Literature DB >> 27646958

Assessment of the King-Devick® (KD) test for screening acute mTBI/concussion in warfighters.

David V Walsh1, José E Capó-Aponte2, Thomas Beltran3, Wesley R Cole4, Ashley Ballard2, Joseph Y Dumayas2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Department of Defense reported that 344,030 cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) were clinically confirmed from 2000 to 2015, with mild TBI (mTBI) accounting for 82.3% of all cases. Unfortunately, warfighters with TBI are often identified only when moderate or severe head injuries have occurred, leaving more subtle mTBI cases undiagnosed. This study aims to identify and validate an eye-movement visual test for screening acute mTBI.
METHODS: Two-hundred active duty military personnel were recruited to perform the King-Devick® (KD) test. Subjects were equally divided into two groups: those with diagnosed acute mTBI (≤72h) and age-matched controls. The KD test was administered twice for test-retest reliability, and the outcome measure was total cumulative time to complete each test.
RESULTS: The mTBI group had approximately 36% mean slower performance time with significant differences between the groups (p<0.001) in both tests. There were significant differences between the two KD test administrations in each group, however, a strong correlation was observed between each test administration.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in KD test performance were seen between the acute mTBI and control groups. The results suggest the KD test can be utilized for screening acute mTBI. A validated and rapidly administered mTBI screening test with results that are easily interpreted by providers is essential in making return-to-duty decisions in the injured warfighter. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  King-Devick (KD) test; Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); Military; Saccades

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646958     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  5 in total

1.  A COMPARISON OF THE PAPER AND COMPUTERIZED TABLET VERSION OF THE KING-DEVICK TEST IN COLLEGIATE ATHLETES AND THE INFLUENCE OF AGE ON PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  John D Heick; Glenn Edgerton; Scot Raab
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-10

2.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

Review 3.  The Measurement of Eye Movements in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Structured Review of an Emerging Area.

Authors:  Samuel Stuart; Lucy Parrington; Douglas Martini; Robert Peterka; James Chesnutt; Laurie King
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-01-28

Review 4.  A Critical Review of Consumer Wearables, Mobile Applications, and Equipment for Providing Biofeedback, Monitoring Stress, and Sleep in Physically Active Populations.

Authors:  Jonathan M Peake; Graham Kerr; John P Sullivan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Vision care in concussion and traumatic brain injury: unmet needs.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Barry Tannen; Penelope S Suter
Journal:  Concussion       Date:  2020-07-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.