| Literature DB >> 27650390 |
Samuel Wanji1,2, Jonas A Kengne-Ouafo3,4, Fabrice R Datchoua-Poutcheu4, Abdel Jelil Njouendou3,4, Dizzel Bita Tayong3,4, David D Sofeu-Feugaing4,5, Nathalie Amvongo-Adjia4,6, Bridget A Fovennso3,4, Yolande F Longang-Tchounkeu4, Fasil Tekola-Ayele7, Peter A Enyong3,4, Melanie J Newport8, Gail Davey8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The suitability of using clinical assessment to identify patients with podoconiosis in endemic communities has previously been demonstrated. In this study, we explored the feasibility and accuracy of using Community Health Implementers (CHIs) for the large scale clinical screening of the population for podoconiosis in North-west Cameroon.Entities:
Keywords: Cameroon; Community Health Implementers; Podoconiosis; Predictive value; Screening
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27650390 PMCID: PMC5029032 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3669-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Map of the study site
Participants trained per health district in the North-West region of Cameroon
| Health District | Number of Health Areas targeted | No of COCs trained | No of CHIs trained |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAFUT | 9 | 10 | 18 |
| BAMENDA | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| BATIBO | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| MBENGWI | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| NDOP | 14 | 15 | 103 |
| TUBAH | 9 | 10 | 48 |
| TOTAL | 42 | 50 | 193 |
COCs Chiefs of Centre, CHIs Community Health Workers
Podoconiosis prevalence within the surveyed Health District
| Health District | Communities surveyed | Number registered 20a-10b (years) | Podoconiosis cases | Prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAFUT | 23 | 6077 | 304 | 5.1 |
| BAMENDA | 21 | 12,457 | 134 | 1.1 |
| BATIBO | 12 | 2918 | 227 | 7.7 |
| MBENGWI | 11 | 1865 | 50 | 2.7 |
| NDOP | 75 | 25,601 | 232 | 0.9 |
| TUBAH | 30 | 7561 | 122 | 1.6 |
| Total | 172 | 56,479 | 1069 | 1.9 |
apeople who were more than 20 years old
bthose who have lived in the community for more than 10 years
Relationship between CHIs’ and researchers’ screening for podoconiosis in North West Cameroon
| Health District | Expected cases invited (by CHIs) | Expected cases Present | Confirmed cases | Predictive valuea (Based on confirmed cases and number present for validation) (%) | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAFUT | 304 | 86 | 30 | 34.9 | 0.24(0.12–0.56) | <0.0001 |
| BAMENDA | 134 | 45 | 19 | 42.2 | 0.32(0.15–0.70) | 0.0034 |
| BATIBO | 227 | 44 | 15 | 34.1 | 0.23(0.10–0.51) | 0.0002 |
| BENGWI | 50 | 23 | 12 | 52.2 | 0.48(0.19–1.25) | 0.13 |
| NDOP | 232 | 75 | 52 | 70.0 | Ref | Ref |
| TUBAH | 122 | 53 | 30 | 57.0 | 0.58(0.28–1.20) | 0.14 |
| Overall total | 1069 | 326 | 158 | 48.5 |
aχ2 = 25.30, P = 0.0001
Odd of accurately detecting podoconiosis by CHIs taking stage 2 (early disease stage) as reference
| Disease stage | Correct | Incorrect | OR (95% confidence interval) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 2 | 33 | 75 | Ref | Ref |
| Stage 3 | 28 | 33 | 1.928 [1.01–3.69] | 0.047 |
| Stage 4 | 9 | 11 | 1.860 [0.70–4.91] | 0.211 |
| Stage 5 | 4 | 1 | 9.091 [0.97–84.47] | 0.052 |
| Advanced stages (3,4,5) | 41 | 45 | 2.07 [1.15–3.75] | 0.015 |
Percent agreement expressed per podoconiosis stage
| Severity of the affection | Expected cases invited (by CHIs) | Expected Cases Present | Confirmed cases | Predictive value (Based on confirmed cases and number present for validation) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 2 | 304 | 108 | 33 | 31 |
| Stage 3 | 207 | 61 | 28 | 46 |
| Stage 4 | 59 | 20 | 9 | 45 |
| Stage 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 80 |