| Literature DB >> 27648305 |
Ailadda Kaewma1, Apichakan Sampannang1, Panya Tuamsuk1, Jaturat Kanpittaya2, Sitthichai Iamsaard3.
Abstract
The rhomboid fossa of clavicle is used to determine the age and sex in anthropology and forensic sciences. The variant types of rhomboid fossa on inferior surface have been reported in many races except in Thais. This study therefore was aimed at classifying the types of the rhomboid fossa in Northeastern Thais. The identified 476 Northeastern Thais dried clavicles (270 males and 206 females) were observed and recorded for the types of rhomboid fossa. The results showed that Thai-rhomboid fossa could be classified into 4 types: Type 1: smooth; Type 2: flat; Type 3: elevated; and Type 4: depressed, respectively. The incidences of rhomboid fossa were as follows: Type 1: 0.21%; Type 2: 19.75%; Type 3: 76.26%; and Type 4: 3.78%, respectively. Additionally, it was found that the percentage of Type 4 (11.84%) was much greater than that of female (1.94%) compared to other types. This incidence of rhomboid fossa types especially Type 4 may be a basic knowledge to be used in sex identification. The high incidence of rhomboid fossa in both sexes of Northeastern Thai clavicles was Type 3 (elevated type).Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27648305 PMCID: PMC5018312 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9298043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anat Res Int ISSN: 2090-2743
Figure 1The representative photographs showing different types of rhomboid fossa observed in Northeastern Thai clavicles. They could be classified into 4 types: smooth (Type 1), flat (Type 2), elevated (Type 3), and depressed (Type 4), respectively.
Incidence of rhomboid fossa of clavicle between male and female.
| Genders | Numbers | Ages (years) | Types of rhomboid fossa of clavicle | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1: smooth | Type 2: flat | Type 3: elevated | Type 4: depressed | |||||||
| Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | |||
| Males |
| 15–86 | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.74%) | 32 (23.70%) | 16 (11.85%) | 92 (68.15%) | 113 (83.70%) | 11 (8.14%) | 5 (3.70%) |
| Total = 0.74% | Total = 35.55% | Total = 151.85% | Total = 11.84% | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Female |
| 26–94 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 25 (24.27%) | 21 (20.38%) | 78 (75.73%) | 80 (77.67%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.94%) |
| Total = 0% | Total = 44.65% | Total = 153.40% | Total = 1.94% | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| 60.5 ± 14.74 | 1 (0.21%) | 94 (19.75%) | 363 (76.26%) | 18 (3.78%) | ||||
P < 0.005 (Type 3 versus Type 1, 2, or 4).
P < 0.05 (males versus female).