Literature DB >> 27658200

Liver transplantation after share 35: Impact on pretransplant and posttransplant costs and mortality.

Clara T Nicolas1, Scott L Nyberg1,2, Julie K Heimbach1,2, Kymberly Watt1,3, Harvey S Chen2, Matthew A Hathcock4, Walter K Kremers1,4.   

Abstract

Share 35 was implemented in 2013 to direct livers to the most urgent candidates by prioritizing Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) ≥ 35 patients. We aim to evaluate this policy's impact on costs and mortality. Our study includes 834 wait-listed patients and 338 patients who received deceased donor, solitary liver transplants at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and December 2014. Of these patients, 101 (30%) underwent transplantation after Share 35. After Share 35, 29 (28.7%) MELD ≥ 35 patients received transplants, as opposed to 46 (19.4%) in the pre-Share 35 era (P = 0.06). No significant difference in 90-day wait-list mortality (P = 0.29) nor 365-day posttransplant mortality (P = 0.68) was found between patients transplanted before or after Share 35. Mean costs were $3,049 (P = 0.30), $5226 (P = 0.18), and $10,826 (P = 0.03) lower post-Share 35 for the 30-, 90-, and 365-day pretransplant periods, and mean costs were $5010 (P = 0.41) and $5859 (P = 0.57) higher, and $9145 (P = 0.54) lower post-Share 35 for the 30-, 90-, and 365-day posttransplant periods. In conclusion, the added cost of transplanting more MELD ≥ 35 patients may be offset by pretransplant care cost reduction. Despite shifting organs to critically ill patients, Share 35 has not impacted mortality significantly. Liver Transplantation 23:11-18 2017 AASLD.
© 2016 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27658200     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

1.  Share 35 changes in center-level liver acceptance practices.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Matthew Levine; Seth Karp; Richard Gilroy; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Potential savings in the treatment pathway of liver transplantation: an inter-sectorial analysis of cost-rising factors.

Authors:  Lena Harries; Jill Gwiasda; Zhi Qu; Harald Schrem; Christian Krauth; Volker Eric Amelung
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-07-26

3.  Improved posttransplant mortality after share 35 for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Allison J Kwong; Aparna Goel; Ajitha Mannalithara; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  The von Willebrand Factor Facilitates Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Independent Risk Stratification on the Waiting List for Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Georg P Györi; David Pereyra; Benedikt Rumpf; Hubert Hackl; Christoph Köditz; Gregor Ortmayr; Thomas Reiberger; Michael Trauner; Gabriela A Berlakovich; Patrick Starlinger
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  The Addition of C-Reactive Protein and von Willebrand Factor to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Improves Prediction of Waitlist Mortality.

Authors:  Patrick Starlinger; Joseph C Ahn; Aidan Mullan; Georg P Gyoeri; David Pereyra; Roberto Alva-Ruiz; Hubert Hackl; Thomas Reiberger; Michael Trauner; Jonas Santol; Benedikt Simbrunner; Mattias Mandorfer; Gabriela Berlakovich; Patrick S Kamath; Julie Heimbach
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 17.425

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.