Literature DB >> 27651035

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization.

Devraj Sukul1, Milan Seth1, Simon R Dixon2, Mark Zainea3, Nicklaus K Slocum4, Elizabeth J Pielsticker5, Hitinder S Gurm1,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients turned down for surgical revascularization across a broad population.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest that surgical ineligibility is associated with increased mortality in patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI.
METHODS: This study included consecutive patients who underwent PCI in a multicenter registry in Michigan from January 2010 to December 2014. Surgical ineligibility required documentation indicating that a cardiac surgeon deemed the patient ineligible for surgery. In-hospital outcomes included mortality (primary outcome), cardiogenic shock, cerebrovascular accident, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), and a new requirement for dialysis (NRD).
RESULTS: Of 99,370 patients at 33 hospitals with on-site surgical backup, 1,922 (1.9%) were surgically ineligible. The rate of ineligibility did not vary by hospital (range: 1.5-2.5%; P = 0.79). Overall, there were no major differences in baseline characteristics or outcomes between surgically ineligible patients and the rest (i.e., nonineligible patients): mortality (0.52% vs. 0.52%; P > 0.5), cardiogenic shock (0.68% vs. 0.73%; P > 0.5), cerebrovascular accident (0.05% vs. 0.19%; P = 0.28), NRD (0.16% vs. 0.19%; P > 0.5), CIN (2.7% vs. 2.3%; P = 0.27). Among 1,074 patients who underwent unprotected left main PCI, 20 (1.9%) were surgically ineligible and experienced increased rates of mortality (20.0% vs. 5.3%; P = 0.022; adjusted OR = 7.38; P < 0.001) and other complications as compared to the remainder.
CONCLUSIONS: PCI in a broad population of surgically ineligible patients is generally safe. However, among patients who underwent unprotected left main PCI, those deemed surgically ineligible experienced significantly worse outcomes as compared to the rest.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary artery disease; health care outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); risk stratification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651035     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Nonemergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on an Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Supported with Impella® Heart Pump in Patients Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization.

Authors:  Perwaiz M Meraj; Simon Dixon; Jeffery Moses; Karim Ibrahim; Andreas Schäfer; Ibrahim Akin; Jonathan Hill; Theodore Schreiber; William W O'Neill
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 2.  A Review of the Impella Devices.

Authors:  Rami Zein; Chirdeep Patel; Adrian Mercado-Alamo; Theodore Schreiber; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 3.  Surgical Turned-Downed CHIP Cases-Can PCI Save the Day?

Authors:  Alexandru Achim; Madalin Marc; Zoltan Ruzsa
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.