| Literature DB >> 27649158 |
Lauralie Mangeot-Peter1, Sylvain Legay2, Jean-Francois Hausman3, Sergio Esposito4, Gea Guerriero5.
Abstract
Gene expression profiling via quantitative real-time PCR is a robust technique widely used in the life sciences to compare gene expression patterns in, e.g., different tissues, growth conditions, or after specific treatments. In the field of plant science, real-time PCR is the gold standard to study the dynamics of gene expression and is used to validate the results generated with high throughput techniques, e.g., RNA-Seq. An accurate relative quantification of gene expression relies on the identification of appropriate reference genes, that need to be determined for each experimental set-up used and plant tissue studied. Here, we identify suitable reference genes for expression profiling in stems of textile hemp (Cannabis sativa L.), whose tissues (isolated bast fibres and core) are characterized by remarkable differences in cell wall composition. We additionally validate the reference genes by analysing the expression of putative candidates involved in the non-oxidative phase of the pentose phosphate pathway and in the first step of the shikimate pathway. The goal is to describe the possible regulation pattern of some genes involved in the provision of the precursors needed for lignin biosynthesis in the different hemp stem tissues. The results here shown are useful to design future studies focused on gene expression analyses in hemp.Entities:
Keywords: Cannabis sativa; cell wall; gene expression; lignification; reference genes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27649158 PMCID: PMC5037828 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Representative cross section of the stem of an adult hemp plant (1.5 months) showing the bast fibres with the typical G-layer. Bf: bast fibres; Par: parenchyma; Coll: collenchyma.
List of candidate reference genes used in the study. The details concerning the primer sequences, amplicon length and Tm, PCR efficiency and regression coefficient are given.
| Name | Sequence (5′→3′) | Amplicon Length (bp) | Amplicon Tm (°C) | PCR Efficiency (%) | Regression Coefficient (R2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ActinFwd | TTGCTGGTCGTGATCTTACTG | 148 | 83 | 90.8 | 0.993 |
| ActinRev | GTCTCCATCTCCTGCTCAAAG | ||||
| eTIF4EFwd | AGTGGGAAGATCCTGAATGTGC | 150 | 81 | 95.1 | 0.997 |
| eTIF4ERev | TTGCGACCACACCACAAATC | ||||
| EF2Fwd | ACGCAACAGCTATCAGGAAC | 113 | 80.3 | 92.3 | 0.998 |
| EF2Rev | TGCAAAGACACGACCAAAGG | ||||
| GAPDHFwd | AATCGCAACCCAAACTCTGC | 123 | 81.1 | 99.4 | 0.995 |
| GAPDHRev | AGTGGCCGTTGCTTTAATGG | ||||
| CycloFwd | ACAACATGTCGAACCCCAAG | 106 | 81.4 | 93.8 | 0.998 |
| CycloRev | TCAGCGGTTTTTGGCGTAAC | ||||
| RANFwd | TTTGGAGACTTCAGCACTGG | 129 | 81.8 | 97.8 | 0.998 |
| RANRev | GCAGGGTTACCATTTCCTTG | ||||
| F-boxFwd | TATCGGCGGAGAGATTTGAG | 77 | 78.4 | 99.5 | 0.975 |
| F-boxRev | TAAGCCCTTCCCTTGATTCC | ||||
| ClathrinFwd | TGTCAGTTTTGTGCCACCAG | 139 | 80.3 | 98.3 | 0.998 |
| ClathrinRev | TCCATGCGTGTTCTACCAAG | ||||
| Histone3Fwd | TGAAGAAGCCTCATCGGTTC | 127 | 82.9 | 96.1 | 0.998 |
| Histone3Rev | TCTTGAGCGATTTCCCTGAC | ||||
| TIP41Fwd | TGAACAGTGGGGAGAAAAGC | 144 | 80.3 | 100.2 | 0.989 |
| TIP41Rev | GCTTCCTGTTTCCATCCAAG | ||||
| TubulinFwd | ATAACTGTACTGGGCTTCAAGG | 110 | 84 | 97.5 | 0.999 |
| TubulinRev | CCTGTGGAGATGGGTAAACTG | ||||
| CDPKFwd | GGTGGCTTTGCTTCTCTTTG | 86 | 78.7 | 97 | 0.986 |
| CDPKRev | GTCAAACCCCTTTTCACACC | ||||
| TA1Fwd | TTCGAGAAGTTCCCTCCAAC | 118 | 81.5 | 92.8 | 0.999 |
| TA1Rev | AGCCATATCCACAGCATTCC | ||||
| TA2Fwd | CTAGCAACCCAGCGATTTTC | 126 | 81.3 | 97 | 0.998 |
| TA2Rev | ACCACAAGCTCCCAATATGC | ||||
| DHS1Fwd | TGAGACTTTCCCTCCGATTG | 144 | 84.6 | 96.8 | 0.998 |
| DHS1Rev | TCAGCACAATCTCCACCTTG | ||||
| DHS2Fwd | TATCAAGGCTGTTCGTGGAG | 129 | 81.8 | 103 | 0.997 |
| DHS2Rev | AGGTGCTTTGATGGTGTTCC |
Ranking of the 12 candidate reference genes according to the different methods used.
| GeNormPLUS | NormFinder | BestKeeper | Comparative delta- | RefFinder | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Stability Coeff. | Gene | Stability Coeff. | Gene | Stability Coeff. | Gene | Stability Coeff. | Gene | Stability Coeff. |
| 1.22 | 0.812 | 1.58 | 1.678 | 12 | |||||
| 1.135 | 0.743 | 1.085 | 1.549 | 10.462 | |||||
| 1.061 | 0.579 | 1.059 | 1.343 | 8.409 | |||||
| 1.028 | 0.523 | 0.926 | 1.335 | 6.701 | |||||
| 0.959 | 0.518 | 0.926 | 1.33 | 6.447 | |||||
| 0.857 | 0.504 | 0.888 | 1.319 | 5.948 | |||||
| 0.798 | 0.502 | 0.885 | 1.302 | 5.635 | |||||
| 0.703 | 0.462 | 0.87 | 1.299 | 4.461 | |||||
| 0.599 | 0.453 | 0.718 | 1.241 | 3.742 | |||||
| 0.503 | 0.452 | 0.699 | 1.234 | 2.913 | |||||
| 0.47 | 0.272 | 0.681 | 1.155 | 2.913 | |||||
| 0.45 | 0.257 | 0.601 | 1.091 | 1.861 | |||||
Figure 2Global ranking of the reference genes relative to hemp hurds and bast fibres generated by assigning a number (from 1 to 12) to the stability coefficients (shown in Table 2) and by averaging them. Error bars refer to the standard deviation.
Figure 3Optimal number of reference genes in hemp stem tissues as computed by geNormPLUS. Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) for (a) stem tissues; (b) bast fibres only; and (c) core only. The red dotted line represents the threshold (0.15).
Figure 4Expression analysis of TRA1, TRA2, DHS1 and DHS2 in the different stem tissues of C. sativa. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 4). Stars indicate statistically significant values at the one-way ANOVA test (* p < 0.05).