| Literature DB >> 27651993 |
Valeriia Shiposha1, Pilar Catalán1, Marina Olonova2, Isabel Marques3.
Abstract
Annual Mediterranean species of the genus Brachypodium are promising model plants for energy crops since their selfing nature and short-life cycles are an advantage in breeding programs. The false brome, B. distachyon, has already been sequenced and new genomic initiatives have triggered the de-novo genome sequencing of its close relatives such as B. stacei, a species that was until recently mistaken for B. distachyon. However, the success of these initiatives hinges on detailed knowledge about the distribution of genetic variation within and among populations for the effective use of germplasm in a breeding program. Understanding population genetic diversity and genetic structure is also an important prerequisite for designing effective experimental populations for genomic wide studies. However, population genetic data are still limited in B. stacei. We therefore selected and amplified 10 nuclear microsatellite markers to depict patterns of population structure and genetic variation among 181 individuals from 19 populations of B. stacei occurring in its predominant range, the western Mediterranean area: mainland Iberian Peninsula, continental Balearic Islands and oceanic Canary Islands. Our genetic results support the occurrence of a predominant selfing system with extremely high levels of homozygosity across the analyzed populations. Despite the low level of genetic variation found, two different genetic clusters were retrieved, one clustering all SE Iberian mainland populations and the island of Minorca and another one grouping all S Iberian mainland populations, the Canary Islands and all Majorcan populations except one that clustered with the former group. These results, together with a high sharing of alleles (89%) suggest different colonization routes from the mainland Iberian Peninsula into the islands. A recent colonization scenario could explain the relatively low levels of genetic diversity and low number of alleles found in the Canary Islands populations while older colonization events are hypothesized to explain the high genetic diversity values found in the Majorcan populations. Our study provides widely applicable information about geographical patterns of genetic variation in B. stacei. Among others, the genetic pattern and the existence of local alleles will need to be adequately reflected in the germplasm collection of B. stacei for efficient genome wide association studies.Entities:
Keywords: Annual model grass species; Balearic (Gymnesic) and Canarian islands; Brachypodium stacei; Genetic diversity and structure; Isolation; SSRs; Western Mediterranean
Year: 2016 PMID: 27651993 PMCID: PMC5018678 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Sampled populations of Brachypodium stacei sorted by geographical area.
The location, population code, number of plants genotyped (N), mean observed heterozygosity (H) and expected heterozygosity (H), mean number of alleles (N), allelic richness (A), inbreeding coefficient (FIS), selfing rate (s), and number of exclusive genotypes (%. between parenthesis) are shown.
| Locality | Code | Latitude (N) | Longitude (W) | Exclusive genotypes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Spain: Granada, Moclin | GRA | 10 | 37°19′59″N | 3°46′59″W | 0.240 | 0.155 | 12 | 1.126 | 0.667 | 0.800 | 3 (30%) |
| S Spain: Almeria, Cabo de Gata | ALM | 10 | 36°44′2″N | 2°8′35″W | 0.170 | 0.102 | 11 | 1.050 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 3 (30%) |
| S Spain: Jaen: Cazorla, Cortijos Nuevos | JAE1 | 10 | 38°11′31″N | 2°48′14″W | 0.120 | 0.116 | 12 | 1.176 | 0.723 | 0.839 | 4 (40%) |
| S Spain: Jaen: Quesada, Tiscar | JAE2 | 10 | 37°46′5″N | 3°1′23″W | 0.200 | 0.100 | 10 | 1.000 | – | – | 1 (10%) |
| SE Spain: Murcia, Portman | PORT | 10 | 37°34′57″N | 0°51′15″W | 0.200 | 0.100 | 10 | 1.000 | – | – | 1 (10%) |
| SE Spain: Murcia, Calblanque | CALBN | 10 | 37°35′59″N | 0°45′29″W | 0.140 | 0.108 | 14 | 1.246 | 0.526 | 0.689 | 4 (40%) |
| SE Spain: Murcia, Cobaticas | CALBA | 10 | 37°35′59″N | 0°45′30″W | 0.110 | 0.105 | 15 | 1.339 | 0.617 | 0.763 | 5 (50%) |
| SE Spain: Murcia, Cala Reona | CALREL | 10 | 37°36′56″N | 0°42′56″W | 0.030 | 0.009 | 13 | 1.239 | 0.520 | 0.684 | 5 (50%) |
| SE Spain: Alicante, Cabo La Nao | ALI | 5 | 38°45′22″N | 0°13′8″E | 0.300 | 0.150 | 10 | 1.000 | – | – | 1 (20%) |
| Spain: Minorca: Es Mercadal, Toro | MEN | 10 | 39°59′6″N | 4°6′47″E | 0.240 | 0.173 | 13 | 1.203 | 0.386 | 0.556 | 3 (30%) |
| Spain: Majorca: Sa Dragonera, Gambes | DRAG | 10 | 39°35′13″N | 2°19′37″E | 0.111 | 0.154 | 16 | 1.428 | 0.916 | 0.956 | 5 (50%) |
| Spain: Majorca: Arta, Peninsula de Llevant | ARTA | 10 | 39°44′10″N | 3°20′6″E | 0.210 | 0.128 | 12 | 1.126 | 0.666 | 0.799 | 3 (30%) |
| Spain: Majorca: Campanet, Coves | CAMPA | 10 | 39°47′31″N | 2°58′12″E | 0.130 | 0.138 | 14 | 1.434 | 0.486 | 0.654 | 6 (60%) |
| Spain: Majorca: Alcudia, Punta Negra | ALCU | 10 | 39°52′48″N | 3°10′41″E | 0.140 | 0.108 | 14 | 1.200 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 2 (20%) |
| Spain: Majorca: Felenitx, San Salvador | FELEN | 10 | 39°27′4″N | 3°11′17″E | 0.130 | 0.109 | 14 | 1.200 | 0.250 | 0.400 | 4 (40%) |
| Spain: Majorca: Petra, Bonany | BONA | 10 | 39°35′38″N | 3°5′10″E | 0.290 | 0.391 | 23 | 1.992 | 0.385 | 0.5555 | 9 (90%) |
| Spain: Majorca: Banyalbufar, Ses Animes | BANYA | 6 | 39°41′6″N | 2°30′36″E | 0.167 | 0.239 | 15 | 1.496 | 0.825 | 0.904 | 6 (100%) |
| Spain: Gomera: Agulo | GOM | 10 | 28°10′59″N | 17°10′59″W | 0.150 | 0.118 | 11 | 1.076 | 0.891 | 0.942 | 2 (20%) |
| Spain: Lanzarote: Teguise | LAN | 10 | 29°4′1″N | 13°31′1″W | 0.230 | 0.136 | 11 | 1.096 | 1.000 | 1 | 2 (20%) |
Notes:
FIS values deviating from HWE (P > 0.05).
Figure 1Location of the study area of Brachypodium stacei.
Collection localities of Brachypodium stacei populations in mainland Iberian Peninsula, the continental Balearic (Gymnesic) Islands (Minorca and Majorca) and the oceanic Canary Islands. Pie-charts indicate the proportion of ancestry assigned to individuals of each population by Bayesian clustering analysis using STRUCTURE.
Results of the Hardy Weinberg exact tests retrieved by GENEPOP for 19 populations of Brachypodium stacei.
P-value (0.05) associated with the null hypothesis of random union of gametes (or ‘–’ if no data were available, or only one allele was present) estimated with a Markov chain algorithm and the standard error (S.E.) of this estimate.
| Population | S.E. | |
|---|---|---|
| GRA | 0.0519 | 0.0011 |
| ALM | – | |
| JAE1 | 0.0259 | 0.0007 |
| JAE2 | – | |
| PORT | – | |
| CALBN | 0.0077 | 0.0009 |
| CALBA | 0.0007 | 0.0001 |
| CALREL | 0.0249 | 0.0006 |
| ALI | – | |
| MEN | 0.1016 | 0.0015 |
| DRAG | 0 | 0 |
| ARTA | 0.053 | 0.0012 |
| CAMPA | 0.0361 | 0.0014 |
| ALCU | – | |
| FELEN | 0.0508 | 0.0028 |
| BONA | 0 | 0 |
| BANYA | 0 | 0 |
| GOM | 0.0515 | 0.0012 |
| LAN | 0.0096 | 0.0005 |
Characteristics and genetic diversity statistics of the nuclear microsatellite markers used in the genetic study of Brachypodium stacei.
For each locus, the total number of alleles (N), mean expected heterozygosity (H), mean observed heterozygosity (H), and the fixation index (FIS) obtained from the 181 studied individuals are shown.
| Locus | Repeat motif | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (GT)15 | 2 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.003 | |
| (CT)11 | 2 | 0.035 | 0.005 | 0.848 | |
| (CTT)8 | 4 | 0.129 | 0.047 | 0.632 | |
| (GT)15 | 4 | 0.122 | 0.032 | 0.717 | |
| (AAG)7 | 6 | 0.119 | 0.058 | 0.486 | |
| (AGC)7 | 6 | 0.145 | 0.032 | 0.758 | |
| (AGA)7 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0 | |
| (ATA)12 | 4 | 0.066 | 0.049 | 0.298 | |
| (AC)9 | 5 | 0.049 | 0.037 | 0.253 | |
| (GA)6 | 3 | 0.025 | 0.026 | −0.069 |
Figure 2Distribution of Brachypodium stacei alleles.
Frequency of the alleles found in Brachypodium stacei across the geographical area sampled: mainland Iberian Peninsula (SE Spain and S Spain) and the islands of Minorca, Majorca and the Canary Islands. Colors of areas are indicated in the chart.
Figure 3Overall allelic richness of Brachypodium stacei.
Map of overall allelic richness of Brachypodium stacei across the geographic range sampled. Dark areas contain higher richness.
Figure 4Population structure of Brachypodium stacei.
Population structure of 181 individuals of Brachypodium stacei based on 10 nSSRs and using the best assignment result (K = 2) retrieved by STRUCTURE (A) and by BAPS (B) with K from 1 to 10 (replicated 10×) under an admixture model. Each individual is represented by a thin horizontal line divided into K colored segments that represent the individual’s estimated membership fractions in K clusters. The different geographic areas are labelled below the graph. Abbreviations of populations follow those indicated in Table 1.
Figure 5Genetic relationships among Brachypodium stacei populations based on Nei’s genetic distance.
Principal Coordinate analysis (PCoA) samples using the scored nSSRs markers. Percentage of explained variance of each axis is given in parentheses. Population symbols are shown in the chart.
Figure 6Unrooted neighbor-joining trees of Brachypodium stacei populations based on Nei’s genetic distance.
Unrooted neighbor-joining tree showing relationships among the individuals collected in 19 populations. Numbers associated with branches indicate bootstrap values based on 1,000 replications. Colours followed the ones depicted in Fig. 4 for K = 2. Population codes are indicated in Table 1. (A) Genetic relationships among all individuals of B. stacei. (B) Genetic relationships without the individuals of B. stacei showing admixture in STRUCTURE. Note that the Majorcan population of BONA (arrow) is grouped with SE mainland populations in both NJ trees.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for 19 populations of Brachypodium stacei.
| Source of variance | d.f. | Variance components | % Variance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All populations | Among populations | 18 | 1.011 | 74.88 |
| Within populations | 343 | 0.339 | 25.12 | |
| Between genetic groups defined by STRUCTURE and BAPS ( | Among groups | 1 | 0.370 | 24.05 |
| Among populations within groups | 17 | 0.831 | 53.94 | |
| Within populations | 343 | 0.339 | 22.01 | |
| Mainland vs. islands | Among groups | 1 | 0.109 | 7.77 |
| Among populations within groups | 17 | 0.954 | 68.04 | |
| Within populations | 343 | 0.339 | 24.19 | |
| Within mainland populations (S Spain vs. SE Spain) | Among groups | 1 | 0.831 | 46.41 |
| Among populations within groups | 7 | 0.752 | 41.99 | |
| Within populations | 161 | 0.207 | 11.60 | |
| Within island populations (Balearic islands vs. Canary islands) | Among groups | 2 | 0.448 | 32.26 |
| Among populations within groups | 7 | 0.486 | 34.97 | |
| Within populations | 182 | 0.455 | 32.77 |