Alexandra Champagne1, Philippe Landreville1,2, Patrick Gosselin3,4, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael2. 1. a School of Psychology , Université Laval , Québec , Canada. 2. b Centre d'Excellence sur le Vieillissement , CHU de Quebec Research Center , Québec , Canada. 3. c Department of Psychology , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Canada. 4. d Axis Adult Capacity Development , Institut universitaire de première ligne en santé et services sociaux - Centre intégré universitaire en santé et services sociaux de l'Estrie - CHUS (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS) , Sherbrooke , Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and a short form of this instrument (GAI-SF) were developed to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms in older adults in order to compensate for the lack of validated screening tools adapted to the elderly population. This study examined the psychometric properties of the French Canadian version of the GAI, in its complete (GAI-FC) and short form (GAI-FC-SF). METHOD: A total of 331 community-dwelling seniors between 65 and 92 years old participated in this study. RESULTS: Both the GAI-FC and the GAI-FC-SF have sound psychometric properties with, respectively, a high internal consistency (α = .94 and .83), an adequate convergent validity (r = .50 to .86 with instruments known to evaluate constructs similar to the GAI or related to anxiety), a good test-retest reliability (r = .89 and .85), in addition to a single-factor structure. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of both the GAI-FC and the GAI-FC-SF. The GAI-FC-SF seems to be an interesting alternative to the GAI-FC as a screening tool when time available for assessment is limited.
BACKGROUND: The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and a short form of this instrument (GAI-SF) were developed to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms in older adults in order to compensate for the lack of validated screening tools adapted to the elderly population. This study examined the psychometric properties of the French Canadian version of the GAI, in its complete (GAI-FC) and short form (GAI-FC-SF). METHOD: A total of 331 community-dwelling seniors between 65 and 92 years old participated in this study. RESULTS: Both the GAI-FC and the GAI-FC-SF have sound psychometric properties with, respectively, a high internal consistency (α = .94 and .83), an adequate convergent validity (r = .50 to .86 with instruments known to evaluate constructs similar to the GAI or related to anxiety), a good test-retest reliability (r = .89 and .85), in addition to a single-factor structure. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of both the GAI-FC and the GAI-FC-SF. The GAI-FC-SF seems to be an interesting alternative to the GAI-FC as a screening tool when time available for assessment is limited.
Authors: Helge Molde; Inger Hilde Nordhus; Torbjørn Torsheim; Knut Engedal; Anette Bakkane Bendixen; Gerard J Byrne; María Márquez-González; Andres Losada; Lei Feng; Elisabeth Kuan Tai Ow; Kullaya Pisitsungkagarn; Nattasuda Taephant; Somboon Jarukasemthawee; Alexandra Champagne; Philippe Landreville; Patrick Gosselin; Oscar Ribeiro; Gretchen J Diefenbach; Karen Blank; Sherry A Beaudreau; Jerson Laks; Narahyana Bom de Araújo; Rochele Paz Fonseca; Renata Kochhann; Analuiza Camozzato; Rob H S van den Brink; Mario Fluiter; Paul Naarding; Loeki P R M Pelzers; Astrid Lugtenburg; Richard C Oude Voshaar; Nancy A Pachana Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: George Collett; William R Young; Wendy Martin; Rhona M Anderson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 3.390