Jay H Lubin1, David Couper2, Pamela L Lutsey3, Hiroshi Yatsuya4. 1. Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 2. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN. 4. Department of Public Health, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Kutsukake-cho, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette smoking, various metabolic and lipid-related factors and hypertension are well-recognized cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Since smoking affects many of these factors, use of a single imprecise smoking metric, for example, ever or never smoked, may allow residual confounding and explain inconsistencies in current assessments of interactions. METHODS: Using a comprehensive model in pack-years and cigarettes/day for the complex smoking-related relative risk (RR) of CVD to reduce residual confounding, we evaluated interactions with non-tobacco risk factors, including additive (non-synergistic) and multiplicative (synergistic) forms. Data were from the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study from four areas of the United States recruited in 1987-1989 with follow-up through 2008. Analyses included 14 127 participants, 207 693 person-years and 2857 CVD events. RESULTS: Analyses revealed distinct interactions with smoking: including statistical consistency with additive (body mass index [BMI], waist to hip ratio [WHR], diabetes mellitus [DM], glucose, insulin, high density lipoproteins [HDL] and HDL(2)); and multiplicative (hypertension, total cholesterol [TC], low density lipoproteins [LDLs], apolipoprotein B [apoB], TC to HDL ratio and HDL(3)) associations, as well as indeterminate (apolipoprotein A-I [apoA-I] and triglycerides) associations. CONCLUSIONS: The forms of the interactions were revealing but require confirmation. Improved understanding of joint associations may help clarify the public health burden of smoking for CVD, links between etiologic factors and biological mechanisms, and the consequences of joint exposures, whereby synergistic associations highlight joint effects and non-synergistic associations suggest distinct contributions. IMPLICATIONS: Joint associations for cigarette smoking and non-tobacco risk factors were distinct, revealing synergistic/multiplicative (hypertension, TC, LDL, apoB, TC/HDL, HDL(3)), non-synergistic/additive (BMI, WHR, DM, glucose, insulin, HDL, HDL(2)) and indeterminate (apoA-I and TRIG) associations. If confirmed, these results may help better define the public health burden of smoking on CVD risk and identify links between etiologic factors and biologic mechanisms, where synergistic associations highlight joint impacts and non-synergistic associations suggest distinct contributions from each factor. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette smoking, various metabolic and lipid-related factors and hypertension are well-recognized cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Since smoking affects many of these factors, use of a single imprecise smoking metric, for example, ever or never smoked, may allow residual confounding and explain inconsistencies in current assessments of interactions. METHODS: Using a comprehensive model in pack-years and cigarettes/day for the complex smoking-related relative risk (RR) of CVD to reduce residual confounding, we evaluated interactions with non-tobacco risk factors, including additive (non-synergistic) and multiplicative (synergistic) forms. Data were from the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study from four areas of the United States recruited in 1987-1989 with follow-up through 2008. Analyses included 14 127 participants, 207 693 person-years and 2857 CVD events. RESULTS: Analyses revealed distinct interactions with smoking: including statistical consistency with additive (body mass index [BMI], waist to hip ratio [WHR], diabetes mellitus [DM], glucose, insulin, high density lipoproteins [HDL] and HDL(2)); and multiplicative (hypertension, total cholesterol [TC], low density lipoproteins [LDLs], apolipoprotein B [apoB], TC to HDL ratio and HDL(3)) associations, as well as indeterminate (apolipoprotein A-I [apoA-I] and triglycerides) associations. CONCLUSIONS: The forms of the interactions were revealing but require confirmation. Improved understanding of joint associations may help clarify the public health burden of smoking for CVD, links between etiologic factors and biological mechanisms, and the consequences of joint exposures, whereby synergistic associations highlight joint effects and non-synergistic associations suggest distinct contributions. IMPLICATIONS: Joint associations for cigarette smoking and non-tobacco risk factors were distinct, revealing synergistic/multiplicative (hypertension, TC, LDL, apoB, TC/HDL, HDL(3)), non-synergistic/additive (BMI, WHR, DM, glucose, insulin, HDL, HDL(2)) and indeterminate (apoA-I and TRIG) associations. If confirmed, these results may help better define the public health burden of smoking on CVD risk and identify links between etiologic factors and biologic mechanisms, where synergistic associations highlight joint impacts and non-synergistic associations suggest distinct contributions from each factor. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Vassilios G Athyros; Niki Katsiki; Michael Doumas; Asterios Karagiannis; Dimitri P Mikhailidis Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: N Sarwar; P Gao; S R Kondapally Seshasai; R Gobin; S Kaptoge; E Di Angelantonio; E Ingelsson; D A Lawlor; E Selvin; M Stampfer; C D A Stehouwer; S Lewington; L Pennells; A Thompson; N Sattar; I R White; K K Ray; J Danesh Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Alessandra Saldanha de Mattos Matheus; Lucianne Righeti Monteiro Tannus; Roberta Arnoldi Cobas; Catia C Sousa Palma; Carlos Antonio Negrato; Marilia de Brito Gomes Journal: Int J Hypertens Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 2.420
Authors: Andrea Sansone; Angelo Cignarelli; Massimiliano Sansone; Francesco Romanelli; Giovanni Corona; Daniele Gianfrilli; Andrea Isidori; Francesco Giorgino; Andrea Lenzi Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.257
Authors: Jacek A Kopec; Eric C Sayre; Benajir Shams; Linda C Li; Hui Xie; Lynne M Feehan; John M Esdaile Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-23 Impact factor: 4.614