Literature DB >> 27657582

Evolution of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: The Impact of the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Group Trial.

Michelle Julien1, James Dove, Kevin Quindlen, Kristen Halm, Mohsen Shabahang, Jeffrey Wild, Joseph Blansfield.   

Abstract

The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Group (COST) Trial established laparoscopic procedures offer short-term benefits while preserving the same oncologic outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients compared with open procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend of laparoscopic resection for CRC before and after the publication of the COST Trial. Retrospective study of surgically treated CRC patients was conducted from January 2000 to December 2009. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and Medicare. Between 2000 and 2009, 147,388 patients underwent resection for CRC, 9,901 resections were performed laparoscopically. In 2000, 1.0 per cent of colorectal resections were performed laparoscopically. There was a dramatic increase in laparoscopic resections in 2009 to 30.4 per cent. During this time period, rates of laparoscopic resections increased for all tumor stages. Right colectomies and early stage tumors had the most significant rise from 3.1 per cent (2004) to 38.7 per cent (2009) and 4.41 per cent (2004) to 39.17 per cent (2009), respectively; whereas, rectal and later stage tumors resection rates were more modest from 2.1 per cent (2004) to 13.2 per cent (2009) and 1.41 per cent (2004) to 17.10 per cent (2009), respectively. This study demonstrates the COST Trial had a significant impact on utilization of laparoscopic colorectal resection for CRC. Although laparoscopic colorectal resections have been accepted for all types of CRCs, more difficult procedures are being adopted at slower rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27657582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

1.  Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery: Not Only for Senior Residents.

Authors:  Darren R Cullinan; Matthew R Schill; Angelia DeClue; Arghavan Salles; Paul E Wise; Michael M Awad
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.

Authors:  David Wei; Stephen Johnston; Laura Goldstein; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Compared with the Open Approach: A Real-World Multicentric Analysis.

Authors:  Tingting Qin; Min Wang; Hang Zhang; Jingdong Li; Xiaxing Deng; Yuhua Zhang; Wenxing Zhao; Ying Fan; Dewei Li; Xuemin Chen; Yechen Feng; Siwei Zhu; Zhongqiang Xing; Guangsheng Yu; Jian Xu; Junjie Xie; Changwei Dou; Hongqin Ma; Gangshan Liu; Yue Shao; Weibo Chen; Simiao Xu; Jun Liu; Jianhua Liu; Xinmin Yin; Renyi Qin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  MicroRNA-133b expression inversely correlates with MET and can serve as an optimum predictive biomarker for patients of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yihang Guo; Gui Hu; Biao Xie; Ni Gong
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.