| Literature DB >> 27651131 |
Chantal A Boly1,2, Etto C Eringa3, R Arthur Bouwman4, Rob F P van den Akker5,3, Frances S de Man3,6, Ingrid Schalij3,6, Stephan A Loer5, Christa Boer5, Charissa E van den Brom5,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While most studies focus on cardiovascular morbidity following anesthesia and surgery in excessive obesity, it is unknown whether these intraoperative cardiovascular alterations also occur in milder forms of adiposity without type 2 diabetes and if insulin is a possible treatment to improve intraoperative myocardial performance. In this experimental study we investigated whether mild adiposity without metabolic alterations is already associated with cardiometabolic dysfunction during anesthesia, mechanical ventilation and surgery and whether these myocardial alterations can be neutralized by intraoperative insulin treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Adiposity; Insulin; Myocardial contraction; Myocardial perfusion; Perioperative period
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27651131 PMCID: PMC5029087 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-016-0453-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1Experimental protocol. After induction of anesthesia and cannulation of vessels mice underwent contrast-enhanced echocardiography at baseline and after insulin treatment (group A), or pressure–volume loop analysis at baseline (group B) and after insulin treatment (group C)
Fig. 2Typical examples of echocardiography and pressure–volume loops measurements in control (a) and western diet-fed (b) mice. Echocardiography windows are short axis midpapillary views which where used for estimation of fractional shortening, and demonstrated pressure volume loops were used for estimation of end-systolic (striped line) and end-diastolic (dotted line) pressure–volume relation estimations and related parameters
Metabolic characteristics of control and WD-fed mice
| Control | WD-fed | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 23.8 ± 0.8 | 27.0 ± 1.2 | < |
| Tibia length (mm) | 17.2 ± 0.4 | 17.1 ± 0.4 | 0.66 |
| Caloric intake (g/kg/week) | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | < |
| Non-fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 11.5 ± 1.9 | 11.8 ± 1.8 | 0.47 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 0.18 |
| Heart weight (mg) | 103.1 ± 4.0 | 127.4 ± 16.0 |
|
| Left ventricular weight (mg) | 79.5 ± 4.1 | 102.0 ± 15.8 |
|
| Right ventricular weight (mg) | 19.1 ± 2.7 | 20.8 ± 4.0 | 0.34 |
| Epididymal adipose tissue (mg) | 184.3 ± 32.3 | 308.0 ± 119.1 | 0.01* |
| Perirenal adipose tissue (mg) | 50.8 ± 10.2 | 84.5 ± 48.1 | 0.07 |
| Epicardial adipose tissue (mg) | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 7.2 ± 6.3 | 0.05 |
| Plasma insulin (ng/mL) | 2.71 ± 1.31 | 3.16 ± 1.06 | 0.85 |
| Plasma triglycerides (ng/mL) | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.40 |
| Plasma free fatty acids (nmol/mL) | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.51 |
| Oral glucose tolerance test AUC | 1549 ± 68 | 1823 ± 156 | 0.13 |
| Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp | |||
| Steady state blood glucose (mmoll/L) | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 0.42 |
| Glucose infusion rate (mg/min/kg) | 25 ± 2.2 | 24 ± 2.8 | 0.73 |
Metabolic characteristics of control and WD-fed mice. AUC area under the curve. Data are presented as mean ± SD and n = 8–12 per group. Data were analyzed using a Student’s t test for between-group comparisons and 2-way ANOVA with repeated measurements for the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
Baseline hemodynamics for control and WD-fed mice
| Control | WD-fed | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 66 ± 17 | 61 ± 19 | 0.34 |
| Heart rate (BPM) | 604 ± 120 | 670 ± 65 | 0.18 |
| Stroke volume (μL) | 45 ± 11 | 36 ± 7 | 0.07 |
| Cardiac output (mL/min) | 26.8 ± 8.4 | 24.4 ± 3.6 | 0.46 |
| End-systolic pressure (mmHg) | 67 ± 16 | 61 ± 19 | 0.46 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD and n = 6–12 per group. Student t test, * p < 0.05
Myocardial function and perfusion parameters in WD-fed mice compared to controls
| Control | WD-fed | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fractional shortening (%) | 56 ± 8 | 43 ± 6 | < |
| End-systolic elastance (Ees; mmHg/μL) | 4.1 ± 2.4 | 2.0 ± 0.5 |
|
| Arterial elastance (Ea; afterload; mmHg/μL) | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 0.51 |
| Ventriculo-arterial coupling (Ees/Ea ratio) | 2.5 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 0.6 |
|
| Beta (diastolic stiffness; mmHg/μL) | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.03* |
|
| Myocardial perfusion | |||
| Microvascular flow velocity β (sec−1) | 0.49 ± 0.20 | 0.59 ± 0.30 | 0.24 |
| Microvascular blood volume A (A.U.) | 0.014 ± 0.006 | 0.008 ± 0.005* |
|
| Estimate of myocardial perfusion (A × β) | 0.007 ± 0.005 | 0.004 ± 0.003* |
|
Data are presented as mean ± SD and n = 6–12 per group. Student t test, * p < 0.05
Hemodynamic response during insulin treatment in WD-fed animals
| Baseline | After insulin treatment | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 61 ± 19 | 63 ± 12 | 0.91 |
| Heart rate (BPM) | 669 ± 65 | 593 ± 73 |
|
| Stroke volume (μL) | 36 ± 7 | 39 ± 10 | 0.45 |
| Cardiac output (mL/min) | 24.4 ± 3.6 | 23.1 ± 6.4 | 0.58 |
| End-systolic pressure (mmHg) | 61 ± 19 | 43 ± 18 |
|
Data are presented as mean ± SD and n = 7–10 per group. Student t test, * p < 0.05
Fig. 3Cardiac function and perfusion response to insulin treatment in WD-fed mice. Cardiac systolic (a), and diastolic (b) function and perfusion (c) responses to insulin treatment. Data are mean ± SD and n = 7–10 per group. Paired t test for perfusion-related parameters, Student t test for other parameters, *p < 0.05