Literature DB >> 27653817

Predicting the aquatic toxicity mode of action using logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis.

Y Y Ren1, L C Zhou2, L Yang1, P Y Liu1, B W Zhao1, H X Liu3.   

Abstract

The paper highlights the use of the logistic regression (LR) method in the construction of acceptable statistically significant, robust and predictive models for the classification of chemicals according to their aquatic toxic modes of action. Essentials accounting for a reliable model were all considered carefully. The model predictors were selected by stepwise forward discriminant analysis (LDA) from a combined pool of experimental data and chemical structure-based descriptors calculated by the CODESSA and DRAGON software packages. Model predictive ability was validated both internally and externally. The applicability domain was checked by the leverage approach to verify prediction reliability. The obtained models are simple and easy to interpret. In general, LR performs much better than LDA and seems to be more attractive for the prediction of the more toxic compounds, i.e. compounds that exhibit excess toxicity versus non-polar narcotic compounds and more reactive compounds versus less reactive compounds. In addition, model fit and regression diagnostics was done through the influence plot which reflects the hat-values, studentized residuals, and Cook's distance statistics of each sample. Overdispersion was also checked for the LR model. The relationships between the descriptors and the aquatic toxic behaviour of compounds are also discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CODESSA; DRAGON; Logistic regression; influence plot; linear discriminant analysis; modes of aquatic toxic action

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27653817     DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2016.1229691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  5 in total

1.  QSAR model for predicting the toxicity of organic compounds to fathead minnow.

Authors:  Qingzhu Jia; Yunpeng Zhao; Fangyou Yan; Qiang Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  ADMET evaluation in drug discovery. 20. Prediction of breast cancer resistance protein inhibition through machine learning.

Authors:  Dejun Jiang; Tailong Lei; Zhe Wang; Chao Shen; Dongsheng Cao; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 5.514

3.  Could graph neural networks learn better molecular representation for drug discovery? A comparison study of descriptor-based and graph-based models.

Authors:  Dejun Jiang; Zhenxing Wu; Chang-Yu Hsieh; Guangyong Chen; Ben Liao; Zhe Wang; Chao Shen; Dongsheng Cao; Jian Wu; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  A feature transferring workflow between data-poor compounds in various tasks.

Authors:  Xiaofei Sun; Jingyuan Zhu; Bin Chen; Hengzhi You; Huiqing Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prior Knowledge for Predictive Modeling: The Case of Acute Aquatic Toxicity.

Authors:  Gulnara Shavalieva; Stavros Papadokonstantakis; Gregory Peters
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.