Literature DB >> 27647774

Am I My Family's Keeper? Disclosure Dilemmas in Next-Generation Sequencing.

Roel H P Wouters1, Rhodé M Bijlsma2, Margreet G E M Ausems3, Johannes J M van Delden1, Emile E Voest4, Annelien L Bredenoord1.   

Abstract

Ever since genetic testing is possible for specific mutations, ethical debate has sparked on the question of whether professionals have a duty to warn not only patients but also their relatives that might be at risk for hereditary diseases. As next-generation sequencing (NGS) swiftly finds its way into clinical practice, the question who is responsible for conveying unsolicited findings to family members becomes increasingly urgent. Traditionally, there is a strong emphasis on the duties of the professional in this debate. But what is the role of the patient and her family? In this article, we discuss the question of whose duty it is to convey relevant genetic risk information concerning hereditary diseases that can be cured or prevented to the relatives of patients undergoing NGS. We argue in favor of a shared responsibility for professionals and patients and present a strategy that reconciles these roles: a moral accountability nudge. Incorporated into informed consent and counseling services such as letters and online tools, this nudge aims to create awareness on specific patient responsibilities. Commitment of all parties is needed to ensure adequate dissemination of results in the NGS era.
© 2016 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NGS; ethics; libertarian paternalism; moral accountability nudge; next-generation sequencing; unsolicited finding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27647774     DOI: 10.1002/humu.23118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  8 in total

1.  Primary brain calcification: an international study reporting novel variants and associated phenotypes.

Authors:  Eliana Marisa Ramos; Miryam Carecchio; Roberta Lemos; Joana Ferreira; Andrea Legati; Renee Louise Sears; Sandy Chan Hsu; Celeste Panteghini; Luca Magistrelli; Ettore Salsano; Silvia Esposito; Franco Taroni; Anne-Claire Richard; Christine Tranchant; Mathieu Anheim; Xavier Ayrignac; Cyril Goizet; Marie Vidailhet; David Maltete; David Wallon; Thierry Frebourg; Lylyan Pimentel; Daniel H Geschwind; Olivier Vanakker; Douglas Galasko; Brent L Fogel; A Micheil Innes; Alison Ross; William B Dobyns; Diana Alcantara; Mark O'Driscoll; Didier Hannequin; Dominique Campion; João R Oliveira; Barbara Garavaglia; Giovanni Coppola; Gaël Nicolas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Recontacting in clinical genetics and genomic medicine? We need to talk about it.

Authors:  Daniele Carrieri; Sandi Dheensa; Shane Doheny; Angus J Clarke; Peter D Turnpenny; Anneke M Lucassen; Susan E Kelly
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Clinician-Stakeholders' Perspectives on Using Patient Portals to Return Lynch Syndrome Screening Results.

Authors:  Diane M Korngiebel; Kathleen M West; Wylie Burke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic diseases and information to relatives: practical and ethical issues for professionals after introduction of a legal framework in France.

Authors:  Diane d'Audiffret Van Haecke; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  How do clinical genetics consent forms address the familial approach to confidentiality and incidental findings? A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Gillian Crawford; Claire Salter; Michael Parker; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  A tailored approach towards informing relatives at risk of inherited cardiac conditions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lieke M van den Heuvel; Yvonne M Hoedemaekers; Annette F Baas; J Peter van Tintelen; Ellen M A Smets; Imke Christiaans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Preferences to receive unsolicited findings of germline genome sequencing in a large population of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Rhode Bijlsma; Roel Wouters; Hester Wessels; Stefan Sleijfer; Laurens Beerepoot; Daan Ten Bokkel Huinink; Hester Cruijsen; Joan Heijns; Martijn P Lolkema; Neeltje Steeghs; Theo van Voorthuizen; Annelie Vulink; Els Witteveen; Margreet Ausems; Annelien Bredenoord; Anne M May; Emile Voest
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-04

8.  Healthcare professionals' responsibility for informing relatives at risk of hereditary disease.

Authors:  Kalle Grill; Anna Rosén
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.903

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.