| Literature DB >> 27648249 |
Christa M Burstahler1, James D Roth1, Robert J Gau2, Dennis L Murray3.
Abstract
Population dynamics of specialist carnivores are closely linked to prey availability, but the extent of variability in diet breadth of individual carnivores relative to natural variability in the abundance of their primary prey is not well understood. Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) specialize on snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) and exhibit cyclic fluctuations in abundance that lag 1-2 years behind those of snowshoe hares. Declining hare densities spur demographic changes in lynx, but it is unclear whether a corresponding increase in diet breadth occurs: (1) broadly across a lynx population; (2) only among individuals who are able to effectively switch to alternative prey; or (3) only among individuals who cannot capture sufficient primary prey. We measured stable isotope ratios of lynx muscle tissue spanning a cyclic increase and decline in hare density (1998-2001) in Fort Providence, NT, Canada. We found that lynx cohorts responded differently to hare population change, with yearling animals having broader diets at low hare densities, while adults and dependent juveniles maintained a constant diet through the initial decline in hare density. This result was consistent irrespective of lynx sex and indicates that yearling lynx likely are forced to adopt a broader diet when primary prey densities decline. Our results imply that select cohorts of specialist carnivores can exhibit high dietary plasticity in response to changes in primary prey abundance, prompting the need to determine whether increased diet breadth in young lynx is a successful strategy for surviving through periods of snowshoe hare scarcity. In this way, cohort-specific niche expansion could strongly affect the dynamics of organisms exhibiting population cycles.Entities:
Keywords: Age; intrapopulation variation; niche expansion; population cycles; resource limitation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27648249 PMCID: PMC5016656 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1A yearling Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis). Photograph credit: C.M. Burstahler.
Summary of factors considered at local (Fort Providence, NT) and broad (territory‐wide) spatial scales for designation of environmental condition category (EC: G = good, M = marginal). Estimated age class structure of the study population is corrected for harvest bias based on Slough and Mowat (1996). Recruitment was calculated from age structure data corrected for harvest bias. The total number of lynx pelts harvested per winter in the Northwest Territories from 1997 to 1998 through 2000 to 2001 and the mean (and SD) estimated density of snowshoe hare from seven sites across the Northwest Territories from June 1998 to 2001 indicate broad scale environmental conditions
| Year |
| Local measures | Territory‐wide measures | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juvenile (0 years) | Yearling (1 year) | Subadult (2 years) | Adult (3+ years) | Lynx recruitment (juv./adult) | Snowshoe hare density (hares/ha) | Lynx harvest (# pelts) | Snowshoe hare density (hares/ha) |
| ||
| 1998 | 112 | 0.13 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.62 | 0.04 | 709 | 0.09 (0.27) | M |
| 1999 | 199 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 1.58 | 0.14 | 1491 | 1.12 (1.65) | G |
| 2000 | 93 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 1.87 | 0.49 | 1330 | 1.24 (0.67) | G |
| 2001 | 165 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.40 | 0.23 | 711 | 0.78 (0.55) | M |
Linear mixed models compared to identify predictors of mean Canada lynx population diet reflected in stable isotope ratios for δ 13C and δ 15N (n = 505). Hypotheses included an interaction between environmental condition (EC) and age class (A), their main effects, and sex (S) as fixed effects. Random intercepts were fit for each year of collection (Y) to account for annual variation in stable isotope ratios of the prey community. For each model: K refers to the number of parameters; log‐likelihood (L) indicates the probability of observed values; ΔAIC is the difference between each model and the minimum AIC; model weight (w ) is the relative likelihood of each model (exp(−0.5 ΔAIC) divided by the sum of relative likelihoods of all models in the set; represents the marginal variance explained (fixed effects only); and represents the conditional variance explained by both fixed and random effects
| Model no. | Model |
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ΔAIC |
|
|
|
| ΔAIC |
|
|
| |||
| Global |
| 11 | −196.10 | 10.57 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.18 | − |
|
| 0.12 | 0.16 |
| 1 |
| 10 | −196.86 | 10.10 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.18 | − |
|
| 0.12 | 0.16 |
| 2 |
| 8 | −196.32 | 5.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.18 | −550.18 | 5.12 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| 3 |
| 7 | −197.05 | 4.47 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.18 | −550.24 | 3.24 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| 4 |
| 5 | − |
|
| 0.02 | 0.17 | −552.59 | 3.95 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
| 5 |
| 7 | −196.48 | 3.34 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.17 | −552.23 | 7.23 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.14 |
| 6 |
| 4 | − |
|
| 0.02 | 0.17 | − |
|
| 0.10 | 0.14 |
| 7 |
| 6 | −197.21 | 2.79 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.17 | −552.30 | 5.36 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.14 |
| 8 |
| 4 | − |
|
| 0.00 | 0.17 | −554.74 | 6.24 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Null | 1 + (1| | 3 | − |
|
| 0.00 | 0.17 | −554.76 | 4.30 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
Models with ΔAIC < 2 were supported by the data and are highlighted in bold.
Parameter estimates of fixed effects for linear mixed models of mean δ 13C (a) and δ 15N (b) of Fort Providence lynx. Models are presented in descending order from highest to lowest model weight from model selection (see Table 2). Deflections for environmental condition are from good to marginal in all cases. Deflections for age class are from juveniles to the age class in parentheses: yearlings (y), subadults (s), and adults (a). Deflections for sex are from male to female
| Model no. | Model | Intercept |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | ||||||||||
| Null | 1 + (1| | −24.90 | ||||||||
| 8 |
| −24.92 | 0.04 | |||||||
| 6 |
| −24.90 | −0.07 | |||||||
| 4 |
| −24.92 | −0.07 | 0.04 | ||||||
| 7 |
| −24.84 | −0.07 | −0.09 | −0.05 | |||||
| 5 |
| −24.86 | −0.07 | −0.09 | −0.05 | 0.04 | ||||
| 3 |
| −24.84 | −0.06 | −0.07 | −0.09 | −0.05 | ||||
| 2 |
| −24.86 | −0.06 | −0.07 | −0.09 | −0.05 | 0.04 | |||
| 1 |
| −24.83 | −0.03 | −0.05 | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.09 | −0.10 | −0.06 | |
| Global |
| −24.84 | −0.03 | −0.06 | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.08 | −0.09 | −0.06 | 0.04 |
| (b) | ||||||||||
| 1 |
| 4.55 | −0.11 | 0.02 | −0.41 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.00 | |
| Global |
| 4.54 | −0.11 | 0.02 | −0.42 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.06 | −0.01 | 0.03 |
| 6 |
| 4.63 | 0.34 | |||||||
| 3 |
| 4.50 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.05 | ||||
| 4 |
| 4.62 | 0.34 | 0.01 | ||||||
| Null | 1 + (1| | 4.63 | ||||||||
| 2 |
| 4.49 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.02 | |||
| 7 |
| 4.50 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.06 | |||||
| 8 |
| 4.62 | 0.01 | |||||||
| 5 |
| 4.48 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.02 | ||||
Figure 2Age‐structured differences in isotopic niche breadth (SEA) of lynx during marginal environmental conditions when snowshoe hare densities and lynx recruitment were low (red), and during good environmental conditions when snowshoe hare densities and lynx recruitment were high (black) for A) juvenile lynx, B) yearling lynx, C) subadult lynx, and D) adult lynx. SEA is the standard ellipse area.
Model selection results from an analysis of lynx diet breadth (estimated as standard ellipse area, corrected for small sample size (SEAc); n = 16) as predicted by environmental condition (EC), age class (A), the interaction between environmental condition and age class (EC:A), and random intercepts for year of collection (Y). For each model: K refers to the number of parameters; log‐likelihood indicates the probability of observed values; ΔAIC is the difference between each model and the best fit model; model weight is the relative likelihood of each candidate model (exp(−0.5 ΔAIC) divided by the sum of relative likelihoods of all models in the set; represents the marginal variance explained (fixed effects only); and represents the conditional variance explained by both fixed and random effects
| Model no. | Model |
|
| ΔAIC |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SEAc = | 10 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| 2 | SEAc = | 4 | 0.4 | 4.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| 3 | SEAc = | 6 | 2.4 | 5.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| Null | SEAc = 1 + (1| | 3 | −0.2 | 6.4 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| 4 | SEAc = | 7 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Figure 3Parameter estimates of a split plot linear mixed‐effects model describing variation in standard ellipse area (SEAc) estimates of lynx diet breadth by environmental condition, age class, an interaction of environmental condition and age class, and random intercepts for year of collection. Deflections for environmental condition are from good to marginal in all cases. Deflections for age class are from juveniles to the age class in parentheses. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval of a basic bootstrap on parameter estimates.