| Literature DB >> 27652125 |
Jian Ma1, Mei Deng1, Si-Yu Lv1, Qiang Yang1, Qian-Tao Jiang1, Peng-Fei Qi1, Wei Li1, Guo-Yue Chen1, Xiu-Jin Lan1, Yu-Ming Wei1.
Abstract
Mature embryo is an excellent explant for tissue culture as it is convenient to be obtained without limitation of growing seasons and development stages. However, regeneration ability of the calli from wheat mature embryos is limited, thus hindering its application. To identify genes associated with the tissue culture response (TCR) of wheat, QTLs for callus induction from mature embryos and callus regeneration were detected using a recombinant inbred lines (RILs) population derived from the cross between a synthetic hexaploid wheat genotype, SHW-L1 and a commercial cultivar Chuanmai 32. Three QTLs for callus rate were identified and they were located on chromosomes 1D, 5A, and 6D, respectively, with explained phenotypic variation ranging from 10.16 to 11.82 %. One QTL for differentiation rate was detected only with 10.96 % of the phenotypic variation explained. Two QTLs for emergence rate were identified and they were located on 3B and 4A, respectively, with 9.88 and 10.30 % of phenotypic variation. The results presented in this study with those reported previously indicated that group 1, 3, and 5 chromosomes are likely to play important roles in TCR of wheat.Entities:
Keywords: Callus rate; Differentiation; Plant regeneration rate; QTL; Wheat
Year: 2016 PMID: 27652125 PMCID: PMC5021639 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3241-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Tissue culture response of mature embryos. a, b Callus induction of Chuanmai32 and SHW-L1, respectively; c, d the difference of callus regeneration between Chuanmai32 and SHW-L1
Parameters (%) of tissue culture response traits in RIL population
| Trait | Parentsa | 2012b | 2013b | 2014b | Averagec | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHW-L1 | Chuanmai 32 | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | |
| Callus rate | 59.3 | 62.2 | 57.8 | 14.2–92.5 | 48.9 | 4.5–99.0 | 62.4 | 18.0–97.0 | 56.4 | 12.2–96.2 |
| Differentiation rate | 43.2 | 47.3 | 75.4 | 16.3–100.0 | 39.3 | 3.3–85.0 | 89.4 | 37.5–100.0 | 68.1 | 19.1–95.0 |
| Emergence rate | 17.4** | 4.1 | 13.3 | 0.0–70.0 | 30 | 0.0–80.0 | – | – | 21.3 | 2.1–73.3 |
** Significant differences between SHW-L1 and Chuanmai 32 at p = 0.01
aThe values were means of data from 3 or 2 years
bThe values were calculated from the data of the 171 lines of the population
cThe average was calculated by the data of 2 or 3 years
Fig. 2Frequency distributions of the three traits from the RIL population Data was based on average over the investigated experiments. The black arrow indicates the value of SHW-L1 and the blank arrow indicates Chuanmai 32
Correlation analysis of the three investigated traits in RIL population
| Callus rate | Differentiation rate | Emergence rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Callus rate | |||
| Pearson correlation | 1 | 0.315** | 0.066 |
| Significance (two-tailed) | <0.01 | 0.43 | |
| # of analyzed lines | 149 | 149 | 149 |
| Differentiation rate | |||
| Pearson correlation | 0.315** | 1 | 0.318** |
| Significance (two-tailed) | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
| # of analyzed lines | 149 | 149 | 149 |
| Emergence rate | |||
| Pearson correlation | 0.066 | 0.318** | 1 |
| Significance (two-tailed) | 0.43 | <0.01 | |
| # of analyzed lines | 149 | 149 | 149 |
**Significant differences at p = 0.01
QTL controlling callus rate, differentiation rate, and emergence rate detected in the RIL population derived from the cross of SHW-L1/Chuanmai 32
| Trait | QTL | Chromo-some | Trail | Position | Left markera | Right markera | LODb | PVE (%)c | Addd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Callus rate |
| 6D | 2012 | 1.21 | wPt-730539 | rPt-7068 | 3.88 | 11.44 | −0.07 |
|
| 5A | 2013 | 54.41 | wPt-2873/wPt-1200 | wPt-733461 | 3.84 | 10.16 | −0.09 | |
|
| 1D | 2014 | 55.11 | wPt-730941 | wPt-741323 | 5.02 | 11.82 | −0.07 | |
| Differentiation rate |
| 1A | 2012 | 180.71 | wPt-3698/wPt-730408 | wPt-666607/wPt-665725 | 3.96 | 10.96 | 0.07 |
| Emergence rate |
| 3B | 2014 | 78.71 | wPt-1191 | wPt-744159 | 3.50 | 9.88 | −0.05 |
|
| 4A | 2014 | 21.61 | wPt-0798 | wPt-0764/wPt-8657/wPt-734161 | 3.50 | 10.3 | −0.06 |
aThe left and right flanking marker of the interval of LOD peak value for a given QTL
bThe logarithm of odds
cPercentage of the phenotype variation explained
dAdditive effect at QTL, positive values indicate the effect from SHW-L1, negative values indicate the effect from Chuanmai 32
Fig. 3QTLs for the three traits of the RIL population. Map distances (cM) are indicated on the left of each chromosomes, and markers names are on the right