Literature DB >> 27651390

Coronary bypass surgery versus stenting in multivessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery.

Rafael Cavalcante1,2, Yohei Sotomi3, Yaping Zeng1, Cheol Whan Lee4, Jung-Min Ahn4, Carlos Collet3, Erhan Tenekecioglu1, Pannipa Suwannasom1,3, Yoshinobu Onuma1, Seung-Jung Park4, Patrick W Serruys5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients with multivessel disease and proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) involvement, the best revascularisation strategy is still unclear. We assess outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in a pooled analysis of individual patient-level data of the SYNTAX and BEST randomised trials.
DESIGN: Proximal LAD involvement was defined by any lesion ≥ 50% diameter stenosis in the arterial segment starting from the left-main bifurcation up to (and including) the origin of the first major septal branch. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke at 5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: The present study population comprises 1166 patients of which 577 were randomised to PCI and 589 to CABG. Baseline characteristics were well balanced across study arms. The primary endpoint occurred in 94 (16.3%) patients in the PCI arm and in 68 (11.5%) patients in the CABG arm (HR 1.43; 95%CI 1.05 to 1.95; p=0.026). CABG was also associated with a significantly lower rate of cardiac death (p=0.007), MI (p<0.001), all-cause revascularisation (p<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (all-cause death, MI, stroke, revascularisation) (p<0.001). The rates of all-cause mortality (p=0.06) and stroke (p=0.09) were not statistically different between the two groups. The overall study results for the primary outcome were consistent across several subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multivessel disease with proximal LAD involvement, CABG is associated with lower rates of the safety composite endpoint of death, MI or stroke as compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents at 5 years of follow-up (number needed to treat=21). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PRECOMBAT clinicaltrials.gov NCT00997828; SYNTAX: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00114972 NCT00114972. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651390     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  4 in total

1.  Optimal revascularization for left main coronary artery disease-coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ian C Bostock; Jock N McCullough; Alexander Iribarne
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of multivessel coronary disease: quo vadis? -a review of the evidences on coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Cristiano Spadaccio; Umberto Benedetto
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07

Review 3.  The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew A Brown; Seth Klusewitz; John Elefteriades; Lindsey Prescher
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Hybrid coronary revascularization vs. percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Yi-Feng Wu; Kimberly Cozzens; Jacqueline Tamis-Holland; Frederick S K Ling; Alice K Jacobs; Ferdinand J Venditti; Peter B Berger; Gary Walford; Spencer B King Iii
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.