Judit Karacsonyi1,2, Dimitri Karmpaliotis3, Khaldoon Alaswad4, Farouc A Jaffer5, Robert W Yeh6, Mitul Patel7, John Bahadorani7, Anthony Doing8, Ziad A Ali3, Aris Karatasakis1, Barbara A Danek1, Bavana V Rangan1, Aya J Alame1, Subhash Banerjee1, Emmanouil S Brilakis1,9. 1. VA North Texas Healthcare System and UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 2. Division of Invasive Cardiology, Second Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. 3. Columbia University, New York, New York. 4. Henry Ford Hospital, Cardiology Department, Detroit, Michigan. 5. Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. VA San Diego Healthcare System and University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 8. Medical Center of the Rockies, Loveland, Colorado. 9. Minnepolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Balloon uncrossable lesions can be challenging to treat, requiring specialized techniques and equipment. METHODS: We examined the prevalence, clinical and angiographic characteristics, management and procedural outcomes of balloon uncrossable lesions in a multicenter chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, 718 CTO PCIs (in which the occlusion was successfully crossed with a guidewire) were performed in 701 patients at 11 US centers. Mean age was 65.6 ± 10 years and 84% of the patients were men. Balloon uncrossable lesions represented 9% of all CTOs. Balloon uncrossable CTOs had more moderate/severe calcification (82% vs. 52%, P < 0.0001), moderate/severe tortuosity (61% vs. 35% P < 0.0001) and higher J-CTO score (2.95 ± 1.32 vs. 2.43 ± 1.23, P = 0.005) as compared with the remaining lesions. Technical and procedural success was significantly lower for balloon uncrossable lesions (90.5% vs. 98.3%, P < 0.0001 and 88.9% vs. 96.6% P = 0.004), respectively, but the incidence of major adverse events was similar (1.6% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.751). Balloon uncrossable lesions required longer procedure (208 [interquartile range: 135, 258] vs. 135 [94, 194] min, P < 0.0001) and fluoroscopy (77 [52, 100] vs. 45 min [27, 75], P < 0.0001) time. Techniques used to treat balloon uncrossable lesions included balloon-assisted microdissection (23%), excimer laser atherectomy (18%), and rotational atherectomy (16%). Excimer laser atherectomy and balloon-assisted microdissection were associated with the highest technical and procedural success rates. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon uncrossable CTOs are common, are associated with high rates of technical failure, and require specialized techniques for successful treatment.
BACKGROUND: Balloon uncrossable lesions can be challenging to treat, requiring specialized techniques and equipment. METHODS: We examined the prevalence, clinical and angiographic characteristics, management and procedural outcomes of balloon uncrossable lesions in a multicenter chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, 718 CTO PCIs (in which the occlusion was successfully crossed with a guidewire) were performed in 701 patients at 11 US centers. Mean age was 65.6 ± 10 years and 84% of the patients were men. Balloon uncrossable lesions represented 9% of all CTOs. Balloon uncrossable CTOs had more moderate/severe calcification (82% vs. 52%, P < 0.0001), moderate/severe tortuosity (61% vs. 35% P < 0.0001) and higher J-CTO score (2.95 ± 1.32 vs. 2.43 ± 1.23, P = 0.005) as compared with the remaining lesions. Technical and procedural success was significantly lower for balloon uncrossable lesions (90.5% vs. 98.3%, P < 0.0001 and 88.9% vs. 96.6% P = 0.004), respectively, but the incidence of major adverse events was similar (1.6% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.751). Balloon uncrossable lesions required longer procedure (208 [interquartile range: 135, 258] vs. 135 [94, 194] min, P < 0.0001) and fluoroscopy (77 [52, 100] vs. 45 min [27, 75], P < 0.0001) time. Techniques used to treat balloon uncrossable lesions included balloon-assisted microdissection (23%), excimer laser atherectomy (18%), and rotational atherectomy (16%). Excimer laser atherectomy and balloon-assisted microdissection were associated with the highest technical and procedural success rates. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon uncrossable CTOs are common, are associated with high rates of technical failure, and require specialized techniques for successful treatment.
Authors: Peter Tajti; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; Catalin Toma; James W Choi; Farouc A Jaffer; Anthony H Doing; Mitul Patel; Ehtisham Mahmud; Barry Uretsky; Aris Karatasakis; Judit Karacsonyi; Barbara A Danek; Bavana V Rangan; Subhash Banerjee; Imre Ungi; Emmanouil S Brilakis Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Peter Tajti; Iosif Xenogiannis; Dimitris Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; Farouc A Jaffer; M Nicholas Burke; Imre Ungi; Emmanouil S Brilakis Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 2.931