Literature DB >> 27651401

What Do Our Patients Truly Want? Conjoint Analysis of an Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice Using Internet Crowdsourcing.

Cindy Wu1, C Scott Hultman2, Paul Diegidio2, Steven Hermiz2, Roja Garimella2, Trisha M Crutchfield2, Clara N Lee2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: What do patients want when looking for an aesthetic surgeon? When faced with attributes like reputation, years in practice, testimonials, photos, and pricing, which is more valuable? Moreover, are attributes procedure-specific? Currently, inadequate evidence exists on which attributes are most important to patients, and to our knowledge, none on procedure-specific preferences.
OBJECTIVES: First, to determine the most important attributes to breast augmentation, combined breast/abdominal surgery, and facelift patients using conjoint analysis. Second, to test the conjoint using an internet crowdsourcing service (Amazon Mechanical Turk [MTurk]).
METHODS: Anonymous university members were asked, via mass electronic survey, to pick a surgeon for facelift surgery based on five attributes. Attribute importance and preference was calculated. Once pre-tested, the facelift, breast augmentation and combined breast/abdominal surgery surveys were administered worldwide to MTurk.
RESULTS: The university facelift cohort valued testimonials (33.9%) as the most important, followed by photos (31.6%), reputation (18.2%), pricing (14.4%), and practice years (1.9%). MTurk breast augmentation participants valued photos (35.3%), then testimonials (33.9%), reputation (15.7%), pricing (12.2%), and practice years (3%). MTurk combined breast/abdominal surgery and facelift participants valued testimonials (38.3% and 38.1%, respectively), then photos (27.9%, 29.4%), reputation (17.5%, 15.8%), pricing (13.9%, 13.9%), practice years (2.4%, 2.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast augmentation patients placed higher importance on photos; combined breast/abdominal surgery and facelift patients valued testimonials. Conjoint analysis has had limited application in plastic surgery. To our knowledge, internet crowdsourcing is a novel participant recruitment method in plastic surgery. Its unique benefits include broad, diverse and anonymous participant pools, low-cost, rapid data collection, and high completion rate.
© 2016 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651401     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  11 in total

Review 1.  Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.

Authors:  Karoline Mortensen; Taylor L Hughes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Ear Molding Therapy: Laypersons' Perceptions, Preferences, and Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Giap H Vu; Anthony Azzolini; Laura S Humphries; Daniel M Mazzaferro; Christopher L Kalmar; Carrie E Zimmerman; Jordan W Swanson; Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-07-15

3.  Orthognathic Surgery Has a Significant Positive Effect on Perceived Personality Traits and Perceived Emotional Facial Expressions in Subjects with Primary Maxillary Deficiency.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Posnick; Brian E Kinard
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-04-11

4.  The Effect of Cleft Orthognathic and Nasal Reconstruction on Perceived Social Traits.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Posnick; Srinivas M Susarla; Brian E Kinard
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale.

Authors:  Jason D Kelly; Bryan Comstock; Timothy M Kowalewski; James M Smartt
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-01-25

6.  Association Between Patient Value Systems and Physician and Practice Attributes Available Online.

Authors:  Jamie L Welshhans; Jeffrey J Harmon; Ira Papel; Richard Gentile; Devinder Mangat; Patrick Byrne; Ryan M Collar
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Consumer Awareness and Comfort with Resident-run Cosmetic Clinics: A Crowdsourcing Study.

Authors:  Kshipra Hemal; Natalie E Cignetti; Megan R Newsom; Lisa R David
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-12

8.  Crowdsourcing Public Perceptions of Plastic Surgeons: Is There a Gender Bias?

Authors:  Alexandra Bucknor; Joani Christensen; Parisa Kamali; Sabine Egeler; Charlotte van Veldhuisen; Hinne Rakhorst; Irene Mathijssen; Samuel J Lin; Heather Furnas
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-04-16

9.  Validation of Ideal Breast Characteristics With Breast Augmentation Patients.

Authors:  Jason D Kelly; Bryan Comstock; Orr Shauly; James M Smartt; Daniel J Gould
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-02-05

10.  Can We Reach a Consensus on the Appropriate Use of Before and After Photos in Breast Surgery?

Authors:  Chantal R Valiquette; Christopher R Forrest; Leila Kasrai; Kyle R Wanzel; Glykeria Martou; Brett A Beber; John L Semple; Thomas Constantine; Emily S Ho; Ron B Somogyi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.