Literature DB >> 27646966

Short-term practice effects in mild cognitive impairment: Evaluating different methods of change.

Kevin Duff1,2, Taylor J Atkinson1, Kayla R Suhrie1, Bonnie C Allred Dalley1, Sydney Y Schaefer2,3, Dustin B Hammers1,2.   

Abstract

Practice effects are improvements on cognitive tests as a result of repeated exposure to testing material. However, variability exists in the literature about whether patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) display practice effects, which may be partially due to the methods used to calculate these changes on repeated tests. The purpose of the current study was to examine multiple methods of assessing short-term practice effects in 58 older adults with MCI. The cognitive battery, which included tests of memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised) and processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Trail Making Test Parts A and B), was administered twice across one week. Dependent t tests showed statistically significant improvement on memory scores (ps < .01, ds = 0.8-1.3), but not on processing speed scores. Despite this, the sample showed no clinically meaningful improvement on any cognitive scores using three different reliable change indices. Regression-based change scores did identify relatively large groups of participants who showed smaller than expected practice effects, which may indicate that this method is more sensitive in identifying individuals who may portend a declining trajectory. Practice effects remain a complex construct, worthy of continued investigation in diverse clinical conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive change; Memory; Mild cognitive impairment; Practice effects; Reliable change index

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646966      PMCID: PMC5738658          DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1230596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  34 in total

1.  Scoring higher the second time around: meta-analyses of practice effects in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  Matthew Calamia; Kristian Markon; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Practice effect and beyond: reaction to novelty as an independent predictor of cognitive decline among older adults.

Authors:  Yana Suchy; Matthew L Kraybill; Emilie Franchow
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Reliable change and practice effects: outcomes of various indices compared.

Authors:  Gerard H Maassen; Ercolie Bossema; Nico Brand
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Diagnostic accuracy and practice effects in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set neuropsychological battery.

Authors:  Melissa Mathews; Erin Abner; Richard Kryscio; Gregory Jicha; Gregory Cooper; Charles Smith; Allison Caban-Holt; Frederick A Schmitt
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Practice effects: a unique cognitive variable.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Catherine Callister; Kathryn Dennett; Danielle Tometich
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments.

Authors:  En-Chi Chiu; Chia-Lin Koh; Chia-Yin Tsai; Wen-Shian Lu; Ching-Fan Sheu; I-Ping Hsueh; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Mild cognitive impairment: prodromal Alzheimer's disease or something else?

Authors:  William G Britt; Anne M Hansen; Sofia Bhaskerrao; James P Larsen; Floyd Petersen; April Dickson; Cindy Dickson; Wolff M Kirsch
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Detecting change: A comparison of three neuropsychological methods, using normal and clinical samples.

Authors:  R K Heaton; N Temkin; S Dikmen; N Avitable; M J Taylor; T D Marcotte; I Grant
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  Norms for change in episodic memory as a prerequisite for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Authors:  Stefan Bläsi; Antoinette E Zehnder; Manfred Berres; Kirsten I Taylor; René Spiegel; Andreas U Monsch
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Practice effects and outcome of cognitive training: preliminary evidence from a memory training course.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; David J Moser; Susan K Schultz; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.105

View more
  14 in total

1.  External validation of change formulae in neuropsychology with neuroimaging biomarkers: A methodological recommendation and preliminary clinical data.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Kayla R Suhrie; Bonnie C A Dalley; Jeffrey S Anderson; John M Hoffman
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Objective features of subjective cognitive decline in a United States national database.

Authors:  Stephanie Kielb; Emily Rogalski; Sandra Weintraub; Alfred Rademaker
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Evaluating the Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Cognitive Function in Older Adults.

Authors:  Richard K Gurgel; Kevin Duff; Norman L Foster; Kaitlynn A Urano; Alvin deTorres
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Short-term repeat cognitive testing and its relationship to hippocampal volumes in older adults.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Jeffrey S Anderson; Atul K Mallik; Kayla R Suhrie; Taylor J Atkinson; Bonnie C A Dalley; Sarah Shizuko Morimoto; John M Hoffman
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  The independent living scale in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Relationships to demographic variables and cognitive performance.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Sariah Porter; Ava Dixon; Kayla Suhrie; Dustin Hammers
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  Validation of one-week reliable change methods in cognitively intact community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Dustin B Hammers; Kayla R Suhrie; Ava Dixon; Sariah Porter; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2020-07-02

7.  Demographically-corrected normative data for the HVLT-R, BVMT-R, and Aggregated Learning Ratio values in a sample of older adults.

Authors:  Dustin B Hammers; Kevin Duff; Robert J Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  Demographically-corrected normative data for the RBANS learning ratio in a sample of older adults.

Authors:  Dustin B Hammers; Kevin Duff; Robert J Spencer
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 9.  Assessment and Monitoring of Neurocognitive Function in Pediatric Cancer.

Authors:  Lisa M Jacola; Marita Partanen; Jurgen Lemiere; Melissa M Hudson; Sophie Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 50.717

10.  Cognition or genetics? Predicting Alzheimer's disease with practice effects, APOE genotype, and brain metabolism.

Authors:  Javier Oltra-Cucarella; Miriam Sánchez-SanSegundo; Rosario Ferrer-Cascales
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.