Literature DB >> 27648352

Glucose transport: meeting the metabolic demands of cancer, and applications in glioblastoma treatment.

Collin M Labak1, Paul Y Wang1, Rishab Arora1, Maheedhara R Guda1, Swapna Asuthkar1, Andrew J Tsung2, Kiran K Velpula3.   

Abstract

GLUT1, and to a lesser extent, GLUT3, appear to be interesting targets in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. The current review aims to give a brief history of the scientific community's understanding of these glucose transporters and to relate their importance to the metabolic changes that occur as a result of cancer. One of the primary changes that occurs in cancer, the Warburg Effect, is characterized by an extreme shift toward glycolysis from the usual reliance on oxidative phosphorylation and is currently being investigated to target the upstream and downstream factors responsible for Warburg-induced changes. Further, it aims to explain the differential expression of GLUT1 and GLUT3 in glioblastoma tissue, and how these modulations in expression can serve as targets to restore a more normal metabolism. Additionally, hypoxia-induced factor-1α's (HIF1α) role in a number of transcriptional changes typical to GBM will be discussed, including its role in GLUT upregulation. Finally, the four known subtypes of GBM [proneural, neural, mesenchymal, and classical] will be characterized in order to discuss how metabolic changes differ in each subtype. These changes have the potential to be selectively targeted in order to provide specificity to the clinical treatment options in GBM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLUT1; GLUT3; Warburg effect; glioblastoma; hypoxia

Year:  2016        PMID: 27648352      PMCID: PMC5004066     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  70 in total

1.  Targeting GLUT1 and the Warburg effect in renal cell carcinoma by chemical synthetic lethality.

Authors:  Denise A Chan; Patrick D Sutphin; Phuong Nguyen; Sandra Turcotte; Edwin W Lai; Alice Banh; Gloria E Reynolds; Jen-Tsan Chi; Jason Wu; David E Solow-Cordero; Muriel Bonnet; Jack U Flanagan; Donna M Bouley; Edward E Graves; William A Denny; Michael P Hay; Amato J Giaccia
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  The functions and regulation of the PTEN tumour suppressor.

Authors:  Min Sup Song; Leonardo Salmena; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Quercetin sensitizes human glioblastoma cells to temozolomide in vitro via inhibition of Hsp27.

Authors:  Dong-Ping Sang; Ru-Jun Li; Qing Lan
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Inhibition of monocarboxylate transporter-4 depletes stem-like glioblastoma cells and inhibits HIF transcriptional response in a lactate-independent manner.

Authors:  K S Lim; K J Lim; A C Price; B A Orr; C G Eberhart; E E Bar
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Ras inhibition in glioblastoma down-regulates hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, causing glycolysis shutdown and cell death.

Authors:  Roy Blum; Jasmine Jacob-Hirsch; Ninette Amariglio; Gideon Rechavi; Yoel Kloog
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis?

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Combined targeting of PDK1 and EGFR triggers regression of glioblastoma by reversing the Warburg effect.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Velpula; Arnima Bhasin; Swapna Asuthkar; Andrew J Tsung
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Quercetin increases the efficacy of glioblastoma treatment compared to standard chemoradiotherapy by the suppression of PI-3-kinase-Akt pathway.

Authors:  Eva Pozsgai; Szabolcs Bellyei; Anna Cseh; Arpad Boronkai; Boglarka Racz; Aliz Szabo; Balazs Sumegi; Eniko Hocsak
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 9.  Targeting glucose metabolism for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Robert B Hamanaka; Navdeep S Chandel
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  c-MYC inhibition impairs hypoxia response in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Maria Patrizia Mongiardi; Mauro Savino; Maria Laura Falchetti; Barbara Illi; Francesca Bozzo; Cristiana Valle; Manuela Helmer-Citterich; Fabrizio Ferrè; Sergio Nasi; Andrea Levi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-31
View more
  33 in total

1.  GLUT12 promotes prostate cancer cell growth and is regulated by androgens and CaMKK2 signaling.

Authors:  Mark A White; Efrosini Tsouko; Chenchu Lin; Kimal Rajapakshe; Jeffrey M Spencer; Sandi R Wilkenfeld; Sheiva S Vakili; Thomas L Pulliam; Dominik Awad; Fotis Nikolos; Rajasekhara Reddy Katreddy; Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; Arun Sreekumar; Xiaoliu Zhang; Edwin Cheung; Cristian Coarfa; Daniel E Frigo
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 2.  The Role of Metabolic Plasticity in Blood and Brain Stem Cell Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Catherine J Libby; Jonathan McConathy; Victor Darley-Usmar; Anita B Hjelmeland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  A synthetic lethal drug combination mimics glucose deprivation-induced cancer cell death in the presence of glucose.

Authors:  James H Joly; Alireza Delfarah; Philip S Phung; Sydney Parrish; Nicholas A Graham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  MiR-520b inhibits the development of glioma by directly targeting MBD2.

Authors:  Sitong Cui; Liang Liu; Teng Wan; Lei Jiang; Yan Shi; Liangsheng Luo
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Glioblastoma-Astrocyte Connexin 43 Gap Junctions Promote Tumor Invasion.

Authors:  Sean McCutcheon; David C Spray
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.333

6.  Feasibility of multi-parametric PET and MRI for prediction of tumour recurrence in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Lundemann; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Aida Muhic; Vibeke A Larsen; Hans S Poulsen; Svend-Aage Engelholm; Flemming L Andersen; Andreas Kjær; Henrik B W Larsson; Ian Law; Adam E Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  The pro-tumorigenic effects of metabolic alterations in glioblastoma including brain tumor initiating cells.

Authors:  Catherine J Libby; Anh Nhat Tran; Sarah E Scott; Corinne Griguer; Anita B Hjelmeland
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 8.  Poor prognosis of hexokinase 2 overexpression in solid tumors of digestive system: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiayuan Wu; Liren Hu; Fenping Wu; Lei Zou; Taiping He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

9.  Identification of Compounds That Decrease Glioblastoma Growth and Glucose Uptake in Vitro.

Authors:  Catherine J Landis; Sixue Zhang; Gloria A Benavides; Sarah E Scott; Yanjie Li; Matthew Redmann; Anh Nhat Tran; Arphaxad Otamias; Victor Darley-Usmar; Marek Napierala; Jianhua Zhang; Corinne Elizabeth Augelli-Szafran; Wei Zhang; Anita B Hjelmeland
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 10.  Metabolic Drivers of Invasion in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Joseph H Garcia; Saket Jain; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.