Literature DB >> 27647744

The Connecticut Experiment; The Third Installment: 4 Years of Screening Women with Dense Breasts with Bilateral Ultrasound.

Jean M Weigert1.   

Abstract

To determine if the addition of breast ultrasound in women with dense breasts finds cancers that otherwise would have been obscured. Retrospective chart review from five sites from October 2009 through December 2013. Data included: number of screening mammograms; number of screening ultrasounds; Breast Imaging Reporting Data System code results; biopsy results including type of lesion, size, nuclear grade, receptor and node status, and patient demographic data. Year 1, 2,706 ultrasound with 151 biopsies yielded 11 cancers, positive predictive value (PPV) 7.3%. Detection rate of 4.0/1,000. Year 2, 3,351 ultrasounds with 180 biopsies yielded 11 cancers and high risk lesions (HRL), PPV 6.1%. Detection rate 3.3/1,000. Year 3, 4,128 ultrasounds with 148 biopsies yielded 13 cancers and HRL, PPV 8.8%. Detection rate 3.1/1,000. Year 4, 3,331 ultrasounds with 53 biopsies yielded 11 cancers and HRL, PPV of 20.1%. Detection rate of 3.3/1,000. Lesion size ranged 0.3-8.0 cm. Patient age 45-77 years. Three tumors nuclear grade 3 and 1 nuclear grade 2 had positive sentinel nodes. 8 patents had risk factors other than dense breasts. Cancers in patients with prior negative screening ultrasound measured 0.4-1.2 cm and were node negative. Breast ultrasound in women with dense breasts detects mammographically occult malignancy. Over 4 years, the PPV doubled indicating increased accuracy of lesions biopsied while rate of detection remained stable. Lesions were of all cancer types, grade and hormonal status. Only high grade cancers were sentinel node positive and women returning for yearly ultrasound had small lesions with no positive sentinel nodes.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast density; breast ultrasound; mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27647744     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  18 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening: A Density Conundrum.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge, and Intentions for Breast Cancer Screening in a Diverse Sample of Women Age Eligible for Mammography.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Janna Z Andrews; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?

Authors:  Sergio J Sanabria; Orcun Goksel; Katharina Martini; Serafino Forte; Thomas Frauenfelder; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Marga B Rominger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Diagnostic performance improvement with combined use of proteomics biomarker assay and breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Hong-Kyu Kim; Yumi Kim; Dong-Young Noh; Wonshik Han; Jung Min Chang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

Review 8.  The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Between-Race Differences in Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Before and After Breast Density Notification Law.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Suzanne O'Neill; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 10.  Breast density implications and supplemental screening.

Authors:  Athina Vourtsis; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.