Literature DB >> 2765147

Uses and abuses of a biosynthetic dressing for partial skin thickness burns.

L G Phillips1, M C Robson, D J Smith, W A Phillips, W D Gracia, T P McHugh, W G Sullivan, K Mathoney, K Swartz, T Meltzer.   

Abstract

The following report reviews 851 applications of Biobrane on partial skin thickness burn wounds awaiting epithelialization. After the patients had been evaluated and resuscitated as needed, the burn wounds were cleansed and debrided. Those evaluated as shallow were treated with Biobrane application. Joint surfaces were splinted for immobilization. The wound was inspected at 24 and 48 h and if any fluid had accumulated it was aspirated and the wound was redressed. When the Biobrane was adherent, the wound was covered with a light dressing and joint immobilization was discontinued. Treatment with Biobrane dressing provided certain advantages over other topical wound care. As the dressing changes were performed less frequently outpatient care was possible, with a resultant decrease in both the length of hospital stay and the ultimate cost of burn care. Wound desiccation is prevented and pain is decreased. Accurate diagnosis of wound depth is crucial if Biobrane is to be used. Very deep wounds will not allow Biobrane adherence, neither will it occur if the wound has a high bacterial count. If joint surfaces are not splinted, the Biobrane will shear and not adhere to the wound. Convex and concave surfaces can be treated with Biobrane, which may need to be meshed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2765147     DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(89)90044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  8 in total

1.  Toxic epidermal necrolysis: a burn-centre challenge.

Authors:  W Peters; J Zaidi; L Douglas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Paediatric partial-thickness scald burns--is Biobrane the best treatment available?

Authors:  Anirban Mandal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Current wound healing procedures and potential care.

Authors:  Michael B Dreifke; Amil A Jayasuriya; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 7.328

4.  Dermal matrices and bioengineered skin substitutes: a critical review of current options.

Authors:  Heidi Debels; Moustapha Hamdi; Keren Abberton; Wayne Morrison
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-02-06

5.  Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol.

Authors:  Anjana Bairagi; Bronwyn Griffin; Zephanie Tyack; Dimitrios Vagenas; Steven M McPhail; Roy Kimble
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 6.  Made in Germany: A Quality Indicator Not Only in the Automobile Industry But Also When It Comes to Skin Replacement: How an Automobile Textile Research Institute Developed a New Skin Substitute.

Authors:  Herbert Leopold Haller; Matthias Rapp; Daniel Popp; Sebastian Philipp Nischwitz; Lars Peter Kamolz
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  The search for an ideal temporary skin substitute: AWBAT.

Authors:  E Aubrey Woodroof
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-02-12

8.  Experience with biobrane: uses and caveats for success.

Authors:  John E Greenwood; Jill Clausen; Sheila Kavanagh
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.