Literature DB >> 27655311

Standardising analgesic administration for nurses: a prospective intervention study.

Susanne Schiek1,2, Katharina Moritz2, Stefanie J Seichter2, Mohamed Ghanem3, Georg von Salis-Soglio3, Roberto Frontini1,4, Thilo Bertsche5,6.   

Abstract

Background Uncontrolled pain reduces quality of life, delays recovery from surgery and can potentially contribute to the development of chronic pain. Strategies to improve pain management are desirable in view of these detrimental outcomes, yet frequently they are predominately medically based despite nurses playing key roles in pain assessment and analgesic administration. Objective To develop an algorithm-based guidance addressing nurses' pain assessment and analgesic administration and investigating its impact on quality of pain management. Setting Two orthopaedic units in a university hospital. Method An interdisciplinary expert panel consisting of physicians, nurses and clinical pharmacists developed an algorithm-based guidance in analgesic administration for nurses. The guidance was based on current guidelines addressing the appropriate use of analgesics. In a prospective intervention study, clinical pharmacists acted as independent monitors who assessed nurses' pain assessment and analgesic administration before (control period: usual care without any further support) and after implementation of the algorithm-based guidance (intervention period). We evaluated patient-nurse contacts for guideline adherence. We predefined guideline adherence (main outcome) as fulfilling all three of the following criteria: (A) nurses' pain intensity assessment, (B) their assessment of the patients' need for analgesics, and (C) analgesic administration depending on patients' individual pain intensity (including choice of prescribed analgesics). Main outcome measure Adherence to pain management guidelines. Results We analysed 706 patient-nurse contacts with 162 patients in the control and 748 contacts with 168 patients in the intervention period. Without support, guidelines were followed in 6 % of the patient contacts. We achieved an increase to 54 % (p < 0.001) after guidance implementation (main outcome). Guideline adherence decreased with rising pain intensity (slope coefficient -0.763, p < 0.001). Conclusion Especially in patients suffering from severe pain, current guidelines were not strictly followed by nurses when administering analgesics. Guideline adherence improved eightfold by implementing an algorithm-based guidance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithms; Analgesics; Clinical pharmacists; Decision making; Germany; Guideline adherence; Hospital; Nursing Staff; Pain management

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27655311     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0311-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  31 in total

1.  Toward improved implementation of evidence-based clinical algorithms: clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision rules, and clinical pathways.

Authors:  Gary M Gaddis; Peter Greenwald; Sue Huckson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 2.  Postoperative pain management: a practical review, part 2.

Authors:  Scott A Strassels; Ewan McNicol; Rosy Suleman
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Testing an educational nursing intervention for pain assessment and management in older people.

Authors:  Elizabeth Manias; Stephen J Gibson; Sue Finch
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  The quality of pain management in German hospitals.

Authors:  Christoph Maier; Nadja Nestler; Helmut Richter; Winfried Hardinghaus; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Michael Zenz; Jürgen Osterbrink
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  A systematic review on barriers hindering adequate cancer pain management and interventions to reduce them: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Wendy H Oldenmenger; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Silvia van Dooren; Gerrit Stoter; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Postoperative Analgesic THerapy Observational Survey (PATHOS): a practice pattern study in 7 central/southern European countries.

Authors:  Dan Benhamou; Marco Berti; Gerhard Brodner; Jose De Andres; Gaetano Draisci; Mariano Moreno-Azcoita; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Wolfgang Schwenk; Luis Miguel Torres; Eric Viel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  Using pharmacists to optimize patient outcomes and costs in the ED.

Authors:  Gabrielle Jacknin; Takashi Nakamura; Alan J Smally; Richard M Ratzan
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  Randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of an educational programme designed to improve nurses' assessment and recording of postoperative pain.

Authors:  P Ravaud; H Keïta; R Porcher; C Durand-Stocco; J M Desmonts; J Mantz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Pain management after cardiac surgery: experience with a nurse-driven pain protocol.

Authors:  Richard van Valen; Henriette van Vuuren; Ron T van Domburg; Dries van der Woerd; Jan Hofland; Ad J J C Bogers
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Evaluation of drug administration errors in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Sarah Berdot; Brigitte Sabatier; Florence Gillaizeau; Thibaut Caruba; Patrice Prognon; Pierre Durieux
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reviewing opioid use, monitoring, and legislature: Nursing perspectives.

Authors:  Deniece A Jukiewicz; Aisha Alhofaian; Zenora Thompson; Faye A Gary
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2017-09-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.