| Literature DB >> 27649616 |
K Johannesson1,2, R K Butlin2,3,4.
Abstract
It is intriguing that conspicuous colour morphs of a prey species may be maintained at low frequencies alongside cryptic morphs. Negative frequency-dependent selection by predators using search images ('apostatic selection') is often suggested without rejecting alternative explanations. Using a maximum likelihood approach we fitted predictions from models of genetic drift, migration, constant selection, heterozygote advantage or negative frequency-dependent selection to time-series data of colour frequencies in isolated populations of a marine snail (Littorina saxatilis), re-established with perturbed colour morph frequencies and followed for >20 generations. Snails of conspicuous colours (white, red, banded) are naturally rare in the study area (usually <10%) but frequencies were manipulated to levels of ~50% (one colour per population) in 8 populations at the start of the experiment in 1992. In 2013, frequencies had declined to ~15-45%. Drift alone could not explain these changes. Migration could not be rejected in any population, but required rates much higher than those recorded. Directional selection was rejected in three populations in favour of balancing selection. Heterozygote advantage and negative frequency-dependent selection could not be distinguished statistically, although overall the results favoured the latter. Populations varied idiosyncratically as mild or variable colour selection (3-11%) interacted with demographic stochasticity, and the overall conclusion was that multiple mechanisms may contribute to maintaining the polymorphisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27649616 PMCID: PMC5176118 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.77
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Figure 1Left plate shows representative shell colours of Swedish Littorina saxatilis of the wave ecotype, with red, banded and white being more conspicuous whereas tessellated and black are considered more cryptic against the background. Right plate shows snails against a cliff background. Photo: Fredrik Pleijel and Patrik Larsson.
Figure 2Map showing a small part of the archipelago on the Swedish west coast where the small intertidal skerries (2–10 m2 area) used in this study are situated. The experimental snails were all from the island Bergstugan. Replicate skerries were manipulated for white (W1–W4) and banded (B1–B3), and one skerry was manipulated for red (R).
Figure 3Frequencies of colour phenotypes in skerry populations from 4 months after the manipulation in 1992 to 2013 (solid lines). Fitted declines in frequencies under a model of frequency-dependent selection (broken lines). Populations are coded as follows. (Top) White-1, blue; White-2, green; White-3, purple; White-4, red. (Mid) Banded-1, blue; Banded-2, green; Banded-3, purple. (Bottom) Red, blue.
Tests for changes in colour frequencies after manipulation (see Figure 3) that are not consistent with drift (that is, significance indicates effects larger than drift alone)
| n | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White-1 | −0.180±0.086 | 0.812±0.098 | 9 | 4.64 | 0.277 |
| White-2 | −0.157±0.054 | 1.135±0.106 | 9 | 17.16*** | — |
| White-3 | −0.175±0.078 | 0.843±0.153 | 9 | 6.56† | 0.247 |
| White-4 | −0.151±0.080 | 0.879±0.120 | 7 | 8.46* | 0.223 |
| Banded-1 | −0.037±0.055 | 0.414±0.123 | 9 | 21.97*** | 0.484 |
| Banded-2 | −0.172±0.059 | 0.331±0.201 | 9 | 12.66** | 0.436 |
| Banded-3 | 0.061±0.048 | 0.452±0.155 | 9 | 12.55** | 0.528 |
| Red | −0.324±0.068 | 0.707±0.082 | 9 | 23.23*** | 0.249 |
Intercept and slope from a regression of phenotype frequency in a sample (P') on frequency in the preceding sample (P) (estimates on logit scale). Where the slope is <1 (that is, drift alone is rejected), an equilibrium can be inferred where the fitted regression crosses the line of no change (P'=P).
†P<0.1, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, χ2 test for improvement of the fitted model over the drift expectation of zero intercept and slope of 1 (after sequential Bonferroni correction).
Fits of models to empirical data on changing colour frequencies (Figure 3) and comparisons between models
| Parameters/test | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ΔAIC | χ12 | χ12 | χ12 | χ12 | ΔAIC |
| White-1 | 104.3 | 117.7 | 87.8 | −13.4 | 16.4*** | 18.6*** | 29.8*** | 32.0*** | 2.2 | |
| White-2 | 75.6 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 5.5 | 5.5† | 6.0* | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| White-3 | 73.7 | 72.2 | 72.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
| White-4 | 53.9 | 58.5 | 52.4 | −4.7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 6.2* | 6.8** | 0.6 | |
| White combined | 307.3 | 318.4 | 282.4 | 278.3 | −11.1 | 24.9*** | 29.1*** | 36.0*** | 40.1*** | 4.1 |
| Banded-1 | 99.5 | 98.8 | 98.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
| Banded-2 | 80.7 | 80.7 | 80.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 | |
| Banded-3 | 86.9 | 87.3 | 86.3 | −0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | |
| Banded combined | 267.2 | 266.8 | 265.7 | 263.3 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 2.4 |
| Red | 111.6 | 116.8 | 108.6 | −5.2 | 3.6† | 3.0† | 8.9** | 8.2** | −0.6 | |
Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike information criterion; DS, directional selection; FD, frequency-dependent selection; HA, heterozygote advantage; Heterozyg., heterozygote; M, migration.
Negative values indicate that the latter of the two models in the comparison had the higher likelihood value. In χ2 tests; d.f.=1 for single population model comparisons, d.f.=4 for White combined and d.f.=3 for banded combined. Bold log-likelihood estimates indicate the best models.
†P<0.1, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (after sequential Bonferroni correction for repeated tests of white and banded skerries).
Inferred parameter estimates and their confidence intervals (CIs) for the different models
| White-1 | 0.072 (0.057–0.086) | 0.92 (0.90–0.94) | 0.30 (0.05–0.54) | 0.93 (0.86–0.98) | 1.14 (1.06–1.24) | −0.70 (−0.99–(−0.45)) |
| White-2 | 0.071 (0.060–0.084) | 0.90 (0.88–0.91) | 1.00 (0.84–NA) | 1.12 (1.06–1.14) | 0.87 (0.78–0.95) | 0.075 (−0.14–0.30) |
| White-3 | 0.042 (0.030–0.054) | 0.94 (0.93–0.96) | 1.00 (0.76–NA) | 1.06 (0.99–1.08) | 0.88 (0.77–1.02) | 0.17 (−0.20–0.57) |
| White-4 | 0.061 (0.047–0.074) | 0.89 (0.86–0.91) | 0.69 (0.50–0.92) | 0.97 (0.87–1.09) | 1.16 (0.96–1.36) | −0.52 (−0.89–(–0.14)) |
| Banded-1 | 0.023 (0.013–0.033) | 0.96 (0.94–0.98) | 1.00 (0.78–NA) | 1.04 (0.95–1.07) | ||
| Banded-2 | 0.005 (0.000–0.016) | 0.97 (0.97–1.01) | 1.00 (NA–NA) | 1.01 (NA–NA) | ||
| Banded-3 | 0.015 (0.007–0.024) | 0.97 (0.96–0.99) | 0.81 (0.46–NA) | 0.95 (0.78–1.04) | 1.13 (0.83–1.47) | −0.31 (−0.95–0.29) |
| Red | 0.070 (0.061–0.086) | 0.90 (0.88–0.92) | 0.53 (NA–0.82) | 1.00 (0.94–1.07) | 1.03 (0.94–1.13) | −0.42 (−0.72–(−0.13)) |
Unreliable estimates due to poor convergence of the model fit are in italics and without CI. NA means that values reached predefined model bounds or could not be estimated. For starting frequency estimates see Supplementary Table S2.
Lower bound 0.001, upper bound 1.000.
Lower bound 0.001.