9%), recognition of the health importance of the examination (18.8%), the act of waiting (10.1%), relief regarding results (9.7%), reflection that the examination was not that bad (9.1%), generalized apprehension regarding the examination (8.2%), interactions with staff (8.0%), the gown (5.0%), examination costs or access (3.4%), offering or reaching out for online support from other patients (3.2%), perception of screening as a sign of aging (2.4%), and the waiting room or waiting room amenities (1.3%). Of the tweets, 31.9% contained humor, of which 56.1% related to compression. Themes that were more common in patients undergoing their first, rather than follow-up, mammogram included breast compression (16.4% vs 9.1%, respectively) and that the test was not that bad (26.2% vs 7.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Online social media provides a platform for women to share their experiences and reactions in undergoing mammography, including humor, positive reflections, and encouragement of others to undergo the examination. Social media thus warrants further evaluation as a potential tool to help foster greater adherence to screening guidelines.
Copyright © 2016 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammography; breast cancer; patient experience; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27658329     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Bigger Picture: Picking the Right Soap Box-Is it Possible to Connect with Different Audience Targets (Practitioners and Patients) from the Same Platform?

Authors:  Mohammed Ali A Abbass; Hari B Keshava; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

2.  Role of social and non-social online media: how to properly leverage your internet presence for professional development and research.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Jessica T Lovett; Kamran Munawar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-05

3.  Expressed Symptoms and Attitudes Toward Using Twitter for Health Care Engagement Among Patients With Lupus on Social Media: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Alden Bunyan; Swamy Venuturupalli; Katja Reuter
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-06

4.  Frequencies of Private Mentions and Sharing of Mammography and Breast Cancer Terms on Facebook: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marco Huesch; Alison Chetlen; Joel Segel; Susann Schetter
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Making it (net)work: a social network analysis of "fertility" in Twitter before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Meghan B Smith; Jennifer K Blakemore; Jacqueline R Ho; James A Grifo
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-09-02

6.  Monitoring Twitter Conversations for Targeted Recruitment in Cancer Trials in Los Angeles County: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

Authors:  Katja Reuter; Praveen Angyan; NamQuyen Le; Alicia MacLennan; Sarah Cole; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Christianne J Lane; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Thomas A Buchanan
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-09-25

7.  "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media.

Authors:  Bence Döbrössy; Edmond Girasek; Anna Susánszky; Zsuzsa Koncz; Zsuzsa Győrffy; Virág Katalin Bognár
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.