Literature DB >> 27656546

Clinical Measurement of Maximum Mouth Opening in Children of Kolkata and Its Relation with Different Facial Types.

Jalis Fatima1, Rahul Kaul1, Parul Jain1, Subrata Saha2, Sonali Halder3, Subir Sarkar4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Maximal opening of mouth is described as the greatest distance between incisal edge of maxillary central incisor to the incisal edge of mandibular central incisor, when the mouth is opened as wide as possible painlessly or as the inter incisal distance plus the overbite. Clinical measurement of normal range of Maximum Mouth Opening (MMO) in children is an important diagnostic criterion for evaluation of stomatognathic system, especially for those with temporomandibular and neurogenic dysfunctions. AIM: To determine the correlation of maximal mouth opening with age, sex, height, body weight and different facial types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional study which was conducted on 434 children, who were randomly divided into three groups based on their age: Group I- children of age 6 to 8 years, Group II- children of age 8.1 to 10 years, Group III- children of age 10.1 to 12 years. For each child, the examiner took three readings of MMO in millimeters (mm) and the mean of the three readings was considered. Age, sex, standing height, body weight and facial type of each child were also recorded simultaneously. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between the different parameters. p-value <0.05 was the bench mark for statistical significance in the analysis. Descriptive and inferential analysis was done for the data using SPSS version 20.0. (SPSS 20, inc.; Chicago).
RESULTS: The estimated average MMO measured for girls and boys in the age range of 6-8 years, with a total sample size of 139, was 41.14 ± 4.29 mm and 42.16 ± 3.98mm respectively in euryprosopic face type. In leptoproscopic face type, it was 42.12 ± 4.54mm and 43.76 ± 3.80 mm in girls and boys respectively. In mesoproscopic face type, MMO measured was 41.77 ± 4.09mm and 42.51 ± 3.95 mm in girls and boys respectively. The estimated average MMO measured for girls and boys in the age range of 8.1-10 years, with a total sample size of 143, was 44.42+4.69mm and 43.30 ± 4.11 mm in euryprosopic face type. In leptoproscopic face type, it was 43.02 ± 3.92mm and 46.29 ±3.09mm in girls and boys respectively. In mesoproscopic face type, MMO measured was 42.50 ±4.32 and 42.80 ± 5.16 mm in girls and boys respectively. The estimated average MMO measured for girls and boys in the age range of 10.1-12 years, with a total sample size of 152, was 44.63 ± 5.28 mm and 45.80 ± 5.18 mm respectively in euryprosopic face type. In leptoproscopic face type, it was 45.76 ± 4.98 mm and 46.28 ± 4.68 mm in girls and boys respectively. In mesoproscopic face type, MMO measured was 45.32 ± 5.80 mm and 46.03 ± 5.86 mm in girls and boys respectively.
CONCLUSION: There was a significant difference in MMO between males and females; with males having higher values in all age groups. MMO is seen to increase with age in a statistically significant manner. Significantly increased value of MMO was observed in leptoproscopic face type in comparison to euryproscopic and mesoproscopic face type for each age group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Face; Gender; Height; Range of motion; Weight

Year:  2016        PMID: 27656546      PMCID: PMC5028434          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21232.8217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  23 in total

1.  Effect of head position on vertical mandibular opening.

Authors:  E J Higbie; D Seidel-Cobb; L F Taylor; G S Cummings
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Mandibular movements and their relationship to age and body height in children with or without clinical signs of craniomandibular dysfunction: Part IV. A comparative study.

Authors:  A P Vanderas
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct

3.  Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.

Authors:  C Matthew Forster; Elaine Sunga; Chun-Hsi Chung
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Establishing a normal range for mouth opening: its use in screening for oral submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  S C Cox; D M Walker
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.651

5.  Mandibular jaw movement capacity in 10-17-yr-old children and adolescents: normative values and the influence of gender, age, and temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Christian Hirsch; Mike T John; Christine Lautenschläger; Thomas List
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.612

6.  Kinematics of the human mandible for different head postures.

Authors:  C M Visscher; J J Huddleston Slater; F Lobbezoo; M Naeije
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  Maximal mandibular movements in young men and women.

Authors:  G Agerberg
Journal:  Sven Tandlak Tidskr       Date:  1974-03

8.  Differences between sexes in maximum jaw opening when corrected to body size.

Authors:  A G Pullinger; S P Liu; G Low; D Tay
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Clinical utility of mandibular movement ranges.

Authors:  A Szentpétery
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  1993

10.  Median mandibular flexure at different mouth opening and its relation to different facial types: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Mandava Prasad; Mohammed Z Hussain; Sharath K Shetty; T Ashok Kumar; Mohit Khaur; Suja A George; Sameen Dalwai
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2013-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Temporomandibular Joint Septic Arthritis.

Authors:  Gianfranco Frojo; Kashyap Komarraju Tadisina; Vilaas Shetty; Alexander Y Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-23

2.  Pain Management Associated with Posttraumatic Unilateral Temporomandibular Joint Anterior Disc Displacement: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Arturo Garrocho-Rangel; Andrea Gómez-González; Adriana Torre-Delgadillo; Socorro Ruiz-Rodríguez; Amaury Pozos-Guillén
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-04-17

3.  Outcomes at 18 mo of 37 noma (cancrum oris) cases surgically treated at the Noma Children's Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria.

Authors:  Elise S Farley; Mohana Amirtharajah; Ryan D Winters; Abdurrazaq O Taiwo; Modupe J Oyemakinde; Adolphe Fotso; Linda A Torhee; Ushma C Mehta; Karla A Bil; Annick D Lenglet
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  Oral Health Status in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer before Radiotherapy: Baseline Description of an Observational Prospective Study.

Authors:  Cosimo Rupe; Alessia Basco; Anna Schiavelli; Alessandra Cassano; Francesco Micciche'; Jacopo Galli; Massimo Cordaro; Carlo Lajolo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.