Literature DB >> 27649491

Prediction of Bone Mineral Density and Fragility Fracture by Genetic Profiling.

Thao P Ho-Le1, Jacqueline R Center2,3, John A Eisman2,3,4, Hung T Nguyen1, Tuan V Nguyen1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Although the susceptibility to fracture is partly determined by genetic factors, the contribution of newly discovered genetic variants to fracture prediction is still unclear. This study sought to define the predictive value of a genetic profiling for fracture prediction. Sixty-two bone mineral density (BMD)-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped in 557 men and 902 women who had participated in the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. The incidence of fragility fracture was ascertained from X-ray reports between 1990 and 2015. Femoral neck BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. A weighted polygenic risk score (genetic risk score [GRS]) was created as a function of the number of risk alleles and their BMD-associated regression coefficients for each SNP. The association between GRS and fracture risk was assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Individuals with greater GRS had lower femoral neck BMD (p < 0.01), but the variation in GRS accounted for less than 2% of total variance in BMD. Each unit increase in GRS was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.38) for fracture, and this association was independent of age, prior fracture, fall, and in a subset of 33 SNPs, independent of femoral neck BMD. The significant association between GRS and fracture was observed for the vertebral and wrist fractures, but not for hip fracture. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the model with GRS and clinical risk factors was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.74). With GRS, the correct reclassification of fracture versus nonfracture ranged from 12% for hip fracture to 23% for wrist fracture. A genetic profiling of BMD- associated genetic variants could improve the accuracy of fracture prediction over and above that of clinical risk factors alone, and help stratify individuals by fracture status.
© 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRACTURE; FRACTURE PREDICTION; GENETIC PROFILING; GENETIC VARIANT; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27649491     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  13 in total

1.  Machine Learning Approaches for Fracture Risk Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of Genomic and Phenotypic Data in 5130 Older Men.

Authors:  Qing Wu; Fatma Nasoz; Jongyun Jung; Bibek Bhattarai; Mira V Han
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Gene-Hormone Therapy Interaction and Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Youjin Wang; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell; Leah Preus; Kathleen M Hovey; Jing Nie; Rebecca D Jackson; Samuel K Handelman; Rami Nassir; Carolyn J Crandall; Heather M Ochs-Balcom
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Genetic profiling of decreased bone mineral density in an independent sample of Caucasian women.

Authors:  X Xiao; D Roohani; Q Wu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Improved prediction of fracture risk leveraging a genome-wide polygenic risk score.

Authors:  Tianyuan Lu; Vincenzo Forgetta; Julyan Keller-Baruch; Maria Nethander; Derrick Bennett; Marie Forest; Sahir Bhatnagar; Robin G Walters; Kuang Lin; Zhengming Chen; Liming Li; Magnus Karlsson; Dan Mellström; Eric Orwoll; Eugene V McCloskey; John A Kanis; William D Leslie; Robert J Clarke; Claes Ohlsson; Celia M T Greenwood; J Brent Richards
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  Genetic risk factors identified in populations of European descent do not improve the prediction of osteoporotic fracture and bone mineral density in Chinese populations.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Li; Cheng Peng; Ji-Gang Zhang; Wei Zhu; Chao Xu; Yong Lin; Xiao-Ying Fu; Qing Tian; Lei Zhang; Yang Xiang; Victor Sheng; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Epidemiological transition to mortality and refracture following an initial fracture.

Authors:  Thao Phuong Ho-Le; Thach S Tran; Dana Bliuc; Hanh M Pham; Steven A Frost; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  A road map for understanding molecular and genetic determinants of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tie-Lin Yang; Hui Shen; Anqi Liu; Shan-Shan Dong; Lei Zhang; Fei-Yan Deng; Qi Zhao; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 43.330

8.  BMD-Related Genetic Risk Scores Predict Site-Specific Fractures as Well as Trabecular and Cortical Bone Microstructure.

Authors:  Maria Nethander; Ulrika Pettersson-Kymmer; Liesbeth Vandenput; Mattias Lorentzon; Magnus Karlsson; Dan Mellström; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Performance of FRAX in Predicting Fractures in US Postmenopausal Women with Varied Race and Genetic Profiles.

Authors:  Qing Wu; Xiangxue Xiao; Yingke Xu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Cytokines CCL2 and CXCL1 may be potential novel predictors of early bone loss.

Authors:  Yaqian Hu; Long Wang; Zhuojie Zhao; Weiguang Lu; Jing Fan; Bo Gao; Zhuojing Luo; Qiang Jie; Xiaojuan Shi; Liu Yang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.