| Literature DB >> 27656630 |
Abstract
The subjects of this research are 30 students of Dong-Eui Institute of Technology in Busan city, who were grouped into two categories after applying the curriculum of the second semester of the freshman year to their classes: those whose academic performance was at the top 20% (15 students) and those whose academic performance was at the bottom 20% (15 students). For the measurement items, we measured their weight, body fat mass, body fat rates, body mass index, and abdominal fat rates by using a body composition testing machine. We then analyzed the t-test results by using the IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 program. Through this research, we found that there was a significant difference among those in the group of students whose academic performance was at the top 20% in terms of body fat mass and body fat rates, which means that academic performance has relatively little effect on body composition and abdominal fat rates.Entities:
Keywords: Academic performance; Body composition; College student; Sports major; Waist size
Year: 2016 PMID: 27656630 PMCID: PMC5031386 DOI: 10.12965/jer.1632618.309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Rehabil ISSN: 2288-176X
Physical characteristics of the research subjects
| Variable | Academic performance group | |
|---|---|---|
| At the top 20% | At the bottom 20% | |
| Age (yr) | 20.73±1.50 | 20.87±0.00 |
| Height (cm) | 173.40±5.50 | 174.33±7.50 |
| Weight (kg) | 71.06±6.65 | 71.61±8.55 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.67±0.80 | 23.45±1.00 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
Sports major practical subjects class program
| Year | Practical subjects offered | Total No. of students |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Golf (2), band and ball fitness, training exercise (2), tennis (2) | 13 |
| 2012 | Golf (2), band and ball fitness, swimming (3), training exercise (2) | 8 |
| 2013 | Golf (2), band and ball fitness, swimming (3), training exercise (2), Pilates (2), sports life dance (2) | 12 |
Exercise schedule for 15 weeks
| Term | Contents | Intensity | Time (min) | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before exercise | Warm-up | 40% HRR (7–9 RPE) | 10–20 | 5 times/week |
| 1st–6th Week | Main exercise | 50–60% HRR (9–11 RPE) | 50 | |
| 7–12th Week | Main exercise | 60–70% HRR (11–13 RPE) | 50 | |
| 12–15th Week | Main exercise | 70–80% HRR (13–15 RPE) | 50 | |
| After exercise | Cooldown | 40% HRR (7–9 RPE) | 10–20 |
HRR, heat release rate; RPE, rating of perceived exertion.
Results of body composition and abdominal fat rates according to academic adaptability
| Item | Academic performance group | Premeasurement | Postmeasurement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | At the top 20% | 70.97±6.65 | 70.39±3.15 | 0.13 |
| At the bottom 20% | 69.61±8.25 | 71.61±8.55 | −0.57 | |
| −0.303 | ||||
|
| ||||
| Body fat mass (kg) | At the top 20% | 14.62±0.20 | 14.11±1.35 | 0.29 |
| At the bottom 20% | 12.26±2.70 | 13.98±2.75 | −1.70 | |
| 0.082 | ||||
|
| ||||
| Body fat rates (%) | At the top 20% | 20.76±1.30 | 20.15±2.65 | 0.26 |
| At the bottom 20% | 17.53±1.85 | 19.43±1.65 | −1.96 | |
| 0.394 | ||||
|
| ||||
| Muscle mass (kg) | At the top 20% | 52.58±6.05 | 52.77±4.20 | −0.05 |
| At the bottom 20% | 53.79±5.45 | 53.80±5.20 | −0.00 | |
| −0.310 | ||||
|
| ||||
| Abdominal fat rates (%) | At the top 20% | 0.82±0.00 | 0.83±0.01 | −0.06 |
| At the bottom 20% | 0.83±0.01 | 0.83±0.01 | −1.82 | |
| −0.651 | ||||
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
P<0.05.