Literature DB >> 27658151

Spanish Preanalytical Quality Monitoring Program (SEQC), an overview of 12 years' experience.

María Antonia Llopis, Josep Miquel Bauça, Nuria Barba, Virtudes Álvarez, Montserrat Ventura, Mercè Ibarz, Rubén Gómez-Rioja, Itziar Marzana, Juan Jose Puente, Marta Segovia, Debora Martinez, María Jesús Alsina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preanalytical variables, such as sample collection, handling and transport, may affect patient results. Preanalytical phase quality monitoring should be established in order to minimize laboratory errors and improve patient safety.
METHODS: A retrospective study (2001-2013) of the results obtained through the Spanish Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Pathology (SEQC) External quality assessment (preanalytical phase) was performed to summarize data regarding the main factors affecting preanalytical phase quality. Our aim was to compare data from 2006 to 2013 with a previously published manuscript assessing the 2001-2005 period.
RESULTS: A significant decrease in rejection rates was observed both for blood and urine samples. For serum samples, the most frequent rejection causes in the first period were non-received samples (37.5%), hemolysis (29.3%) and clotted samples (14.4%). Conversely, in the second period, hemolysis was the main rejection cause (36.2%), followed by non-received samples (34.5%) and clotted samples (11.1%). For urine samples, the main rejection cause overall was a non-received sample (up to 86.1% of cases in the second period, and 81.6% in the first). For blood samples with anticoagulant, the number of rejections also decreased. While plasma-citrate-ESR still showed the highest percentages of rejections (0.980% vs. 1.473%, p<0.001), the lowest corresponded to whole-blood EDTA (0.296% vs. 0.381%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of sample types, a decrease in preanalytical errors was confirmed. Improvements in organization, implementation of standardized procedures in the preanalytical phase, and participation in a Spanish external quality assessment scheme may have notably contributed to error reduction in this phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27658151     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Analysis of preanalytical errors in a clinical chemistry laboratory: A 2-year study.

Authors:  Jerold C Alcantara; Bandar Alharbi; Yasser Almotairi; Mohammad Jahoor Alam; Abdel Rahim Mahmoud Muddathir; Khalid Alshaghdali
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Preanalytical external quality assessment of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and CROQALM: finding undetected weak spots.

Authors:  Nora Nikolac; Jasna Lenicek Krleza; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Hemolysis Interference Studies: The Particular Case of Sodium Ion.

Authors:  José Antonio Delgado; Daniel Morell-Garcia; Josep Miquel Bauça
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 1: How do European laboratories monitor the preanalytical phase? On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).

Authors:  Janne Cadamuro; Giuseppe Lippi; Alexander von Meyer; Mercedes Ibarz; Edmee van Dongen; Michael Cornes; Mads Nybo; Pieter Vermeersch; Kjell Grankvist; Joao Tiago Guimaraes; Gunn B B Kristensen; Barbara de la Salle; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.