Literature DB >> 27650228

Vitamin D Supplementation: Not So Simple in Sarcoidosis.

Amik Sodhi1, Thomas Aldrich2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Americans are increasingly receiving vitamin D supplementation, often based on low-measured 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OH-vit D). In sarcoidosis, there is often increased metabolism of 25-OH-vit D to 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D (1,25-OH-vit D), so 25-OH-vit D may remain low, despite high levels of 1,25-OH-vit D. In such cases, vitamin D supplementation may lead to hypercalcemia.
METHODS: We randomly selected 196 patients with sarcoidosis who received at least 1 prescription of vitamin D between 2005 and 2011 and 196 control patients. Primary outcome was the incidence of hypercalcemia during the 2 years following the vitamin D prescription. A secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who had received vitamin D prescriptions and who had adequate blood work performed before the prescription.
RESULTS: The 25-OH-vit D and 1,25-OH-vit D levels were measured in only 70% and 23%, respectively, of those receiving supplementation. Hypercalcemia was noted more frequently in the group that received vitamin D (42.3%) as compared with the nonsupplemented group (18.3%), P < 0.0001. Patients who received a vitamin D prescription developed moderate and severe hypercalcemia more frequently (12.8%) as compared to the group that did not receive vitamin D (3.6%), P = 0.001. In multivariate analysis, having a prescription for vitamin D increased the risk of developing hypercalcemia to approximately 2-fold. The risk of developing hypercalcemia (odds ratio = 4.1) was increased with renal failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that a substantial proportion of patients with sarcoidosis who receive vitamin D are not getting appropriate pretesting. This increases their risk for developing hypercalcemia.
Copyright © 2016 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypercalcemia; Sarcoidosis; Vitamin D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27650228     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  7 in total

1.  Vitamin D status in sarcoidosis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilias C Papanikolaou; Brian Tabila; Kristina Tabila; Zea Borok; Om Sharma; Michael K Gould
Journal:  Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 0.670

2.  A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study and Systematic Review of Necrobiotic Xanthogranuloma With Proposed Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Caroline A Nelson; Connie S Zhong; David A Hashemi; Hovik J Ashchyan; Zoe Brown-Joel; Megan H Noe; Sotonye Imadojemu; Robert G Micheletti; Ruth Ann Vleugels; Karolyn A Wanat; Misha Rosenbach; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  Renal sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Marta Calatroni; Gabriella Moroni; Francesco Reggiani; Claudio Ponticelli
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.393

Review 4.  Corticosteroid use in chronic dermatologic disorders and osteoporosis.

Authors:  Beatrice C Lupsa; Karl L Insogna; Robert G Micheletti; Avrom Caplan
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-15

5.  Serum and urinary calcium level in Latvian patients with sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Ieva Ruža; Zane Lucāne
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2018-12-23

6.  Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention or depletion of side effects of therapy with alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hans-Klaus Goischke
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 7.  Sarcoidosis and calcium homeostasis disturbances-Do we know where we stand?

Authors:  Łukasz Gwadera; Adam Jerzy Białas; Mikołaj Aleksander Iwański; Paweł Górski; Wojciech Jerzy Piotrowski
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.444

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.