Literature DB >> 27654466

Is the daily use of vacuum erection device for a month before penile prosthesis implantation beneficial? a randomized controlled trial.

O Canguven1, R A Talib1, J Campbell2, L De Young2, W El Ansari3, A Al-Ansari3.   

Abstract

Patient concerns about penile length after penile prosthesis (PP) implantation for erectile dysfunction (ED) have significant impact on patients and their partners. In addition, corporal fibrosis is associated with difficult PP implantation. The preoperative use of vacuum erectile devices (VED) is an uncommon physical treatment for such concerns. Therefore, the current randomized controlled study assessed two outcomes: whether pre-operative VED use for a month before surgery would significantly increase flaccid stretched penile length (SPL) on the day of surgery, and facilitate easier corporal dilatation intraoperatively. Fifty-one patients scheduled for PP implantation for ED were randomized to either intervention group (pre-operative VED use; 10-15 min/day for ≥30 days; Group A; n = 25), or control group (no intervention; Group B; n = 26). A research assistant (blinded to the treatment assignments) recorded SPL at baseline (initial consultation) and on day of surgery. The surgeons performing the PP implantation (also blinded to the treatment assignments) provided subjective assessments of the ease of corporal dilatation. Baseline patient characteristics, demographics, and comorbidities were the same in both groups. Baseline measurements (SPL-1) were 10.71 ± 1.28 and 10.87 ± 1.26 cm in Group A and Group B, respectively; and the day of surgery measurements (SPL-2) were 11.50 ± 1.33 and 11.06 ± 1.34 cm in Group A and Group B, respectively. In terms of outcomes: mean SPL increase in Group A was significantly more by a mean of 0.80 ± 0.38 cm (p < 0.05) compared to Group B; and surgeons' subjective report of surgical ease indicated smoother corporal dilatation for Group A compared to Group B. VED use (10-15 min/day during the month prior to PP implantation) was associated with significantly increased SPL on day of surgery, and facilitated easier corporal dilatation intraoperatively. Future studies should examine the long-term outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation after pre-operative use of vacuum erectile devices.
© 2016 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  erectile dysfunction; penile length; penile prosthesis; vacuum erection device

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27654466     DOI: 10.1111/andr.12258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Review on Penile Length and Girth Issues in Penile Prosthetic Surgery.

Authors:  Courtney Chang; Run Wang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Damage Control Considerations During IPP Surgery.

Authors:  David Y Yang; Tobias S Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices.

Authors:  Abida Sultana; Peter Grice; Josip Vukina; Ian Pearce; Vaibhav Modgil
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Gopal L Narang; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

5.  Adding a vacuum erection device to regular use of Tadalafil improves penile rehabilitation after posterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Dong-Liang Zhang; Zhong Chen; Fei-Xiang Wang; Jiong Zhang; Hong Xie; Ze-Yu Wang; Yu-Bo Gu; Qiang Fu; Lu-Jie Song
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.