| Literature DB >> 27649628 |
Oliver Domenig1, Arndt Manzel2, Nadja Grobe3, Eva Königshausen4, Christopher C Kaltenecker1, Johannes J Kovarik1, Johannes Stegbauer4, Susan B Gurley5, Dunja van Oyen6, Marlies Antlanger1, Michael Bader7, Daisy Motta-Santos8, Robson A Santos9, Khalid M Elased3, Marcus D Säemann1, Ralf A Linker2, Marko Poglitsch6.
Abstract
Cardiovascular and renal pathologies are frequently associated with an activated renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) and increased levels of its main effector and vasoconstrictor hormone angiotensin II (Ang II). Angiotensin-converting-enzyme-2 (ACE2) has been described as a crucial enzymatic player in shifting the RAS towards its so-called alternative vasodilative and reno-protective axis by enzymatically converting Ang II to angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)). Yet, the relative contribution of ACE2 to Ang-(1-7) formation in vivo has not been elucidated. Mass spectrometry based quantification of angiotensin metabolites in the kidney and plasma of ACE2 KO mice surprisingly revealed an increase in Ang-(1-7), suggesting additional pathways to be responsible for alternative RAS activation in vivo. Following assessment of angiotensin metabolism in kidney homogenates, we identified neprilysin (NEP) to be a major source of renal Ang-(1-7) in mice and humans. These findings were supported by MALDI imaging, showing NEP mediated Ang-(1-7) formation in whole kidney cryo-sections in mice. Finally, pharmacologic inhibition of NEP resulted in strongly decreased Ang-(1-7) levels in murine kidneys. This unexpected new role of NEP may have implications for the combination therapy with NEP-inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor-blockade, which has been shown being a promising therapeutic approach for heart failure therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27649628 PMCID: PMC5030486 DOI: 10.1038/srep33678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Elevated Ang-(1-7) levels in kidneys of ACE2 KO mice.
(a) Kidney angiotensin concentrations of wild-type (C57BL/6) and ACE2 knockout (ACE2 KO) mice (pg/g gram net weight). n = 8 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. Two-tailed Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 vs. wild-type. (b) Relative mRNA abundance (to beta actin) of renin in murine renal medulla (dark grey) and cortex (light grey) of wild-type and ACE2 KO. n = 8 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). *P < 0.05 vs. medulla. (c) Renal renin activity of wild-type (black) ACE2 KO (white) assayed by Ang I formation determination in homogenates following recombinant murine angiotensinogen spiking. n = 4 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. Two-tailed Student’s t-test. not significant (NS) vs. wild-type.
Ratios of renal angiotensin metabolites (pg/g) in wild-type and ACE2 knockout (ACE2 KO) mice.
| Angiotensin Ratio | Wild-type | ACE2 KO |
|---|---|---|
| Ang-(1-7)/Ang I (x100) | 14.3 ± 10.5 | 11.0 ± 5.7 |
| Ang-(1-7)/Ang II (x100) | 8.4 ± 4.3 | 12.6 ± 4.9 |
Data are mean ± s.e.m. of n = 8.
Figure 2Analysis of angiotensin metabolism in kidney homogenates of mice (a–c) and human (d–f ). (a) Renal Ang II turnover to Ang-(1-7) of wild-type (black) and ACE2 KO mice (white) in presence and absence of specific inhibitors. n = 4 per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). *P < 0.001 within wild-type group vs. solvent control. (b) Ang I turnover to Ang-(1-7) (left) and Ang II (right) of wild-type (black) and ACE2 KO (white). n = 4 per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). *P < 0.001 vs. solvent control. (c) Enzymatic contribution to Ang II or Ang-(1-7) formation in mice was calculated on the inhibitor sensitive angiotensin formation rate of fig. 2a,b. Data presented as mean ± s.d. (d) Human renal Ang II turnover to Ang-(1-7) in presence and absence of specific inhibitors. n = 5 per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). *P < 0.001 vs. solvent control. (e) Human Ang I turnover to Ang-(1-7) (left) and Ang II (right) in kidney homogenates. n = 5 per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). *P < 0.001 vs. solvent control. (f) Enzymatic contribution to Ang II or Ang-(1-7) formation in human was calculated on the inhibitor sensitive angiotensin formation rate of fig. 2d,e. Data presented as mean ± s.d.
Figure 3MALDI-Imaging reveals DL-thiorphan-sensitive Ang-(1-7) formation in renal cortex of mice.
(a) Diminishing effect of increasing DL-thiophan concentrations (0 μM – 100 μM) on local turnover of Ang I to Ang-(1-7) is shown by MALDI-Imaging. Brighter colors of the murine kidney section indicate pronounced Ang-(1-7) formation in the renal cortex. (b) Increasing Ang-(1-7) signals depending on lisinopril concentration (0 μM–10 μM). (c) Inhibitory capacity of 100 μM DL-thiorphan on Ang I to Ang-(1-7) turnover in presence of 10 μM lisinopril (d) Intensity of Ang-(1-7) formation (Fig. 3c) was calculated and is given in bars. n = 4 per group. Data presented as mean ± s.d. Two-tailed Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05 vs. 10 μM lisinopril. (e) Schematic graph highlights the targeted angiotensin pathways of the used inhibitors.
Renal angiotensin metabolites (pg/g) and their ratios of mice treated with vehicle or LBQ657 (50 mg/kg).
| Angiotensin (pg/g) | Vehicle | LBQ657 |
|---|---|---|
| Ang-(1-7) | 74 ± 14 | 35 ± 4* |
| Ang II | 952 ± 172 | 642 ± 99 |
| Ang I | 399 ± 69 | 277 ± 31 |
| Ang-(1-9) | 249 ± 62 | 162 ± 10 |
| Ang-(2-8) | 211 ± 33 | 195 ± 28 |
| Ang-(2-10) | 147 ± 22 | 89 ± 16 |
| Ang-(1-7)/Ang I (x100) | 18.4 ± 0.59 | 13.4 ± 2.0* |
| Ang-(1-7)/Ang II (x100) | 8.1 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 1.2 |
Data are mean ± s.e.m. of n = 5.
*P < 0.05 vs. vehicle.
Equilibrium plasma angiotensin metabolites (pg/ml) and their ratios of mice treated with vehicle or LBQ657 (50 mg/kg).
| Angiotensin (pg/ml) | Vehicle | LBQ657 |
|---|---|---|
| Ang-(1-7) | 39 ± 12 | 20 ± 7 |
| Ang II | 1396 ± 294 | 1423 ± 540 |
| Ang I | 1061 ± 142 | 970 ± 341 |
| Ang-(1-5) | 84 ± 11 | 73 ± 34 |
| Ang-(2-8) | 252 ± 56 | 269 ± 91 |
| Ang-(3-8) | 101 ± 20 | 114 ± 36 |
| Ang-(1-7)/Ang I (x100) | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| Ang-(1-7)/Ang II (x100) | 3.7 ± 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
Data are mean ± s.e.m. of n = 5.