Literature DB >> 27651124

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion using different technologies in the United Kingdom: A multicenter registry.

Timothy R Betts1, Milena Leo1, Sandeep Panikker2, Prapa Kanagaratnam3, Michael Koa-Wing3, David Wyn Davies3, David Hildick-Smith4, Dylan G Wynne4, Oliver Ormerod1, Oliver R Segal5, Anthony W Chow5, Derick Todd6, Sandra Cabrera Gomez6, Graeme J Kirkwood7, David Fox7, Chris Pepper8, John Foran2, Tom Wong2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at assessing the feasibility and long-term efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in a "real world" setting.
BACKGROUND: Although LAAO has recently emerged as an alternative to oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke, "real world" data about the procedure with different devices are lacking.
METHODS: Eight centers in the United Kingdom contributed to a retrospective registry for LAAO procedures undertaken between July 2009 and November 2014.
RESULTS: A total of 371 patients (72.9 ± 8.3 years old, 88.9% males) were enrolled. The overall procedure success was 92.5%, with major events in 3.5% of cases. The device choice was Watchman in 63% of cases, Amplatzer Cardiac Plug in 34.7%, Lariat in 1.7%, and Coherex WaveCrest in 0.6%. A significant improvement in procedure success (from 89.2% to 95.7%; P = 0.018) and reduction of acute major complications (from 6.5% to 0.5%; P = 0.001) were observed between procedures in the first and the second half of the recruitment time. An annual 90.1% relative risk reduction (RRR) for ischemic stroke, an 87.2% thromboembolic events RRR, and a 92.9% major bleeding RRR were observed, if compared with the predicted annual risks based on CHADS2, CHA2DS2-Vasc, and HAS-BLED scores, respectively, over a follow-up period of 24.7 ± 16.07 months.
CONCLUSIONS: LAAO can be performed safely in a real world setting with good implant success rates and procedural outcomes. The long-term benefits of the procedure are reassuring in terms of both ischemic events and avoidance of severe bleeding associated with anticoagulation in this patient group.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; left atrial appendage occlusion; thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651124     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

1.  Observed versus Expected Ischemic and Bleeding Events Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Authors:  Tatiana Busu; Safi U Khan; Muhammad Alhajji; Fahad Alqahtani; David R Holmes; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Short-Term Antiplatelet Versus Anticoagulant Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Osman; Tatiana Busu; Khansa Osman; Safi U Khan; Matthew Daniels; David R Holmes; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-29

Review 3.  Late discovery of left atrial appendage occluder device embolization: a case report.

Authors:  Mohamad Jihad Mansour; Clément Bénic; Romain Didier; Antoine Noel; Martine Gilard; Jacques Mansourati
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Long term outcomes after left atrial appendage closure with the LARIAT device-Stroke risk reduction over five years follow-up.

Authors:  Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Magdalena Bartus; Marian Burysz; Maciej Brzeziński; Piotr Suwalski; Boguslaw Kapelak; Venkat Vuddanda; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Randall J Lee; Rafal Trabka; Krzysztof Bartus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison between Amulet and Watchman left atrial appendage closure devices: A real-world, single center experience.

Authors:  Mohammed Saad; Osama Risha; Makoto Sano; Thomas Fink; Christian-Hendrik Heeger; Julia Vogler; Vanessa Sciacca; Charlotte Eitel; Thomas Stiermaier; Alexander Joost; Ahmad Keelani; Georg Fuernau; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ingo Eitel; Roland Richard Tilz
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-10-19

Review 6.  Clinical follow-up of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation ineligible of oral anticoagulation treatment-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frida Labori; Carl Bonander; Josefine Persson; Mikael Svensson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Habib Rehman Khan; Ines Kralj-Hans; Shouvik Haldar; Toufan Bahrami; Jonathan Clague; Anthony De Souza; Darrel Francis; Wajid Hussain; Julian Jarman; David Gareth Jones; Neeraj Mediratta; Raad Mohiaddin; Tushar Salukhe; Simon Jones; Joanne Lord; Caroline Murphy; Joanna Kelly; Vias Markides; Dhiraj Gupta; Tom Wong
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Left Atrial Appendages Occlusion: Current Status and Prospective.

Authors:  Sharan Prakash Sharma; Peter Park; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Left atrial appendage occlusion in the UK: prospective registry and data linkage to Hospital Episode Statistics.

Authors:  Iain Willits; Kim Keltie; Nicholas Linker; Mark de Belder; Robert Henderson; Hannah Patrick; Helen Powell; Lee Berry; Samuel G Urwin; Helen Cole; Andrew J Sims
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2021-09-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.