Fritz C Roller1, Christoph Wiedenroth2, Andreas Breithecker3, Christoph Liebetrau4, Eckhard Mayer2, Christian Schneider3, Andreas Rolf4, Christian Hamm4,5, Gabriele A Krombach3. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. fritz.c.roller@radiol.med.uni-giessen.de. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. 4. Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany. 5. Department of Cardiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess septal and right ventricular insertion point (RVIP) fibrosis in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) via native T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) determination and to analyze correlations with functional parameters. METHODS: Imaging was performed at 1.5 Tesla in 24 patients diagnosed with CTEPH and 24 controls. T1 values were measured within the septal myocardium, the upper and lower RVIP, and the lateral wall at basal short axis section. RESULTS: The mean septal native T1 values were 1012.8 ms ± 50.5 in the CTEPH group and 956.9 ms ± 24.4 in controls (p < 0.001), upper RIVP 1050.8 ms ± 64.2 vs. 965.3 ms ± 37.1 (p < 0.001), and lower RVIP 1084.4 ms ± 93.1 vs. 959.8 ms ± 40.4 (p < 0.001). The corresponding mean ECV values were also significantly increased in the CTEPH group (p < 0.001). Native septal T1 showed a strong negative correlation with right ventricular ejection fraction (k = -0.92; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that native T1 mapping and ECV assessment enable visualization and quantification of septal fibrosis in CTEPH patients. The results also correlate well with right ventricular ejection fraction. Therefore, these parameters might be useful for prognosis and as therapy-monitoring tool in the future. KEY POINTS: • Septal native T1 and ECV values are significantly higher in CTEPH patients. • Native T1 and ECV values are elevated even in absence of LGE. • These techniques therefore enable an improved quantification of septal fibrosis in CTEPH. • Native T1 values also correlate well with right ventricular EF and PA-pressure. • Prognosis and therapy-monitoring might be assessable in the future with these parameters.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess septal and right ventricular insertion point (RVIP) fibrosis in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) via native T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) determination and to analyze correlations with functional parameters. METHODS: Imaging was performed at 1.5 Tesla in 24 patients diagnosed with CTEPH and 24 controls. T1 values were measured within the septal myocardium, the upper and lower RVIP, and the lateral wall at basal short axis section. RESULTS: The mean septal native T1 values were 1012.8 ms ± 50.5 in the CTEPH group and 956.9 ms ± 24.4 in controls (p < 0.001), upper RIVP 1050.8 ms ± 64.2 vs. 965.3 ms ± 37.1 (p < 0.001), and lower RVIP 1084.4 ms ± 93.1 vs. 959.8 ms ± 40.4 (p < 0.001). The corresponding mean ECV values were also significantly increased in the CTEPH group (p < 0.001). Native septal T1 showed a strong negative correlation with right ventricular ejection fraction (k = -0.92; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that native T1 mapping and ECV assessment enable visualization and quantification of septal fibrosis in CTEPHpatients. The results also correlate well with right ventricular ejection fraction. Therefore, these parameters might be useful for prognosis and as therapy-monitoring tool in the future. KEY POINTS: • Septal native T1 and ECV values are significantly higher in CTEPHpatients. • Native T1 and ECV values are elevated even in absence of LGE. • These techniques therefore enable an improved quantification of septal fibrosis in CTEPH. • Native T1 values also correlate well with right ventricular EF and PA-pressure. • Prognosis and therapy-monitoring might be assessable in the future with these parameters.
Authors: Gérald Simonneau; Ivan M Robbins; Maurice Beghetti; Richard N Channick; Marion Delcroix; Christopher P Denton; C Gregory Elliott; Sean P Gaine; Mark T Gladwin; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Michael J Krowka; David Langleben; Norifumi Nakanishi; Rogério Souza Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marius M Hoeper; Harm Jan Bogaard; Robin Condliffe; Robert Frantz; Dinesh Khanna; Marcin Kurzyna; David Langleben; Alessandra Manes; Toru Satoh; Fernando Torres; Martin R Wilkins; David B Badesch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Marion Delcroix; Irene Lang; Eckhard Mayer; Pavel Jansa; David Ambroz; Carmen Treacy; Andrea M D'Armini; Marco Morsolini; Repke Snijder; Paul Bresser; Adam Torbicki; Bent Kristensen; Jerzy Lewczuk; Iveta Simkova; Joan A Barberà; Marc de Perrot; Marius M Hoeper; Sean Gaine; Rudolf Speich; Miguel A Gomez-Sanchez; Gabor Kovacs; Abdul Monem Hamid; Xavier Jaïs; Gérald Simonneau Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ronald J Raymond; Alan L Hinderliter; Park W Willis; David Ralph; Edgar J Caldwell; William Williams; Neil A Ettinger; Nicholas S Hill; Warren R Summer; Bennett de Boisblanc; Todd Schwartz; Gary Koch; Linda M Clayton; Maria M Jöbsis; James W Crow; Walker Long Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Steve Bandula; Steven K White; Andrew S Flett; David Lawrence; Francesca Pugliese; Michael T Ashworth; Shonit Punwani; Stuart A Taylor; James C Moon Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter Kellman; Joel R Wilson; Hui Xue; W Patricia Bandettini; Sujata M Shanbhag; Kirk M Druey; Martin Ugander; Andrew E Arai Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Yin Yin Chen; Hong Yun; Hang Jin; De Hong Kong; Yu Liang Long; Cai Xia Fu; Shan Yang; Meng Su Zeng Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: F C Roller; S Kriechbaum; A Breithecker; C Liebetrau; M Haas; C Schneider; A Rolf; S Guth; E Mayer; C Hamm; G A Krombach; C B Wiedenroth Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Fawaz Alenezi; Taylor A Covington; Monica Mukherjee; Stephen C Mathai; Paul B Yu; Sudarshan Rajagopal Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Yang Dong; Jiayu Sun; Dan Yang; Juan He; Wei Cheng; Ke Wan; Hong Liu; Andreas Greiser; Xiaoyue Zhou; Yuchi Han; Yucheng Chen Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-03-31 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Samer Alabed; Pankaj Garg; Christopher S Johns; Faisal Alandejani; Yousef Shahin; Krit Dwivedi; Hamza Zafar; James M Wild; David G Kiely; Andrew J Swift Journal: Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep Date: 2020-11-07
Authors: Laura C Saunders; Chris S Johns; Neil J Stewart; Charlotte J E Oram; David A Capener; Valentina O Puntmann; Charlie A Elliot; Robin C Condliffe; David G Kiely; Martin J Graves; Jim M Wild; Andy J Swift Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Stanislav Keranov; Saskia Haen; Julia Vietheer; Wiebke Rutsatz; Jan-Sebastian Wolter; Steffen D Kriechbaum; Beatrice von Jeinsen; Pascal Bauer; Khodr Tello; Manuel Richter; Oliver Dörr; Andreas J Rieth; Holger Nef; Christian W Hamm; Christoph Liebetrau; Andreas Rolf; Till Keller Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-11-24