T Yu1,2, J Li3, N Li1,2, R Liu4, Y Ding3, G Chang3, Y Chen3, Y Shen1,5, X Wang1,3, J Wang1,2. 1. Department of Medical Genetics, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. Institute of Pediatric Translational Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Neurology, Gui Zhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guizhou, China. 5. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Uniparental disomy (UPD) is an unusual situation wherein two homologous chromosomes are inherited from the same parent. UPDs can cause clinical abnormalities owing to the aberrant dosage of genes regulated by epigenetic imprinting or homozygosity of variants for recessive phenotypes. The aim of this study was to identify the genetic cause of the obesity and developmental delay phenotype in a 3-year-old Chinese boy. STUDY DESIGN: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was used for detecting potential copy number variations (CNVs) and homozygous segments. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified sequence variants. Sanger sequencing further confirmed the variants in GPBAR1 and CAPN10 both in the patient and the parents. RESULTS: No clinically significant CNVs were identified by CMA but a complete UPD of chromosome 2 (UPD2) was revealed in the patient. WES identified a total of 13 rare homozygous single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) on chromosome 2. Among the 13 SNVs, a nonsense variation in GPBAR1 (c.753T>G; p.Y251*) and a missense variation in CAPN10 (c.413C>T; p.S138F) were evaluated as candidate disease-causing variants based on their functional impacts to their respective protein and the biological relevance of the genes to the clinical presentation of our patient. Both GPBAR1 and CAPN10 variants were detected in the patient's mother in a heterozygous state, indicating that the patient had maternal UPD2. No other clinically relevant variants were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity of rare recessive variations caused by UPD2 likely contributed to the phenotypes of our patient. Based on emerging evidence, the nonsense variation in GPBAR1 and the missense variation in CAPN10 are considered as causally related to our patient's phenotype, that is, obesity and delayed development, respectively. The present study further supports the role of GPBAR1 in obesity and the role of calpain-10 in neurological function.
OBJECTIVE:Uniparental disomy (UPD) is an unusual situation wherein two homologous chromosomes are inherited from the same parent. UPDs can cause clinical abnormalities owing to the aberrant dosage of genes regulated by epigenetic imprinting or homozygosity of variants for recessive phenotypes. The aim of this study was to identify the genetic cause of the obesity and developmental delay phenotype in a 3-year-old Chinese boy. STUDY DESIGN: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was used for detecting potential copy number variations (CNVs) and homozygous segments. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified sequence variants. Sanger sequencing further confirmed the variants in GPBAR1 and CAPN10 both in the patient and the parents. RESULTS: No clinically significant CNVs were identified by CMA but a complete UPD of chromosome 2 (UPD2) was revealed in the patient. WES identified a total of 13 rare homozygous single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) on chromosome 2. Among the 13 SNVs, a nonsense variation in GPBAR1 (c.753T>G; p.Y251*) and a missense variation in CAPN10 (c.413C>T; p.S138F) were evaluated as candidate disease-causing variants based on their functional impacts to their respective protein and the biological relevance of the genes to the clinical presentation of our patient. Both GPBAR1 and CAPN10 variants were detected in the patient's mother in a heterozygous state, indicating that the patient had maternal UPD2. No other clinically relevant variants were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity of rare recessive variations caused by UPD2 likely contributed to the phenotypes of our patient. Based on emerging evidence, the nonsense variation in GPBAR1 and the missense variation in CAPN10 are considered as causally related to our patient's phenotype, that is, obesity and delayed development, respectively. The present study further supports the role of GPBAR1 in obesity and the role of calpain-10 in neurological function.
Authors: Mitsuhiro Watanabe; Sander M Houten; Chikage Mataki; Marcelo A Christoffolete; Brian W Kim; Hiroyuki Sato; Nadia Messaddeq; John W Harney; Osamu Ezaki; Tatsuhiko Kodama; Kristina Schoonjans; Antonio C Bianco; Johan Auwerx Journal: Nature Date: 2006-01-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Y Horikawa; N Oda; N J Cox; X Li; M Orho-Melander; M Hara; Y Hinokio; T H Lindner; H Mashima; P E Schwarz; L del Bosque-Plata; Y Horikawa; Y Oda; I Yoshiuchi; S Colilla; K S Polonsky; S Wei; P Concannon; N Iwasaki; J Schulze; L J Baier; C Bogardus; L Groop; E Boerwinkle; C L Hanis; G I Bell Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: C L Hanis; E Boerwinkle; R Chakraborty; D L Ellsworth; P Concannon; B Stirling; V A Morrison; B Wapelhorst; R S Spielman; K J Gogolin-Ewens; J M Shepard; S R Williams; N Risch; D Hinds; N Iwasaki; M Ogata; Y Omori; C Petzold; H Rietzch; H E Schröder; J Schulze; N J Cox; S Menzel; V V Boriraj; X Chen; L R Lim; T Lindner; L E Mereu; Y Q Wang; K Xiang; K Yamagata; Y Yang; G I Bell Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Laura K Conlin; Brian D Thiel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; Linda M Ernst; Elaine H Zackai; Matthew A Deardorff; Ian D Krantz; Hakon Hakonarson; Nancy B Spinner Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Johannes R Hov; Verena Keitel; Jon K Laerdahl; Lina Spomer; Eva Ellinghaus; Abdou ElSharawy; Espen Melum; Kirsten M Boberg; Thomas Manke; Tobias Balschun; Christoph Schramm; Annika Bergquist; Tobias Weismüller; Daniel Gotthardt; Christian Rust; Liesbet Henckaerts; Clive M Onnie; Rinse K Weersma; Martina Sterneck; Andreas Teufel; Heiko Runz; Adolf Stiehl; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Cisca Wijmenga; Morten H Vatn; Pieter C F Stokkers; Severine Vermeire; Christopher G Mathew; Benedicte A Lie; Ulrich Beuers; Michael P Manns; Stefan Schreiber; Erik Schrumpf; Dieter Häussinger; Andre Franke; Tom H Karlsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: James D Johnson; Zhiqiang Han; Kenichi Otani; Honggang Ye; Yan Zhang; Hong Wu; Yukio Horikawa; Stanley Misler; Graeme I Bell; Kenneth S Polonsky Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Anders O H Nygren; Najim Ameziane; Helena M B Duarte; Raymon N C P Vijzelaar; Quinten Waisfisz; Corine J Hess; Jan P Schouten; Abdellatif Errami Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ye Cao; Ho Ming Luk; Yanyan Zhang; Matthew Hoi Kin Chau; Shuwen Xue; Shirley S W Cheng; Albert Martin Li; Josephine S C Chong; Tak Yeung Leung; Zirui Dong; Kwong Wai Choy; Ivan Fai Man Lo Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 4.772