Literature DB >> 27646479

Moving toward a paradigm shift in the regulatory requirements for pediatric medicines.

William Wei Lim Chin1, Angelika Joos2.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been growing concern over the lack of proper medication for children. This review attempts to evaluate the current progress of EU Pediatric Regulation made since 2007. The lack of properly evaluated pediatric medication has for long been a source of concern in the European Union. The drugs that were used in the past were often not properly evaluated, and dosage was arbitrarily calculated. Therefore, it was necessary to establish the Pediatric Regulation (EC no. 1901/2006) in the EU which would mandate research for pediatric drugs. Current legislations in place not only require mandatory research by pharma industry but also have guidelines to direct the quality of pediatric research performed. The main aim of this regulation was to advance high-quality research and development of pediatric drugs, thereby increasing the availability of safe and effective drugs for children. It also aimed to improve the information available on existing pediatric drugs. It has been 9 years since the pediatric regulation was framed. The pharma industry now sees pediatric research as an integral process of development. Drug companies which develop plans for a new drug, new form of drug, new indication, or new route of administration for adults are obliged to integrate in their development plan similar research for pediatric populations as well.
CONCLUSION: It is hoped that the implementation of the current legislation will be reflected better in the future by the marketing of better and safer drugs for the pediatric population. The upcoming assessment to the European Commission in 2017 will further inform us on the impact after 10 years implementation of the legislation. What is Known: • The lack of properly evaluated pediatric medication has for long been a source of concern in the European Union. • Therefore, it was necessary to establish the EU Pediatric Regulation which would mandate research for pediatric drugs. What is New: • It has been 9 years since the pediatric regulation was framed, and the teething problems are slowly being overcome and the regulation is being used with increasing confidence. • As the Regulation is due for revision in 2017, this paper gives a current perspective on the impact of the regulation on availability and access to medicine for children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; European regulation; Pediatric medicines; Pharmaceutical development; Regulatory framework

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646479     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2781-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  51 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic studies: the current state and future perspectives.

Authors:  Roberta Russo; Mario Capasso; Paolo Paolucci; Achille Iolascon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Formulations for children: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor; John F Marriott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Demonstrating evidence of acceptability: the "catch-22" of pediatric formulation development.

Authors:  S Ranmal; C Tuleu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Three years of paediatric regulation in the European Union.

Authors:  Thorsten M Olski; Simona F Lampus; Giulia Gherarducci; Agnes Saint Raymond
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Patient involvement in paediatric research.

Authors:  Cor Oosterwijk
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.875

6.  Pediatric versus adult drug trials for conditions with high pediatric disease burden.

Authors:  Florence T Bourgeois; Srinivas Murthy; Catia Pinto; Karen L Olson; John P A Ioannidis; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Lack of pediatric drug formulations.

Authors:  M C Nahata
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Paediatric drug development: the impact of evolving regulations.

Authors:  M A Turner; M Catapano; S Hirschfeld; C Giaquinto
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Regulatory perspectives on acceptability testing of dosage forms in children.

Authors:  Piotr Kozarewicz
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.875

10.  Pediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Sandeep B Bavdekar
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2013-01
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Sequential analysis in neonatal research-systematic review.

Authors:  Sebastiano A G Lava; Valéry Elie; Phuong Thi Viet Ha; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Role of Patients and Parents in Pediatric Drug Development.

Authors:  Vivian W L Tsang; Leanne West; Christine Woods; Chester J Koh; Susan McCune; Theresa Mullin; Sharon R Smith; Segolene Gaillard; Joana Claverol; Begonya Nafria; Jennifer Preston; Pamela Dicks; Charles Thompson
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 1.778

3.  Clinical trials of disease-modifying agents in pediatric MS: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations from the IPMSSG.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Waubant; Brenda Banwell; Evangeline Wassmer; Maria-Pia Sormani; Maria-Pia Amato; Rogier Hintzen; Lauren Krupp; Kevin Rostásy; Silvia Tenembaum; Tanuja Chitnis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  The Investigational Clinical Center: a clinical-supportive and patient-centered trial unit model. Ten years of experience through normal and pandemic times of a large pediatric trial center in Italy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pontrelli; Marco Ciabattini; Franco De Crescenzo; Isabella Biondi; Rossana Cocchiola; Giorgia Copponi; Claudia Frillici; Francesca Molinari; Francesca Rocchi; Alessandra Simonetti; Paolo Rossi; Susanna Livadiotti
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.638

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.