Literature DB >> 27654505

Risk for Congenital Malformation With H1N1 Influenza Vaccine: A Cohort Study With Sibling Analysis.

Jonas F Ludvigsson1, Peter Ström1, Cecilia Lundholm1, Sven Cnattingius1, Anders Ekbom1, Åke Örtqvist1, Nils Feltelius1, Fredrik Granath1, Olof Stephansson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies reporting varying risk estimates for congenital malformation in offspring of mothers undergoing vaccination against H1N1 influenza during pregnancy did not consider the potential role of confounding by familial (genetic and shared environmental) factors.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an association between maternal H1N1 vaccination during pregnancy and offspring malformation, with familial factors taken into account.
DESIGN: Population-based prospective study.
SETTING: Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Liveborn offspring born between 1 October 2009 and 1 October 2011 to mothers receiving monovalent AS03-adjuvanted H1N1 influenza vaccine (Pandemrix [GlaxoSmithKline]) during pregnancy. A total of 40 983 offspring were prenatally exposed to the vaccine, 14 385 were exposed within the first trimester (14 weeks), and 7502 were exposed during the first 8 weeks of pregnancy. Exposed offspring were compared with 197 588 unexposed offspring. Corresponding risks in exposed versus unexposed siblings were also estimated. MEASUREMENTS: Congenital malformation, with subanalyses for congenital heart disease, oral cleft, and limb deficiency.
RESULTS: Congenital malformation was observed in 2037 (4.97%) exposed offspring and 9443 (4.78%) unexposed offspring. Adjusted risk for congenital malformation was 4.98% in exposed offspring versus 4.96% in unexposed offspring (risk difference, 0.02% [95% CI, -0.26% to 0.30%]). The corresponding risk differences were 0.16% (CI, -0.23% to 0.56%) for vaccination during the first trimester and 0.10% (CI, -0.41% to 0.62%) for vaccination in the first 8 weeks. Using siblings as comparators yielded no statistically significant risk differences. LIMITATIONS: The study was based on live births, and the possibility that data on miscarriage or induced abortion could have influenced the findings cannot be ruled out. Study power was limited in analyses of specific malformations.
CONCLUSION: When intrafamilial factors were taken into consideration, H1N1 vaccination during pregnancy did not seem to be linked to overall congenital malformation in offspring, although risk increases for specific malformations could not be ruled out completely. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Swedish Research Council and Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27654505     DOI: 10.7326/M16-0139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  4 in total

Review 1.  Safety of components and platforms of COVID-19 vaccines considered for use in pregnancy: A rapid review.

Authors:  Agustín Ciapponi; Ariel Bardach; Agustina Mazzoni; Tomás Alconada; Steven A Anderson; Fernando J Argento; Jamile Ballivian; Karin Bok; Daniel Comandé; Emily Erbelding; Erin Goucher; Beate Kampmann; Ruth Karron; Flor M Munoz; María Carolina Palermo; Edward P K Parker; Federico Rodriguez Cairoli; Victoria Santa María; Andy S Stergachis; Gerald Voss; Xu Xiong; Natalia Zamora; Sabra Zaraa; Mabel Berrueta; Pierre M Buekens
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Effects of maternal influenza vaccination on adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sohyun Jeong; Eun Jin Jang; Junwoo Jo; Sunmee Jang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Incidence of ICD-Based Diagnoses of Alcohol-Related Disorders and Diseases from Swedish Nationwide Registers and Suggestions for Coding.

Authors:  David Bergman; Hannes Hagström; Andrea Johansson Capusan; Karl Mårild; Fredrik Nyberg; Kristina Sundquist; Jonas F Ludvigsson
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Safety of COVID-19 vaccines, their components or their platforms for pregnant women: A rapid review.

Authors:  Agustín Ciapponi; Ariel Bardach; Agustina Mazzoni; Tomás Alconada; Steven Anderson; Fernando J Argento; Jamile Ballivian; Karin Bok; Daniel Comandé; Emily Erbelding; Erin Goucher; Beate Kampmann; Ruth Karron; Flor M Munoz; María Carolina Palermo; Edward P K Parker; Federico Rodriguez Cairoli; María Victoria Santa; Andy Stergachis; Gerald Voss; Xu Xiong; Natalia Zamora; Sabra Zaraa; Mabel Berrueta; Pierre M Buekens
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-06-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.